The scenes of Marioupal are right out of Lords of The Ring. Millions of alleged Christian men in America and Russia have long thirsted for a Day of Hell so they can be on the side of Jesus and Righteousness. They are on the side of Evil and Brutal Darkness. Followers of Orc De Santos helped Putin and his Evil Brain fill mass graves with civilians that have been targetted. What God will hang around their neck will foul the air around the Ugliness of Christian Nationalism. Those who signed up for that are Real Orcs and Monsters!
As a candidate for Governor of Oregon, I will show the Nation and the World the demons that were born of the rectum of Christian Nationalism. I will TAKE JESUS AWAY from Half-Men Full-Demon Ugly White Men like the Confederate Demons who fought battles in Florida so they could keep black women and their child – slaves! De Santos gives birth to the Second Roman Empire in America, the Confederacy being the first. Plantations look like Roman villas.
Pope Francis has canceled his meeting with Killer Kirill in Jerusalem. He can not be in support of Ugly Christian Nationalism. Here is one of the Ugly Dark Men who make up ‘Putin’s Brain’. Jesus was never a candidate for God, or, the real Son of God. That is a blasphemous claim. If God is real, he would not approve of the Governor of Florida PLAYING GOG by claiming LGBTQ people – are not on God’s side – and placing them on the side of Satan. I suspect we are on the Eve of the Battle of Armageddon and predicted by Herbert Armstrong. They opening move on this Cosmic Chessboard does not begin by declaring a Holy Crusade against Ukraine in order to STOP Gay Pride Parades. For all those millions of Armed Ugly Racists of White Family Values – GO SIT ON THE BENCH! You’re out of the war! You were defeated when…..TRUMP LOST THE ELECTION!
The Anti-Christ dies in 1974, and his minion now prepare to move across Europe. So far, a Jewish Leader – stands in his way.
John Presco ‘End Time Elijah’
Western allies are sending heavier weaponry to Ukraine as Russia launches a new offensive.
- A US defense official told The Washington Post that Ukraine now has more tanks than Russia does.
- Russia is still feeling the losses it sustained earlier in the conflict, UK intelligence said.
Plans for Pope Francis to meet in Jerusalem in June with Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill, who has backed Russia’s war in Ukraine, have been suspended, the pope has told an Argentine newspaper.
Evola in the early 1940s
The Royal Janitor
Chapter Putin’s Brain
After answering Steven Seagal’s cellphone after this Brute was subdued by Starfish, The Wizard was surprised to hear he was talking with “Putin’s Brain”.
‘Hello, Dugin. It is not so good to hear your voice.”
“Who is this?”
“This is your old nemesis who you accused of stealing the core teaching of Evola. We almost fought a dual, remember?”
“How can I forget. Do you still have it? And how did you get Steven’s phone?”
“Mr. Seagal had an accident. He ran into a bouquet of sunflowers. Arnold Schwarzenegger is giving him CPR. It looks like he may live! I want you to quit Putin and come work for me at BAD.”
“You can go to hell! I want what belongs to me! I will send a Psychic Bill Collector for you. You owe me!”
“When can I expect him – or her! Do some meditating and see what kind of force protects me – now!”
After five minutes….
“How did you find her? Where is she! Tell me – you rotten son of a bitch?”
“She’s right here, sleeping next to Steven. I had to dart her.”
In 1980, Dugin joined the “Yuzhinsky group“, an avant-garde dissident group which dabbled in Satanism and other forms of the occult. In the group, he was known for his embrace of Nazism which he attributes to a rebellion against his Soviet raising, as opposed to genuine sympathy for Hitler. He adopted an alter ego with the name of “Hans Siever”, a reference to Wolfram Sievers, a Nazi researcher of the paranormal. Studying by himself, he learnt to speak Italian, German, French, English and Spanish. He also discovered the writings of Julius Evola in the V. I. Lenin State Library, and adopted the beliefs of the Traditionalist School. In 1987 he was convicted of molesting a 12-year-old boy.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|Evola in the early 1940s|
|Born||Giulio Cesare Andrea Evola|
19 May 1898
Rome, Kingdom of Italy
|Died||11 June 1974 (aged 76)|
Rome, Republic of Italy
|Education||Istituto Tecnico Leonardo da Vinci, Rome (no degree)|
|Notable work||Revolt Against the Modern World (1934)|
|Region||Western philosophyWestern esotericism|
|Institutions||School of Fascist Mysticism|
|Main interests||Comparative religionEsotericismHermeticismMetaphysicsHistoryPolitical philosophySymbologyMythology|
|Notable ideas||Fascist mysticismspiritual racismtranscendental realismmagical idealism|
Giulio Cesare Andrea Evola (Italian: [ˈɛːvola]; 19 May 1898 – 11 June 1974), better known as Julius Evola, was an Italian philosopher, poet, and painter who has been described as a “fascist intellectual”, a “radical traditionalist“, “antiegalitarian, antiliberal, antidemocratic, and antipopular”, and as “the leading philosopher of Europe’s neofascist movement”. His esoteric worldview featured antisemitic conspiracy theories and the occult.
Evola is popular in fringe circles, largely because of his metaphysical, magical, and supernatural beliefs – including belief in ghosts, telepathy, and alchemy – and his traditionalism. He termed his philosophy “magical idealism”. Many of Evola’s theories and writings were centered on his hostility toward Christianity and his idiosyncratic mysticism, occultism, and esoteric religious studies,[page needed] and this aspect of his work has influenced occultists and esotericists. Evola also justified male domination over women as part of a purely patriarchal society, an outlook stemming from his traditionalist views on gender, which demanded women stay in or revert to what he saw as their traditional gender roles, where they were completely subordinate to male authority.
According to the scholar Franco Ferraresi, “Evola’s doctrine can be considered as one of the most radical, consistent, rigorous expressions of anti-equalitarian, anti-liberal, anti-democratic and anti-popular thought in the twentieth century”. It is a singular, though not necessarily original, blend of several schools and traditions, including German idealism, Eastern doctrines, traditionalism, and the all-embracing Weltanschauung of the interwar conservative revolutionary movement with which Evola had a deep personal involvement. Historian Aaron Gillette described Evola as “one of the most influential fascist racists in Italian history”.
Evola admired SS head Reichsführer Heinrich Himmler, whom he once met. Autobiographical remarks by Evola allude to his having worked for the Sicherheitsdienst, or SD, the intelligence agency of the SS and the Nazi Party. During his trial in 1951, Evola denied being a fascist and instead referred to himself as “superfascista” (lit. ’superfascist’). Concerning this statement, historian Elisabetta Cassina Wolff wrote that “It is unclear whether this meant that Evola was placing himself above or beyond Fascism”.
- 2Writing career
- 3Occultism and esotericism
- 4Views on race
- 5Views on “caste” and class
- 7Post-World War II
- 8Political influence
- 10See also
- 12External links
Giulio Cesare Evola was born in Rome, the son of Vincenzo Evola (born 1854) and Concetta Mangiapane (born 1865). Both his parents had been born in Cinisi, a small town in the Province of Palermo on the north-western coast of Sicily. The paternal grandparents of Giulio Cesare Evola were Giuseppe Evola and Maria Cusumano. Giuseppe Evola is reported as being a joiner in Vincenzo’s birth record. The maternal grandparents of Giulio Cesare Evola were Cesare Mangiapane, reported as being a shopkeeper in Concetta’s birth record, and his wife Caterina Munacó. Vincenzo Evola and Concetta Mangiapane were married in Cinisi on 25 November 1892. Vincenzo Evola is reported as being a telegraphic mechanic chief, while Concetta Mangiapane is reported as being a landowner. Giulio Cesare Evola had an elder brother, Giuseppe Gaspare Dinamo Evola, born in 1895 in Rome. Following a slight variation on the Sicilian naming convention of the era, as the second son, Giulio Cesare Evola was partly named after his maternal grandfather.
Evola has been often been reported as being a baron, probably in reference to a purported distant relationship with a minor aristocratic family, the Evoli, who were the barons of Castropignano in the Kingdom of Sicily in the late Middle Ages.
Little is known about Evola’s early upbringing except that he considered it irrelevant. He studied engineering at the Istituto Tecnico Leonardo da Vinci in Rome, but did not complete his course, later claiming this was because he “did not want to be associated in any way with bourgeois academic recognition and titles such as doctor and engineer.”: 3 
In his teenage years, Evola immersed himself in painting—which he considered one of his natural talents—and literature, including Oscar Wilde and Gabriele d’Annunzio. He was introduced to philosophers such as Friedrich Nietzsche and Otto Weininger. Other early philosophical influences included Carlo Michelstaedter and Max Stirner.
In the First World War, Evola served as an artillery officer on the Asiago plateau. He was attracted to the avant-garde, and after the war he briefly associated with Filippo Tommaso Marinetti‘s Futurist movement. Through his painting and poetry, and through work on the short-lived journal Revue Bleue, he became a prominent representative of Dadaism in Italy. In 1922, after concluding that avant-garde art was becoming commercialized and stiffened by academic conventions, he reduced his focus on artistic expression such as painting and poetry.[non-primary source needed]
Evola was arrested in April 1951 by the Political Office of the Rome Police Headquarters and charged on suspicion that he was an ideologist of the militant neofascist organization Fasci di Azione Rivoluzionaria (FAR). Evola was defended by Prof. Francesco Carnelutti. On November 20, 1951, Evola was acquitted of all charges.
In 1928, Evola wrote an attack on Christianity titled Pagan Imperialism, which proposed transforming fascism into a system consistent with ancient Roman values and Western esotericism. Evola proposed that fascism should be a vehicle for reinstating the caste system and aristocracy of antiquity. Although he invoked the term “fascism” in this text, his diatribe against the Catholic Church was criticized by both Mussolini‘s fascist regime and the Vatican itself. A. James Gregor argued that the text was an attack on fascism as it stood at the time of writing, but noted that Mussolini made use of it to threaten the Vatican with the possibility of an “anti-clerical fascism”.: 89–91 On account of Evola’s anti-Christian proposals, in April 1928 the Vatican-backed right wing Catholic journal Revue Internationale des Sociétés Secrètes published an article entitled “Un Sataniste Italien: Julius Evola”, accusing him of satanism.
In his The Mystery of the Grail (1937), Evola discarded Christian interpretations of the Holy Grail and wrote that it
symbolizes the principle of an immortalizing and transcendent force connected to the primordial state … The mystery of the Grail is a mystery of a warrior initiation.
He held that the Ghibellines, who had fought the Guelph for control of Northern and Central Italy in the thirteenth century, had within them the residual influences of pre-Christian Celtic and Nordic traditions that represented his conception of the Grail myth. He also held that the Guelph victory against the Ghibellines represented a regression of the castes, since the merchant caste took over from the warrior caste.[page needed] In the epilogue to this book, Evola argued that the fictitious The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, regardless of whether it was authentic or not, was a cogent representation of modernity. The historian Richard Barber said,
Evola mixes rhetoric, prejudice, scholarship, and politics into a strange version of the present and future, but in the process he brings together for the first time interest in the esoteric and in conspiracy theory which characterize much of the later Grail literature.
In his The Doctrine of Awakening (1943), Evola argued that the Pāli Canon could be held to represent true Buddhism. His interpretation of Buddhism is that it was intended to be anti-democratic. He believed that Buddhism revealed the essence of an “Aryan” tradition that had become corrupted and lost in the West. He believed it could be interpreted to reveal the superiority of a warrior caste. Harry Oldmeadow described Evola’s work on Buddhism as exhibiting a Nietzschean influence, but Evola criticized Nietzsche’s purported anti-ascetic prejudice. Evola claimed that the book “received the official approbation of the Pāli [Text] Society”, and was published by a reputable Orientalist publisher. Evola’s interpretation of Buddhism, as put forth in his article “Spiritual Virility in Buddhism”, is in conflict with the post-WWII scholarship of the Orientalist Giuseppe Tucci, who argues that the viewpoint that Buddhism advocates universal benevolence is legitimate. Arthur Versluis stated that Evola’s writing on Buddhism was a vehicle for his own theories, but was a far from accurate rendition of the subject, and he held that much the same could be said of Evola’s writing on Hermeticism. Ñāṇavīra Thera was inspired to become a bhikkhu from reading Evola’s text The Doctrine of Awakening in 1945 while hospitalized in Sorrento.
Evola’s Revolt Against the Modern World (1934) promotes the mythology of an ancient Golden Age which gradually declined into modern decadence. In this work, Evola described the features of his idealized traditional society in which religious and temporal power were created and united not by priests, but by warriors expressing spiritual power. In mythology, he saw evidence of the West’s superiority over the East. Moreover, he claimed that the traditional elite had the ability to access power and knowledge through a hierarchical magic which differed from the lower “superstitious and fraudulent” forms of magic.[page needed] Evola insists that only “nonmodern forms, institutions, and knowledge” could produce a “real renewal … in those who are still capable of receiving it.” The text was “immediately recognized by Mircea Eliade and other intellectuals who allegedly advanced ideas associated with Tradition.” Eliade was one of the most influential twentieth-century historians of religion, a fascist sympathizer associated with the Romanian Christian right wing movement Iron Guard. Evola was aware of the importance of myth from his readings of Georges Sorel, one of the key intellectual influences on fascism.[page needed] Hermann Hesse described Revolt Against the Modern World as “really dangerous.”
During the 1960s Evola thought the right could no longer reverse the corruption of modern civilization. E. C. Wolff noted that this is why Evola wrote Ride the Tiger, choosing to distance himself completely from active political engagement, without excluding the possibility of action in the future. He argued that one should stay firm and ready to intervene when the tiger of modernity “is tired of running.” Goodrick-Clarke notes that, “Evola sets up the ideal of the ‘active nihilist’ who is prepared to act with violence against modern decadence.”
In the posthumously published collection of writings, Metaphysics of War, Evola, in line with the conservative revolutionary Ernst Jünger, explored the viewpoint that war could be a spiritually fulfilling experience. He proposed the necessity of a transcendental orientation in a warrior.
From 1934 to 1943 Evola was also responsible for ‘Diorama Filosofico’, the cultural page of Il Regime Fascista, a daily newspaper owned by Roberto Farinacci. He would also contribute during the same period to Giovanni Preziosi magazine La vita italiana.
Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke has written that Evola’s 1945 essay “American ‘Civilization'” described the United States as “the final stage of European decline into the ‘interior formlessness’ of vacuous individualism, conformity and vulgarity under the universal aegis of money-making.” According to Goodrick-Clarke, Evola argued that the U.S. “mechanistic and rational philosophy of progress combined with a mundane horizon of prosperity to transform the world into an enormous suburban shopping mall.”
Occultism and esotericism
Around 1920, Evola’s interests led him into spiritual, transcendental, and “supra-rational” studies. He began reading various esoteric texts and gradually delved deeper into the occult, alchemy, magic, and Oriental studies, particularly Tibetan Tantric yoga. A keen mountaineer, Evola described the experience as a source of revelatory spiritual experiences. After his return from the war, Evola experimented with hallucinogens and magic.
When he was about 23 years old, Evola considered suicide. He claimed that he avoided suicide thanks to a revelation he had while reading an early Buddhist text that dealt with shedding all forms of identity other than absolute transcendence. Evola would later publish the text The Doctrine of Awakening, which he regarded as a repayment of his debt to Buddhism for saving him from suicide.[page needed]
Evola wrote prodigiously on Eastern mysticism, Tantra, hermeticism, the myth of the Holy Grail and Western esotericism.[page needed] German Egyptologist and esoteric scholar Florian Ebeling has noted that Evola’s The Hermetic Tradition is viewed as an “extremely important work on Hermeticism” in the eyes of esotericists. Evola gave particular focus to Cesare della Riviera’s text Il Mondo Magico degli Heroi, which he later republished in modern Italian. He held that Riviera’s text was consonant with the goals of “high magic” – the reshaping of the earthly human into a transcendental ‘god man’. According to Evola, the alleged “timeless” Traditional science was able to come to lucid expression through this text, in spite of the “coverings” added to it to prevent accusations from the church. Though Evola rejected Carl Jung‘s interpretation of alchemy, Jung described Evola’s The Hermetic Tradition as a “magisterial account of Hermetic philosophy”. In Hegel and the Hermetic Tradition, the philosopher Glenn Alexander Magee favored Evola’s interpretation over that of Jung’s. In 1988, a journal devoted to Hermetic thought published a section of Evola’s book and described it as “Luciferian.”
Evola later confessed that he was not a Buddhist, and that his text on Buddhism was meant to balance his earlier work on the Hindu tantras. Evola’s interest in tantra was spurred on by correspondence with John Woodroffe. Evola was attracted to the active aspect of tantra, and its claim to provide a practical means to spiritual experience, over the more “passive” approaches in other forms of Eastern spirituality. In Tantric Buddhism in East Asia, Richard K. Payne, Dean of the Institute of Buddhist Studies, argued that Evola manipulated Tantra in the service of right wing violence, and that the emphasis on “power” in The Yoga of Power gave insight into his mentality.
Evola advocated that “differentiated individuals” following the Left-Hand Path use dark violent sexual powers against the modern world. For Evola, these “virile heroes” are both generous and cruel, possess the ability to rule, and commit “Dionysian” acts that might be seen as conventionally immoral. For Evola, the Left Hand path embraces violence as a means of transgression.: 217
According to A. James Gregor Evola’s definition of spirituality can be found in Meditations on the Peaks: “what has been successfully actualized and translated into a sense of superiority which is experienced inside by the soul, and a noble demeanor, which is expressed in the body.”: 101–102 Goodrick-Clarke wrote that Evola’s “rigorous New Age spirituality speaks directly to those who reject absolutely the leveling world of democracy, capitalism, multi-racialism and technology at the outset of the twenty-first century. Their acute sense of cultural chaos can find powerful relief in his ideal of total renewal.” Thomas Sheehan wrote that to “read Evola is to take a trip through a weird and fascinating jungle of ancient mythologies, pseudo-ethnology, and transcendental mysticism that is enough to make any southern California consciousness-tripper feel quite at home.”
Thomas Sheehan wrote that “Evola’s first philosophical works from the ‘twenties were dedicated to reshaping neo-idealism from a philosophy of Absolute Spirit and Mind into a philosophy of the “absolute individual” and action.” Accordingly, Evola developed the doctrine of “magical idealism“, which held that “the Ego must understand that everything that seems to have a reality independent of it is nothing but an illusion, caused by its own deficiency.” For Evola, this ever-increasing unity with the “absolute individual” was consistent with unconstrained liberty, and therefore unconditional power. In his 1925 work Essays on Magical Idealism, Evola declared that “God does not exist. The Ego must create him by making itself divine.”
According to Sheehan, Evola discovered the power of metaphysical mythology while developing his theories. This led to his advocacy of supra-rational intellectual intuition over discursive knowledge. In Evola’s view, discursive knowledge separates man from Being. Sheehan stated that this position is a theme in certain interpretations of Western philosophers such as Plato, Thomas Aquinas, and Martin Heidegger that was exaggerated by Evola. Evola would later write:
The truths that allow us to understand the world of Tradition are not those that can be “learned” or “discussed.” They either are or are not. We can only remember them, and that happens when we are freed from the obstacles represented by various human constructions (chief among these are the results and methods of the authorized “researchers”) and have awakened the capacity to see from the nonhuman viewpoint, which is the same as the Traditional viewpoint … Traditional truths have always been held to be essentially non-human.
Evola developed a doctrine of the “two natures”: the natural world and the primordial “world of ‘Being'”. He believed that these “two natures” impose form and quality on lower matter and create a hierarchical “great chain of Being.” He understood “spiritual virility” as signifying orientation towards this postulated transcendent principle. He held that the State should reflect this “ordering from above” and the consequent hierarchical differentiation of individuals according to their “organic preformation”. By “organic preformation” he meant that which “gathers, preserves, and refines one’s talents and qualifications for determinate functions.”
Evola was introduced to esotericism by Arturo Reghini, who was an early supporter of fascism. Reghini sought to promote a “cultured magic” opposed to Christianity and introduced Evola to the traditionalist René Guénon. In 1927, Reghini and Evola, along with other Italian esotericists, founded the Gruppo di Ur (“Ur Group”). The purpose of this group was to attempt to bring the members’ individual identities into such a superhuman state of power and awareness that they would be able to exert a magical influence on the world. The group employed techniques from Buddhist, Tantric, and rare Hermetic texts. They aimed to provide a “soul” to the burgeoning Fascist movement of the time through the revival of ancient Roman religion, and to influence the fascist regime through esotericism.
Articles on occultism from the Ur Group were later published in Introduction to Magic.: 89  Reghini’s support of Freemasonry would however prove a bone of contention for Evola; accordingly, Evola broke with Reghini in 1928.[page needed] Reghini himself broke from Evola, accusing Evola of plagiarizing his thoughts in the book Pagan Imperialism. Evola, on the other hand, blamed Reghini for the premature publication of Pagan Imperialism.[page needed] Evola’s later work owed a considerable debt to René Guénon’s text Crisis of the Modern World, though he diverged from Guénon on the issue of the relationship between warriors and priests.[page needed]
Views on sex and gender roles
Julius Evola believed that the alleged higher qualities expected of a man of a particular race were not those expected of a woman of the same race. He held that “just relations between the sexes” involved women acknowledging their “inequality” with men.[page needed] In 1925, he wrote an article titled “La donna come cosa” (“Woman as Thing”).[page needed] Evola later quoted Joseph de Maistre‘s statement that “Woman cannot be superior except as woman, but from the moment in which she desires to emulate man she is nothing but a monkey.” Evola believed that women’s liberation was “the renunciation by woman of her right to be a woman”. A woman “could traditionally participate in the sacred hierarchical order only in a mediated fashion through her relationship with a man.”[page needed] He held, as a feature of his idealized gender relations, the Hindu sati, which for him was a form of sacrifice indicating women’s respect for patriarchal traditions. For the “pure, feminine” woman, “man is not perceived by her as a mere husband or lover, but as her lord.” Women would find their true identity in total subjugation to men.[page needed]
Evola regarded matriarchy and goddess religions as a symptom of decadence, and preferred a hyper-masculine, warrior ethos.
Evola was influenced by Hans Blüher; he was a proponent of the Männerbund concept as a model for his proposed ultra-fascist “Order”.[page needed] Goodrick-Clarke noted the fundamental influence of Otto Weininger‘s book Sex and Character on Evola’s dualism of male-female spirituality. According to Goodrich-Clarke, “Evola’s celebration of virile spirituality was rooted in Weininger’s work, which was widely translated by the end of the First World War.” Unlike Weininger, Evola believed that women needed to be conquered, not ignored.[page needed] Evola denounced homosexuality as “useless” for his purposes. He did not neglect sadomasochism, so long as sadism and masochism “are magnifications of an element potentially present in the deepest essence of eros.”[page needed] Then, it would be possible to “extend, in a transcendental and perhaps ecstatic way, the possibilities of sex.”[page needed]
Evola held that women “played” with men, threatened their masculinity, and lured them into a “constrictive” grasp with their sexuality. He wrote that “It should not be expected of women that they return to what they really are … when men themselves retain only the semblance of true virility”, and lamented that “men instead of being in control of sex are controlled by it and wander about like drunkards”.[page needed] He believed that in Tantra and in sex magic, in which he saw a strategy for aggression, he found the means to counter the “emasculated” West.[page needed] According to Annalisa Merelli, Evola “went so far as to justify rape” because he saw it “as a natural expression of male desire”. Evola also said that the “ritual violation of virgins”, and “whipping women” were a means of “consciousness raising”, so long as these practices were done to the intensity required to produce the proper “liminal psychic climate”. He wrote that “as a rule, nothing stirs a man more than feeling the woman utterly exhausted beneath his own hostile rapture.”
Evola translated Weininger’s Sex and Character into Italian. Dissatisfied with simply translating Weininger’s work, he wrote the text Eros and the Mysteries of Love: The Metaphysics of Sex (1958), where his views on sexuality were dealt with at length.[page needed] Arthur Versluis described this text as Evola’s “most interesting” work aside from Revolt Against the Modern World. This book remains popular among many ‘New Age’ adherents.
Views on race
Evola’s dissent from standard biological concepts of race had roots in his aristocratic elitism, since Nazi völkisch ideology inadequately separated aristocracy from “commoners.”[page needed] According to European studies professor Paul Furlong, Evola developed “the law of the regression of castes” in Revolt Against the Modern World and other writings on racism from the 1930s and World War II period. In Evola’s view “power and civilization have progressed from one to another of the four castes—sacred leaders, warrior nobility, bourgeoisie (economy, ‘merchants’) and slaves”.[page needed] Furlong explains: “for Evola, the core of racial superiority lay in the spiritual qualities of the higher castes, which expressed themselves in physical as well as in cultural features, but were not determined by them. The law of the regression of castes places racism at the core of Evola’s philosophy, since he sees an increasing predominance of lower races as directly expressed through modern mass democracies.”[page needed]
In 1941, Evola’s book Synthesis of the Doctrine of Race (Italian: Sintesi di Dottrina della Razza) was published by Hoepli. It provides an overview of his ideas concerning race and eugenics, introducing the concept of “spiritual racism“, and “esoteric-traditionalist racism”.
Prior to the end of the War, Evola had frequently used the term “Aryan” to mean the nobility, who in his view were imbued with traditional spirituality. Wolff notes that Evola seems to have stopped writing about race in 1945, but adds that the intellectual themes of Evola’s writings were otherwise unchanged. Evola continued to write about elitism and his contempt for the weak. His “doctrine of the Aryan-Roman super-race was simply restated as a doctrine of the ‘leaders of men’ … no longer with reference to the SS, but to the mediaeval Teutonic knights of the Knights Templar, already mentioned in Rivolta.”
Evola spoke of “inferior non-European races”.[page needed] Peter Merkl wrote that “Evola was never prepared to discount the value of blood altogether”. Evola wrote: “a certain balanced consciousness and dignity of race can be considered healthy” in a time where “the exaltation of the negro and all the rest, anticolonialist psychosis and integrationist fanaticism [are] all parallel phenomena in the decline of Europe and the West.” While not totally against race-mixing, in 1957 Evola wrote an article attributing the perceived acceleration of American decadence to the influence of “negroes” and the opposition to segregation. Furlong noted that this article is “among the most extreme in phraseology of any he wrote, and exhibits a degree of intolerance that leaves no doubt as to his deep prejudice against black people.”[page needed]
For his spiritual interpretation of the different racial psychologies, Evola found the work of German race theorist Ludwig Ferdinand Clauss invaluable. Like Evola, Clauss believed that physical race and spiritual race could diverge as a consequence of miscegenation. Evola’s racism included racism of the body, soul, and spirit, giving primacy to the latter factor, writing that “races only declined when their spirit failed.”
Like René Guénon, Evola believed that mankind is living in the Kali Yuga of the Hindu tradition—the Dark Age of unleashed materialistic appetites. He argued that both Italian fascism and Nazism represented hope that the “celestial” Aryan race would be reconstituted.[page needed] He drew on mythological accounts of super-races and their decline, particularly the Hyperboreans, and maintained that traces of Hyperborean influence could be felt in Indo-European man. He felt that Indo-European men had devolved from these higher mythological races. Gregor noted that several contemporary criticisms of Evola’s theory were published: “In one of Fascism’s most important theoretical journals, Evola’s critic pointed out that many Nordic-Aryans, not to speak of Mediterranean Aryans, fail to demonstrate any Hyperborean properties. Instead, they make obvious their materialism, their sensuality, their indifference to loyalty and sacrifice, together with their consuming greed. How do they differ from ‘inferior’ races, and why should anyone wish, in any way, to favor them?”: 106
Concerning the relationship between “spiritual racism” and biological racism, Evola put forth the following viewpoint, which Furlong described as pseudo-scientific:
The factor of “blood” or “race” has its importance, because it is not psychologically—in the brain or the opinions of the individual—but in the very deepest forces of life that traditions live and act as typical formative energies. Blood registers the effects of this action, and indeed offers through heredity, a matter that is already refined and pre-formed …
Views on Jews
Evola endorsed Otto Weininger‘s views on the Jews. Though Evola viewed Jews as corrosive and anti-traditional, he described Adolf Hitler‘s more fanatical antisemitism as a paranoid idée fixe that damaged the reputation of the Third Reich. Evola’s conception did not emphasize the Nazi racial conception of Jews as “representatives of a biological race”—in Evola’s view the Jews were “the carriers of a world view … a spirit [that] corresponded to the ‘worst’ and ‘most decadent’ features of modernity: democracy, egalitarianism and materialism.” Evola rejected the views of chief Nazi theorist Alfred Rosenberg and others on biological racism as being reductionist and materialistic. Jewry was for Evola, as for Weininger, only a symbol for the rule of money and individualism. Otto Weininger desbribed Jewishness as “intellectual tendency”.
Evola argued that the fabricated antisemitic text The Protocols of the Elders of Zion—whether or not a forgery—accurately reflect the conditions of modernity. He believed that the Protocols “contain the plan for an occult war, whose objective is the utter destruction, in the non-Jewish peoples, of all tradition, class, aristocracy, and hierarchy, and of all moral, religious, and spiritual values.” He wrote the foreword to the second Italian edition of the Protocols, which was published by the Fascist Giovanni Preziosi in 1938.
Following the murder of his friend Corneliu Zelea Codreanu, the leader of the Fascist Romanian Iron Guard, Evola expressed anticipation of a “Talmudic, Israelite tyranny.” However, Evola believed that Jews had this “power” only because of European “decadence” in modernity. He also believed that one could be “Aryan”, but have a “Jewish” soul, just as one could be “Jewish”, but have an “Aryan” soul. In Evola’s view, Otto Weininger and Carlo Michelstaedter were Jews of “sufficiently heroic, ascetic, and sacral” character to fit the latter category.: 105
Views on “caste” and class
Julius Evola believe that society develops a “regression of castes” where classes he viewed as superior were replaced by those he viewed as inferior. He believed that the rule of spiritual leaders (the highest class) was replaced by that of warriors (the second highest) then by merchants and finally by the proletariat (whom he described as “spiritual eunuchs”, quoting another philosopher). He believed that each aspect of society was effected by the dominant “caste”, for example, war in the first type was “holy war” and in the second type “defending the honour of one’s lord”. In addition, bourgeois rule makes “usury” socially acceptable. 
Evola developed a line of argument, closely related to the spiritual orientation of Traditionalist writers such as René Guénon and the political concerns of the European authoritarian right.[page needed] Evola’s first published political work was an anti-fascist piece in 1925. In this work, Evola called Italy’s fascist movement a “laughable revolution,” based on empty sentiment and materialistic concerns. He applauded Mussolini’s anti-bourgeois orientation and his goal of making Italian citizens into hardened warriors, but criticized Fascist populism, party politics, and elements of leftism that he saw in the fascist regime. Evola saw Mussolini’s Fascist Party as possessing no cultural or spiritual foundation. He was passionate about infusing it with these elements in order to make it suitable for his ideal conception of Übermensch culture which, in Evola’s view, characterized the imperial grandeur of pre-Christian Europe.[page needed] He expressed anti-nationalist sentiment, stating that to become “truly human,” one would have to “overcome brotherly contamination” and “purge oneself” of the feeling that one is united with others “because of blood, affections, country or human destiny.” He also opposed the futurism that Italian fascism was aligned with, along with the “plebeian” nature of the movement.: 86 Accordingly, Evola launched the journal La Torre (The Tower), to voice his concerns and advocate for a more elitist fascism. Evola’s ideas were poorly received by the fascist mainstream as it stood at the time of his writing.
Julius Evola (1940)
Scholars disagree about why Benito Mussolini embraced racist ideology in 1938—some scholars have written that Mussolini was more motivated by political considerations than ideology when he introduced antisemitic legislation in Italy. Other scholars have rejected the argument that the racial ideology of Italian fascism could be attributed solely to Nazi influence. A more recent interpretation is that Mussolini was frustrated by the slow pace of fascist transformation and, by 1938, had adopted increasingly radical measures including a racial ideology. Aaron Gillette has written that “Racism would become the key driving force behind the creation of the new fascist man, the uomo fascista.”
Mussolini read Evola’s Synthesis of the Doctrine of Race in August 1941, and met with Evola to offer him his praise. Evola later recounted that Mussolini had found in his work a uniquely Roman form of Fascist racism distinct from that found in Nazi Germany. With Mussolini’s backing, Evola started preparing the launch of a minor journal Sangue e Spirito (Blood and Spirit) which never appeared. While not always in agreement with German racial theorists, Evola traveled to Germany in February 1942 and obtained support for German collaboration on Sangue e Spirito from “key figures in the German racial hierarchy.” Fascists appreciated the palingenetic value of Evola’s “proof” “that the true representatives of the state and the culture of ancient Rome were people of the Nordic race.” Evola eventually became Italy’s leading racial philosopher.
Evola blended Sorelianism with Mussolini’s eugenics agenda. Evola has written that “The theory of the Aryo-Roman race and its corresponding myth could integrate the Roman idea proposed, in general, by fascism, as well as give a foundation to Mussolini’s plan to use his state as a means to elevate the average Italian and to enucleate in him a new man.”
In May, 1951, Evola was arrested and charged with promoting the revival of the Fascist Party, and of glorifying Fascism. Defending himself at trial, Evola stated that his work belonged to a long tradition of anti-democratic writers who certainly could be linked to fascism—at least fascism interpreted according to certain Evolian criteria—but who certainly could not be identified with the Fascist regime under Mussolini. Evola then declared that he was not a Fascist but was instead “superfascista” (lit. ’superfascist’). He was acquitted.
Finding Italian fascism too compromising, Evola began to seek recognition in Nazi Germany. Evola spent a considerable amount of time in Germany in 1937 and 1938, and gave a series of lectures to the German–Italian Society in 1938. Evola took issue with Nazi populism and biological materialism. SS authorities initially rejected Evola’s ideas as supranational and aristocratic though he was better received by members of the conservative revolutionary movement. The Nazi Ahnenerbe reported that many considered his ideas to be pure “fantasy” which ignored “historical facts.”. Evola admired Heinrich Himmler, whom he knew personally, but he had reservations about Adolf Hitler because of Hitler’s reliance on völkisch nationalism. Himmler’s Schutzstaffel (“SS”) kept a dossier on Evola—dossier document AR-126 described his plans for a “Roman-Germanic Imperium” as “utopian” and described him as a “reactionary Roman,” whose goal was an “insurrection of the old aristocracy against the modern world.” The document recommended that the SS “stop his effectiveness in Germany” and provide him with no support, particularly because of his desire to create a “secret international order”.
Despite this opposition, Evola was able to establish political connections with pan-Europeanist elements inside the Reich Security Main Office. Evola subsequently ascended to the inner circles of Nazism as the influence of pan-European advocates overtook that of Völkisch proponents, due to military contingencies. Evola wrote the article Reich and Imperium as Elements in the New European Order for the Nazi-backed journal European Review. He spent World War II working for the Sicherheitsdienst. The Sicherheitsdienst bureau Amt VII, a Reich Security Main Office research library, helped Evola acquire arcane occult and Masonic texts.
Italian Fascism went into decline when, in 1943, Mussolini was deposed and imprisoned. At this point, Evola fled to Germany with the help of the Sicherheitsdienst. Although not a member of the National Fascist Party, and despite his apparent problems with the Fascist regime, Evola was one of the first people to greet Mussolini when the latter was broken out of prison by Otto Skorzeny in September, 1943. Subsequently, Evola helped welcome Mussolini to Adolf Hitler‘s Wolf’s Lair. Following this, Evola involved himself in Mussolini’s Italian Social Republic. It was Evola’s custom to walk around the city of Vienna during bombing raids in order to better “ponder his destiny”. During one such raid, 1945, a shell fragment damaged his spinal cord and he became paralyzed from the waist down, remaining so for the rest of his life.
Post-World War II
Julius Evola – Směrnice (2015), the Czech translation of his book Orientamenti (1950)
The democratic powers repeated the error of those who think they can use the forces of subversion for their own ends without cost. They do not know that, by a fatal logic, when exponents of two different grades of subversion meet or cross paths, the one representing the more developed grade will take over in the end.[edition needed]
The political model Evola selected after 1945 was neither Mussolini nor Hitler. Evola cited and encouraged the youth to read Plato (with reference in particular to The Republic), Dante (with reference in particular to De Monarchia), Joseph de Maistre, Donoso Cortés, Bismarck, Metternich, Gaetano Mosca, Pareto and Michels.
After World War II, Evola continued his work in esotericism. He wrote a number of books and articles on sex magic and various other esoteric studies, including The Yoga of Power: Tantra, Shakti, and the Secret Way (1949), Eros and the Mysteries of Love: The Metaphysics of Sex (1958), and Meditations on the Peaks: Mountain Climbing as Metaphor for the Spiritual Quest (1974). He also wrote his two explicitly political books Men Among the Ruins: Post-War Reflections of a Radical Traditionalist (1953), Ride the Tiger: A Survival Manual for the Aristocrats of the Soul (1961), and his autobiography, The Path of Cinnabar (1963). He also expanded upon critiques of American civilization and materialism, as well as increasing American influence in Europe, collected in the posthumous anthology Civiltà Americana.
While trying to distance himself from Nazism, Evola wrote in 1955 that the Nuremberg trials were a farce. This indicates that despite being rejected by the SS before the war, he never stopped admiring their criminal activities.[page needed]
Evola’s occult ontology exerted influence over post-war neo-fascism. In the post-war period, Evola’s writing evoked interest among the neo-fascist right. After 1945, Evola was considered the most important Italian theoretician of the conservative revolutionary movement and the “chief ideologue” of Italy’s post-war radical right. According to Egil Asprem and Kennet Granholm, Evola’s most significant post-war political texts are Orientamenti and Men Among the Ruins. In the opening phrase in the first edition of Men Among the Ruins, Evola said:
Our adversaries would undoubtedly want us, in a Christian spirit, under the banner of progress or reform, having been struck on one cheek to turn the other. Our principle is different: “Do to others what they would like to do to you: but do it to them first.
Orientamenti was a text against “national fascism”—instead, it advocated for a European Community modeled on the principles of the Waffen-SS. The Italian neo-fascist group Ordine Nuovo adopted Orientamenti as a guide for action in postwar Italy. The European Liberation Front, who were affiliated with Francis Parker Yockey, called Evola “Italy’s greatest living authoritarian philosopher” in the April 1951 issue of their publication Frontfighter.
During the post-war period, Evola disassociated himself from totalitarianism, preferring the concept of the “organic” state, which he put forth in his text Men Among the Ruins, as well as in his autodifesa. Evola sought to develop a strategy for the implementation of a “conservative revolution” in post-World War II Europe. He rejected nationalism, advocating instead for a European Imperium, which could take various forms according to local conditions, but should be “organic, hierarchical, anti-democratic, and anti-individual.” Evola endorsed Francis Parker Yockey‘s neo-fascist manifesto Imperium, but disagreed with it because he believed that Yockey had a “superficial” understanding of what was immediately possible. Evola believed that his conception of neo-fascist Europe could best be implemented by an elite of “superior” men who operated outside normal politics.
In Men Among the Ruins, Evola defines the Fourth Estate as being the last stage in the cyclical development of the social elite, the first beginning with the monarchy. Expanding the concept in an essay in 1950, the Fourth State according to Evola would be characterized by “the collectivist civilization… the communist society of the faceless-massman”.
Giuliano Salierni was an activist in the neo-Fascist Italian Social Movement during the early 1950s. He later recalled Evola’s calls to violence. Roberto Fiore and his colleagues in the early 1980s helped the National Front‘s “Political Soldiers” forge a militant elitist philosophy based on Evola’s “most militant tract”, The Aryan Doctrine of Battle and Victory. The Aryan Doctrine called for a “Great Holy War” that would be fought for spiritual renewal and fought in parallel to the physical “Little Holy War” against perceived enemies. Wolff attributes extreme-right terrorist actions in Italy in the 1970s and 1980s to the influence of Julius Evola.
Thomas Sheehan has argued that Evola’s work is essential reading for those seeking to understand European neo-fascism, in the same way that knowledge of the writings of Karl Marx is necessary for those seeking to understand Communist actions.
At one time Italian Fascist leader Benito Mussolini, the Nazi Grail seeker Otto Rahn, and the Romanian fascist sympathizer and religious historian Mircea Eliade admired Julius Evola. After World War II, Evola’s writings continued to influence many European far-right political, racist and neo-fascist movements. He is widely translated in French, Spanish, partly in German, and mostly in Hungarian (the largest number of his translated works).
Giorgio Almirante referred to him as “our Marcuse—only better.” According to one leader of the neofascist “black terrorist” Ordine Nuovo, “Our work since 1953 has been to transpose Evola’s teachings into direct political action.”
The Greek neo-Nazi party Golden Dawn includes his works on its suggested reading list, and the leader of Jobbik, the Hungarian nationalist party, admires Evola and wrote an introduction to his works.
Donald Trump‘s former chief adviser Steve Bannon has pointed to Evola’s influence on the Eurasianism movement; According to Joshua Green‘s book Devil’s Bargain, Evola’s Revolt Against the Modern World had initially drawn Bannon’s interest to the ideas of the Traditionalist School. Alt-right leader and white nationalist Richard Spencer said that Bannon’s awareness of Evola “means a tremendous amount”. Some members of the alt-right expressed hope that Bannon might have been open to Evola’s ideas, and that through Bannon, Evola’s ideas could become influential. According to multiple historians cited by The Atlantic, this is contradictory, as Bannon cited Evola in defense of the “Judeo-Christian west”, while Evola hated and opposed Judaism and Jews, Christianity in general, Anglo-Saxon Protestantism specifically, and the culture of the United States. In a leaked email sent by Bannon in March 2016, he told Milo Yiannopoulos, “I do appreciate any piece that mentions Evola.” Evola has also influenced the alt-right movement.