Belle and I executed several high-fives at our meeting at the Wandering Goat, where she believed she had the upper hand because there was a secret committee behind her, backing up THEIR world view that I had to be the enemy of, because I was not privy to it.

My brother shut me out of the Rosamond Artistic Legacy, that he felt compelled to take over and control, because Christine filed Bankruptcy after Mark leant her $3,000 dollars. He did not care if he drove this creativity into the ground, because all women deserve to be taught a lesson – his lesson! You see, Mark Presco made a strong case that all women are Parasites, the same way Bill Cornwell, and Heather Hanson, made me out to be a Parasite.
When I met Belle Burch in Ken Kesey Square, I thought I had found a creative friend. I really needed a friend, that would also be a friend of the Art World.

I longed for a friend, like my compatriot, Bill Arnold. Bill knew what my brother was, and felt sorry for me. Being an only child, he studied Mark’s affect on me. He concluded he made me a better artist because I had to struggle to rise above his negative and tyrannical view of the world. Just before he excommunicated me from his family, I challenged him to stop hiding in the dark and publish his innermost opinions. Feeling rather proud of himself after taking my advice, he suggested I include some of his judgments of women in my autobiography ‘Capturing Beauty’.

Jon Presco

http://mbpresco.blogspot.com/

http://mbpresco.blogspot.com/2008/08/on-race_28.html

http://mbpresco.blogspot.com/2008/08/problem-with-womens-movement.html

The Problem With The Women’s Movement

The Woman’s Movement is based on two entirely false premises. The first is that “Women have been oppressed and sexually exploited by Men”. This is just the opposite of what is really true. Women enjoy a privileged position in this society and have been making a living sexually exploiting Men for the last five million years. The second is that “Women want sexual equality”. This is the last thing Women want. It should be clear to even the most casual observer that Women have no intention of giving up a single privilege or prerogative or being Female, nor have they. All traditional Female privileges and prerogatives are intact and Women have no intention of giving them up no matter how much they screech about sexual equality out of the other side of Their face. The Women’s Movement has degenerated into a group of spoiled rotten Females demanding to be even more spoiled rotten than they already are.

What do Women want? This can be defined by be phrase coined by the Women’s Movement, “Having it all”, and can be taken literally. Women want all the privileges and prerogatives of both sexes; and the duties, responsibilities and disadvantages of neither. The first thing the Women’s Movement did was disavow all traditional Female responsibilities. Women no longer are required to cook, sew, clean house or be responsible for any of the duties traditionally assigned to Women. Currently there are no obligations that Women feel bound to perform, especially the ones traditionally undertaken by Men. Men, on the other hand, have not shirked any of Their traditional responsibilities; including protecting, defending and providing for Women and Their Children.

It is an obscenity that Women are not signing up for the Draft. The draft is clearly sexual discrimination, but Women have no intention of redressing the inequity. If Women thought the draft was a privilege of being Male, an exclusive fraternity where Men garner power and prestige, they would be chaining themselves to the doors of the Selective Service System and in the courts demanding to be included. But Women see the draft as a disadvantage of being Male and want no part of it no matter how much they screech about sexual equality out of the other side of Their face. Women use the word “Equality” not to achieve true equality but to convince Men that Women’s roles need to be changed in ways more attractive to todays Female.

“Equality” is a loaded word to males. Our culture is based on Freedom and Equality and is the mainstay of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. Our history is replete with heroes, almost exclusively Men, who sacrificed Their lives so that all of us can enjoy the fruits of this philosophy. In recent times the cream of our young Men have given Their lives in World Wars I and II, Korea, Viet Nam and elsewhere so that everyone in world can benefit from it. Men have long accepted the responsibility of defending the group. When danger threatens the group, it is the duty of Men to get between the group and whatever threatens it and sacrifice Their lives, if necessary, in defence of the group. In this respect Men are true altruists, each Man willing to sacrifice His individual life so that the whole will benefit. And as far as Men are concerned this is still a requirement for first class citizenship. Men who fail to fulfil this requirement lose Their status as first class citizens. Draft dodgers, for example, are convicted of a felony and lose the right to vote. In time of war these Men are shot. . . In typical Female fashion, Women want all of privileges and prerogative of first class citizenship without the duties and responsibilities of first class citizenship. This was acceptable under a sexual dichotomy but is entirely unacceptable given the increasing vocal crescendo of “Equality” on the part of Females.

The contribution of Women in the Gulf War was a welcome sight but Females are still not required to take part in the actual fighting. Women are doing little to change this, preferring instead to focus on the fact that they are not promoted as much as Men. This tendency to concentrate on the advantages rather than the duties and responsibilities is typical of Women and, as we shall see, is the problem with Women in the work place. The most telling roles of Females came at the beginning of the war when Saddam Hussein took western hostages in Iraq and Kuwait. Once again it was cries of “save the Women and Children”. Once again Women bestowing upon Themselves the advantages of Children, running away and hiding with the Children and leaving the Men behind to tough it out. These very same Women are all to willing evoke “Equality” in the few cases where they can’t take advantage of the privileges afforded to Women and Children. The rare women who elected to stay with their men during the hostage crisis are the only ones who can command respect.

Much can be said about the lunacy of war. Women justify Their attitude by saying that if they were in charge there would be no wars. They suggest that the aggressiveness and bluster of Males is responsible for war and they should not be required to take part. This is not only simplistic and naive, but one of the reasons that Women are not in charge is that they have not been willing to sacrifice Their lives for Their beliefs or for any other reason for that matter. If they had been willing to take an active part in defense the entire scope of conflict may have changed long ago. It is well know that Women have a dramatic effect on Men in the battlefield and is one of the reasons that generals don’t want Them there. Why the Human Race came to behave this way will be discussed later in this article.

The reason that the draft is focussed on here is to highlight the dishonesty and duplicity of the Women’s Movement. This duplicity is prevalent in all aspects of the Movement as will be demonstrated in this article. The one sided way that “Equality” is applied by Women to benefit themselves is unacceptable. For example, Women suggest that equality means that Men become more like Women by “getting in touch with Their emotions”. This is absurd. Equality might just as well mean that Women become more like Men by getting control of Their emotions. This is more realistic since it is Women who want change Their roles. And since They want equal access to traditional Male roles it is They who must change to adapt to these roles, not the other way around.

Further, Women think that they alone are to be the ones that will define the future roles and relationships of Men and Women. It is time Men stopped silently taking the criticism and verbal abuse of Females and begin telling Women what is to be expected of them if they are to achieve equal status in the traditional Male milieu. The work place has been invented by Men to be implemented by Men in order to meet Their age old obligation of protecting, defending and providing for Women and Their Children. Most Male aggression is channelled here and much of the definition of being a Male is defined here. It has never been a place of fairness and equality and it has been a long hard road to civilize the work place to this extent and We still have a long way to go. It will not change just because Women, or most Men for that matter, want it to. The civilization of the work place has long and bloody history and We still have far to go.

The Traditional Female

The assertion by the Women’s Movement that Women have been enslaved in the kitchen is, again, the exact opposite of the truth. Women defined the traditional Harriot Nelson housewife role just as aggressively as they are redefining Their roles today. Indeed, about half of todays Women still prefer this lifestyle. This has made the Women’s Movement not only duplicitous but downright schizophrenic. Women seem to think they can have it both ways. If it’s to Their advantage, They retain the right to pursue the traditional role of letting a Man be responsible for providing for Them. If They must support Themselves or choose to work, then They want full equality in the work place.

There were two basic reasons why Women established the traditional housewife role. The first was the change from an agrarian to an urban culture. Before the industrial revolution most People lived on family farms and all members of the family worked from dawn to dusk in order to make a living. Life in the cities could be even worse as sweat shop conditions prevailed. Men, Women and Children worked in these sweat shops up to sixteen hours a day and six days a week. It took legislative action to get Children out of the sweat shops, using as precedent a law designed to prevent cruelty to animals. Women got out of the sweat shops by making it a requirement that Men provide them with a home with a well stocked kitchen before they would agree to a sexual relationship. At the time being dependant on a Man for income was preferable to working for a living. Better to let the Man work in the sweat shop while the Woman stayed home with the Children.

This leads to the second reason why the role of housewife was established. At that time sex meant Children and the average Women gave birth to thirteen of Them. Motherhood was a time and a half job and it was not unreasonable to judge a Man by His ability to provide for Them. The particular Human sexual dichotomy that had been established over the last five million years was continued with Women and Men enjoying separate but equal roles. Each sex accepting and performing Their particular duties and responsibilities and being equally dependant on each other. The strongest drive in life, procreation, was being exercised. Men wanted sex and Women wanted Children and the two drives should be equated: Women want Children as much as Men want sex and vice versa. These drives vary in individuals of course, but at times it seems like most Women don’t like sex at all and only submit occasionally in order to have a Child or to make a living sexually exploiting Men. The issue of who sexually exploits who will be discussed later.

This arrangement, though not perfect, was preferred by both sexes at the time. Motherhood became the most revered institution in our culture and special considerations were bestowed on Women because They bore the burden of Child bearing. But it goes much deeper than that. Fathers were now away from home putting long hours in the work place, and when They were home they were often too tired to contribute to Child rearing. Other pressures and considerations further exacerbated this condition. This meant that the major influence on Children were Their Mothers and it was Women who shaped the thoughts and attitudes of Their Children for generations to come. This was true especially for Their Sons. If you don’t believe this, watch a college football game on a Saturday afternoon and notice the response when the camera is turned on the cream of American young Men. It is almost always “Hi Mom!”.

Mother’s influence on Their Sons reinforced not only the institution of Motherhood, but the attitude that being a Man meant protecting, defending and providing for Women and Their Children. Thus the seeds for opposition to Women in the work place were sewn by Women Themselves. But that’s just the beginning of a long list of rules that Mothers taught Their Sons about how to behave toward Women. Like most Men of this generation, Mothers taught Their Sons to open doors for Women, hold Their coats for them, carry Their burdens for them, stand up when They came to the table, stand up when They left the table, and a hundred other things that Women would never do for a Man. Men were being conditioned on how to behave in the presence of royalty.

Indeed, that is how Women began to think of themselves: as Princesses whose problems will be solved when Their Knight in shining armor comes along to whisk them off Their feet with romantic ardor and carry Them off to Their castle where They would live happily ever after in luxury. All a Woman has to do is be beautiful. Literature and Hollywood made a fortune pandering to this unrealistic Female fantasy, but Men have been burdened by trying to live up to these expectations. The entire Dating Game is based this one sided attitude. A Man is expected to pick a Women up at Her door, take Her out, wine Her and dine Her and otherwise entertain Her; win Her heart and earn Her love. The Man does all the giving, the Women all the taking. This is still the way Women expect to be treated and have shown no intention of changing it no matter how much They screech about Sexual Equality out of the other side of Their face. The last thing you can expect from a Female is to make an equal effort to establish or maintain a relationship.

The attitude of Women that They must be won is the basis one of problems between Men and Women: Sexual harassment. This can be demonstrated by the kind of romance novels and movies that Women are so fond of; and the Doris Day movies epitomize the situation. They almost always follow the same scenario: Boy sees Girl and falls in love. Boy approaches Girl will cleaver opening line, but is rebuffed. Boy is open, friendly, witty and charming. Girl is a Bitch. Boy launches a campaign to win Her heart, and after many rejections finally succeeds, earns Her love and They live happily ever after. This is not only a ridiculous way for two grown people to behave but it has given Men the idea that when She says no She really means yes. All He has to do make enough effort and He will eventually win Her. Women love it when they are pursued by someone They want to be pursued by. Everything goes Her way and She will make it just difficult enough so that He will not lose interest. But if She is pursued by someone She doesn’t want to be pursued by She will probably engage in hysterical screaming about sexual harassment.

This leads to another typical behavior of the traditional Female, blatant emotionalism. Women not only think they have a right to be emotional but an obligation to be emotional at all the right times. Many conflicts between Men and Women begin because Females take umbrage when they feel Men are not appropriately emotional. The position of the Women’s Movement that sexual equality means that Men become more like Women by getting more in touch with Their emotions is, again, the exact opposite of reality. Since it is Females who want to change Their roles and since they want equal access to traditional Male roles it is Women who must change to adapt to these new roles. Women must get control of Their emotions. You can, however, make a pretty good argument that in order control your emotions you must understand them by getting in touch with them, but that doesn’t abrogate the responsibility to let reason and logic prevail.

The court system is currently stacked in favor of Women and, again, They have no intention of changing it no matter how much They screech about sexual equality. In exchange for sex, a Women is entitled to half of everything a Man owns just for starters. If Children are involved the price goes up. The marriage licence is, in fact, a licence for Women to steal. The one gain Men have made in the quest for equality is the reduction of alimony payments to Women. Women have compensated for this by using Children as a financial lever. The statement “Women and Their Children” was intentionally used to show that Children belong to Her. The way that it is coming out of the court system today is that She gets the Kids, the house and the car; He gets the bills and visitation rights. In better than eighty percent of court cases She gets sole custody of the Children, He gets sole custody of the bills. Women view Children as Theirs and They want to have it both ways; parental privileges to Females, financial responsibility to Males.

Parental responsibility is one of the most important issues of our time. Children are suffering in larger numbers today due directly to parental irresponsibility. More and more Men are not being responsible for Child support, but why should They if the Children are not Theirs. If Women want sole custody of the Children that should include the financial responsibility as well, especially under the harsh light of sexual equality. If Women want Men to share the financial responsibility, then They must share custody. The fact that Women are trying to have it both ways is the biggest obstacle to resolving this issue. In addition to this Women are all to willing to use Children as a weapon against Their former Spouses. Mothers encourage Children to take sides in Their disputes. Constant brainwashing of “your Father this and you Father that” further exacerbates this problem.

This is just one of the ways in which the traditional Female uses Children to Her own advantage. Women have a history of purposely becoming pregnant by a Man who can be sued for big bucks in court. Hugh Hefner, for example was a constant victim of paternity suits by sexually exploitive Females. It can be said for certain that Playmates make a living exploiting their sexuality.

This most insidious use of Children by Women is occurring in the welfare system. All to often a Girl born in poverty and raised on welfare will drop out of school thereby guaranteeing herself no future. What does She do for an income? Drop a Kid. If She wants a raise She’ll drop another one. Welfare was designed to aid Children, but Women are lumping themselves in with the Children, giving Themselves the advantages of Children and abusing the system. This means that the non-achievers are breeding themselves at a higher rate than the achievers and demanding that the achievers subsidize Their irresponsible reproduction. It is these Children that are terrorizing poor neighborhoods and lowering the test scores in schools. Even worse, more and more the welfare money is not being spent on the Children, but is being spent on drug abuse by the mother and the Kids are being born drug addicted. The failure of the Women’s Movement to focus on the Females responsibility in Parenting further detracts from Their credibility.

The Liberated Women

The one thing that Women do want to change is Women’s status in the work place, and seems to be the only thing that most Women can agree on. But even here the application of “Equality” focuses on only those aspects of the work place that are attractive to Females. Since Women also want to retain the right of assuming the traditional Female role, They are trying to have it both ways. Notice that Women as a class have no responsibilities and this is the true meaning of the liberated Woman. They are not required to support themselves, nor required do housework even if they don’t work. They are not required to be full time mothers to Their Children. They are not required to take part in national defence or any of the other dirty, nasty jobs that Men do that to make this country the most desirable place to live in since the birth of the Human Race. What They want is equal, or preferential, access to all of the best things in life. This smorgasbord of privileges and prerogatives for Women is possible because Men still retain the traditional responsibilities of protecting, defending and providing for Women and Their Children as well as for Themselves.

Two major changes in our society have precipitated this change in attitude. The first is the fact that Women now have total control over Their reproduction. The average number of Children has dropped to a little over two per Female and even less for the affluent. Add to that all the labor saving devices that are available and Housewives have found themselves with a lot of unused time and energy on Their hands.

Second, now that the work place has become a lot more civilized and all those nice cushy air conditioned office jobs have become available, Women have decided to expend that energy in the work place. As Their number increased, so did the complaints that They are not equally represented in management. You never hear Them complain that They are not equally represented in the coal mines, or the steel mills, or in heavy construction, or in any of the other dirty, nasty jobs that Men do that make Women’s life so comfortable. The more Women have demanded equality, the longer and redder Their fingernails have become. These hands convey they message that they no longer do Women’s work, but they don’t do Men’s work either. In fact, they don’t do anything whereby “I might break a naaaail !!!”. They want to be Boss though.

People in positions of responsibility and authority are not allowed the luxury of collapsing in an emotion heap in a crisis. People in positions of responsibility and authority are required to use their brains and make calm rational decisions when they are under pressure. People who can’t do this have no business being in positions of responsibility and authority. Men are taught to control Their emotions because they are being groomed to attain these positions. Few Men have this ability and the competition to rise to the top is designed to weed out the ones who can’t, among other things. Women, as a class, have failed to make a commitment to control Their emotions and engage in logical, rational thinking. The attitude by Females That they can continue to be the emotional basket cases They’ve always been and still be given equal access to positions of responsibility and authority further demonstrate the dishonesty and duplicity of Women.
It is also unrealistic to think that it is the world that has to adapt to suit Women. A graphic case in point occurred in Russia not long ago. The Gorbechevs found themselves the victims of a coup attempt and thought it probable that they would be killed. After it was all over Raisa collapsed in an emotional heap and ended up in a hospital for several weeks. What would the world have thought if Machael couldn’t show himself for weeks afterward? He would have been politically dead immediately. Raisa demonstrated how uncommitted and unsuited she was to hold the position as the Female partner of the Soviet leadership.

Women have also demonstrated that, as a class, they are less committed to the work place than Men. Children will result in lower productivity as Women attempt to “Have it all”, or they will leave to take the mommy track. They may also leave the work place if they find a sucker that will sign up to support Them in a style They can become accustomed, thereby wasting the investment made by the employer in training Them. Indeed, too many Women view the work place as the best social environment, the perfect place to find such a Man. In office jobs, Women can sit around in Their fancy in-style cloths and Their in-style hair-dos and Their long painted finger nails, like so much sexual bait on a hook, and troll for that Knight in Shining Armor that will offer them early retirement. Housewives also view the work place as a social environment because most of them are bored at home and work offers them social contact, income of Their own and work that gives them a feeling of accomplishment. This is not a bad thing, but they are not committed and have a history of leaving the job when discontented. To Men, however, work is not just the place were he provides for Himself, his Wife and his Children, it is the yardstick by which he is measured. A Man is his work and although He may also leave a company, He is usually totally dedicated to His work.

The biggest complaint that Women have about the work place is, of course, that they do not receive equal pay for equal work. Some of the reasons for this are stated above, but the main reason is that Men still have the responsibility to support parasitic Females. Women fail to mention that around half Their number still retain the privilege of being supported by Men. The main reason for this is so they can stay home with the Children and so the financial responsibility is even greater as Men must support a Woman and Her Children. While many single Mothers also have Children to support they are seldom supporting parasitic Males at the same time, and not required to do so by social custom. People are not paid because of Their needs, but because of Their contributions and there is no way to make it perfectly fair. Most Men do have Wives and if you total all the money earned by Men and Women, most of the money is spent by or on Women and Their Children. How else can Women spend so much time in Their favorite pastime: shopping. Never has there been a race of people so good at spending money, especially someone else’s money. They should not expect to earn equal pay until they make an equal commitment to the work place and stop sexually exploiting Men for a living.

Recently many wives have begun to complain that They have no choice and must work to make ends meet. These women have suddenly found themselves with more “Equality” than they bargained for, and they don’t like it. Like Men, They are required to work for a living. Women have only Themselves to blame for this because the rise in the two income family was the engine which drove inflation in the 70’s and 80’s. Two income families drove up the price of housing and other commodities. One income families are now at a disadvantage for competition for scarce resources. This is often a double whammy since one income families are generally making a commitment to parenting and have more mouths to feed. As usual, Women have admitted no responsibility for this predicament. The decline of the traditional family must be placed on the rise of Women in work place.

The Primitive Female

The problem is that Women are trying to change, in a single generation, feminine roles and attitudes that have evolved over the last five million years. This number has been referenced throughout the article because it is the time scientists have determined that Humans diverged from Their ancestral line. It is during this time that Humans have developed Their unique characteristics and Females have had a major role in shaping this evolution. Women now want to undo what they have worked so hard to establish. Therefore, it is Their own attitudes and behaviors that must change and it is time They took responsibility for this and stop blaming only Men for the predicament they find Themselves in.

Pre-Human culture was very similar to modern Chimpanzee culture. It must be remembered that Humans did not evolve from Monkeys or, more correctly, Chimpanzees. Chimpanzees have evolved along Their own lines for the last five million years. We share common ancestors, but Chimpanzee culture has not changed dramatically from the ancestral one. Jane Goodall studied Chimpanzee culture in order to gain insight into the forces that shaped Human evolution.

Chimpanzee culture is similar to most mammalian social cultures: a male dominated sexual dichotomy. Males and females are in fact equal in strength. Male strength is directed outwardly toward defense while female strength is directed inwardly toward reproduction. Males are locked in eternal conflict among themselves for dominance and breeding rights. Nature has determined that the best formula for reproduction is that all females reproduce but only the most fit males are allowed to reproduce. This will maximize the birthrate and will ensure that the next generation of males can successfully defend the group from predators. This and the conflict between predator and prey is one of the natural selection processes that drive evolution, making the next generation bigger, stronger, faster and smarter. There are, however, two aspects of Human evolution that have baffled anthropologists.

The first is how Human Beings came to walk on two legs. All other mammals are quadrupedal including Chimpanzees. Why was it advantageous for Humans to become bipedal? One theory proposes that as we came down out of the trees to live on the savanna we had to stand on Our hind legs to see over the tall grass. However, baboons are savanna dwellers and are the most quadrupedal of all large primates. For this and other reasons this theory, although widely accepted, is unsatisfactory. Another theory suggests that bipedalism made us better hunters and gave us more endurance. The best hunters, however, are quadrupedal with much more endurance than Humans. The real reason for Human bipedalism will be found elsewhere.

The second aspect of Human evolution that has baffled anthropologists is why Human Females have lost estrus. All other mammalian females go through estrus, or heat as it is called in our pets, and is the period of maximum female sexual receptivity. Once a female is impregnated she stops having estrus cycles and is not sexually available again until she is ready to conceive. A Women’s period is a vestige of this estrus cycle. Every month, in concert with ovulation, a Woman will have a period until She becomes pregnant, and will stop having periods until She is ready to become pregnant again. However, unlike other mammalian females, the Human Female is sexually available all of the time. Why????

C. Owen Lovejoy linked these two developments into an evolutionary package in which Women used sex as an inducement to encourage Men to provision Them. The only way Men had to carry food back to the Female was to carry it in Their hands. Men learned to walk on Their hind legs in order to free Their hands for this purpose. Males who did this were rewarded with sex and this could only occur if Females were sexually available all of the time. This is the key evolutionary step that separated Humans from Their relatives and led to all of the hallmark achievements in Human evolution. However, it is clear that it is Women who have been making a living sexually exploiting Men for the last five million years. The effort of the Women’s Movement to depict Themselves as the poor little dears who are being sexually exploited is typical of Their dishonesty and duplicity.

None of this happened for the benefit of Males or Females. It occurred because it benefited the Human species as a whole. Male Chimpanzees, as with most other mammalian males, do not provision females. Females are expected to provision themselves. If they are pregnant or are nursing young then they must forage for two, and will not enter estrus and be sexually available until they are ready to support another pregnancy. This may be as much as four years, most likely after the child is weaned. It may vary according to the food supply and the Females body fat content. There have been cases of Human Females who have lowered their body fat content to the point to which They stopped having periods. It seems to be the bodies way of saying that you cannot support a pregnancy. With Males provisioning Females the Human population skyrocketed. Females can now become pregnant every year and can support three Children, one in the womb and two at the breast. Our reproductive rate exceeded Our relative’s by as much as a factor of four and thus began the process of Humans overpopulating the earth.

The process of Women sexually exploiting Men for a living was refined over the millennia to the point where the first law of Womenhood is never, ever, give it away, always demand compensation for sex. In Our culture especially, Men always pay Women for sex. The mainstay of the dating game is taking a Women to dinner. The more elegantly, extravagantly and expensively a Man demonstrates to a Woman His ability to provision Her, the more sexually aroused She becomes. Women still judge a Man by what kind of provider He is. The current price for casual sex is at least three dinners and a movie, but this is only for starters. Women sell their sexuality like drug dealers sell drugs. It is relatively cheap at first, but as the user becomes addicted, the price goes up. Eventually She demands “total commitment”, which means His signature on a marriage contract which entitles Her to half of everything He owns just for starters. What She wants as payment for sex is lifetime financial security.

A classic example of this was depicted in the movie “Pretty Woman”. It has to be assumed that it’s extreme popularity was due to the fact that it appealed to today’s Women. It was a story of a whore who sold her body to anyone who met her price, but was reformed by love. At least that is the way Women saw it. What really happened is that She sensed that He was falling in love with her and she simply upped her price. She demanded the whole “fairy tale”. She wanted to be courted and wooed, but mostly, she wanted to see his signature on a marriage contract. If he didn’t meet her price she was going to go away and have nothing to do with him. The last thing she was going to do is make her own living, on her own two feet instead of on her back, and make love to this man openly, honestly and without compensation, simply because she loved him. This is the last thing you can expect from any Woman despite all Their screeching about sexual equality. The reason that the so called proper Female can’t abide prostitutes is that they don’t charge enough. Why should a Man sign up for a lifetime financial commitment if He can get sex on a pay as you go basis? The heroin’s reformation came because she began to charge the excepted price for sex.

It is understandable why things became so extreme. In the beginning, the food requirement for pre-human males and females were the same. Although females had to provide for two, males needed just as much or even more food because they were larger and spent a lot of energy fighting among themselves for breeding status. Since eating was simply a matter of foraging for it, females were not at a disadvantage. Indeed, in some animal cultures, the dominant males spend so much time and energy maintaining their status that they have little time to feed and can not build up enough reserves to survive the winter or other harsh times; they live on, though, in their offspring and this provides the incentive. As the new Human condition became established, and as Human populations exploded, Women who didn’t have help in providing for Their Children became more at a disadvantage. Since nature responded to the provisioning of Females by increasing Their reproduction rate, Women became increasingly dependant on Men. Child bearing became more of a burden to the point that a growing number of Women began to fear and loath sex. This fear and loathing of sex exists, to some extent, in most Women and has led to a very bad attitude about sex and has further widened the schism between Men and Women. If not for the fact that nature has endowed Women with a Maternal drive that is equal in strength to Men’s sex drive the future of the Human race would be in jeopardy.

This was beautifully depicted in the book “The World According to Garp”. Jenny Fields hated sex but wanted a child. She had to be respected, though, because she took responsibility for herself and her son. Most Women who don’t like sex take the approach of the mother of the little girl who taught young Garp about sex. She explained to Garp that he was supposed to tear her cloths off even though she always “had a headache”. In other words, most of these Women still want to sexually exploit some man into providing for herself and her children, but do all they can to avoid sex. That is one reason why many women want to be virgins before they get married. It is better not to let Men know that They are not going to get what They are paying for.

Speaking of not getting what your paying for brings up the subject of breast implantations. The sole reason for cosmetic breast implantations is to be sexually attractive to Men. This enhances a Women’s ability to sexually exploit Men for a living. A Woman who intends to support herself without relying on sex has no reason for having large breasts. Women’s attempt to blame Men for the medical problems They are currently facing is another example of the dishonesty and duplicity of Women. Women are exploiting a weakness in Men and reaping the financial gains. While much can be said about the ethics of the medical profession for not making it a safer procedure, nothing is being said the ethics of Women.

The key event that triggered the Women’s Movement is the development of birth control. This has given Women total control over Their reproduction and has liberated Women from the ancient dependance upon Men to provision Them. While Women have been quick to take advantage of the freedom and new opportunities this event precipitated, They have been extremely slow in giving up the traditional privileges and prerogatives that were afforded Them because of it. Women still retain a very bad attitude about sex. It is time Women developed an attitude about sex more equal to that of Men.

It is clear that it is Women have been making a living sexually exploiting Men. Men always pay Women for sex, and Women have shown little intention of changing this. While this was acceptable in a sexual dichotomy, the light of sexual equality casts Women as a race of whores and parasites. Men are obliged to pay to just look at a nude Female, and it is the height of Female hypocrisy to charge that magazines and clubs who provide this service are sexually exploiting Women. These Women make a living doing this and get away with it because of the extremely bad attitude most “decent” Women have about sex. If Women had a healthy attitude about sex this business would die and there would be much more loving in the world.

The marriage licence has evolved into a licence for Women to steal, especially in community property states. The amount of money which passes from Men to Women because of it is obscene in the light of sexual equality. It is the price Wives demand for sex as can be demonstrated by the fact the contract is not validated until it is consummated by sex. Take Ivana Trump for example. What was her price? She fancied herself a one billion dollar whore but had to settle for ten million. Poor baby. The justification for this is often Children, who should be raised in proportion to Their Father’s income, but the Children are not allowed to take this money when they leave home. It is the Wives money as Her price for sex and She has it both ways. She gets the Children and the Man’s money. This is another way in which Women exploit Children for financial gain. It is why They seek out rich Men to marry, and have no intention of changing the system no matter how much they screech about sexual equality out of the other side of Their face. If left to Women this will change only when the money begins to flow from Women to Men.

The Women’ Movement has lost credibility because They have failed to address these issues. Men and an increasing number of Women are aware of the dishonesty and duplicity of the Movement. The focus of the Movement upon Men and how Men only must change in order to achieve sexual equality is causing the backlash. Before Women will be accepted as equals by Men, all Women must accept equal responsibility and must give up Their ancient lifestyle of being whores and parasites.