I have come full circle. In 1987 I attended a three day gathering of Meher Baba followers in Portland. From all over the world they came. When I returned to Blue River Oregon, my kindred, Michael Dundon, handed me a new Bible. Within is found the genealogy of Jesus. Meher Baba claimed he was Jesus in a past life. Meher Baba is a real person who had real disciples.Many people claim Pharamond descends from Jesus. Who carries the Davidic blood, his mother, or father? New research claims Pharamond was the grandson of Priarios de Toxandrie ‘the Parthian’. Meher Baba’s parents were Parthians and Zoroastrians.

Septimus Claudius Pharamondus Varasdates (Pharamond) married Argota ? (Cambri de Rosomoni) also known as Rosamond, of the tribe of Cimri, to form the Sicambrian Franks who were the kings of France.

“Origin of the Sicambrian Franks

It appears that the migratory people later identified as the Sicambrians who merged with the Franks originated in the territory of Syunak (Siak). And were set in motion in the late 4th century by a series of political battles between the Persian and Roman empires.”

For fifteen years I have claimed that Meher Baba sent me on my Quest for the Holy Grail, and the source of the name, Rosamond. People thought I was nuts – deluded – when I invoked the name of my Teacher.

The Romans, Parthians, and the Jews – all worshipped Mithra in some fashion. I believe these three peoples fought battles that were religious schisms to see who would rule the world. The legend of Mithra and Jesus is almost identical. The family name ‘Rosamond’ Rose of the World, is right there, at the apex of real human history that changed the world forever. Have I untied the Gordian Knot?

I believe the Legend of Pharamond is based upon Shapur who defeated the Roman Emperor Valerian. My enemy are the slave masters of the neo-Confederate Evangelical Party.

“The colossal statue of Shapur I standing in the Shapur cave, is one of the most impressive sculptures of the Sassanid dynasty.”

Have I awoken the King in the Mountain, Shapur. Will the King of Kings reign in Iran once more?

Jon Presco

Copyright 2012

Priarios de Toxandrie (the Parthian) b. 324? d. > May 378?
From Rodovid EN
Person:31285
Jump to: navigation, search
Full Tree
Descendants (Inventory)
Lineage
Arshakuni
Sex
Male
Full name (at birth)
Priarios de Toxandrie
Other last names
the Parthian
Other given names
Priarius, Priscus, Papos, Palagorius
Parents
♂ # Rostam (Rustam) ? (Rhadamistus) [Arshakuni]
♂ # Tiberius Julius Rhadamsades I ? [Volturi] d. 323
♀ Zenobia ? (Daughter of Mithridates) [?]
Reference numbers
GEDCOM::ComteLeBeux-b.ged::INDI @I1345@::SylvainComte, RIN::060804141741ohmiGed#sylvaincomte794834
[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]
Events
324? birth: from Parthia
marriage: ♀ # Merowna ? (de Thuringe) [Nannau] b. 367? d. 407?
occupation: Roi franc en Toxandrie
> May 378? death:
380? child birth: Pontus, ♀ # Eviene (Juliane) ? (Lady of Nannaue) [Arshakuni] b. 380?
Notes
Early researchers of the middle ages, eager to establish a link to the heros of the Trojan war, often conflate Priarios (Priamus) with Priam of Troy. However, this person is an entirely historical Armenian general (an attested contemporary of Mellobaude) allied with the Persian Empire in North Eastern Europe/Western Asia.
The father of this person is alternately identified as Rostam and Rhadamistus. The histories of these two men have legendary and historical elements. Rhadamistus is an historical person however he flourished nearly 2 centuries before Priarios. As a Parthian General, and husband of Zenobia, Rustam falls within the correct time period but his story has become obscured by legendary material from prior heroic characters also named Rostam. My conclusion is that Priarios was the son of Rostam and Zenobia and that the obscure Iberian Diarchy of Rok [Rostam] and Mihrdat existed briefly during the interim migratory period following the reign of Parsman (Pharasmanes II) Kueli and Parsman Avaz (General Farasman of the Avars).

Jesus as a Reincarnation of Mithra
The Vatican was built upon the grounds previously devoted to the worship of Mithra (600 B.C.). The Orthodox Christian hierarchy is nearly identical to the Mithraic version. Virtually all of the elements of Orthodox Christian rituals, from miter, wafer, water baptism, alter, and doxology, were adopted from the Mithra and earlier pagan mystery religions. The religion of Mithra preceded Christianity by roughly six hundred years. Mithraic worship at one time covered a large portion of the ancient world. It flourished as late as the second century. The Messianic idea originated in ancient Persia and this is where the Jewish and Christian concepts of a Savior came from. Mithra, as the sun god of ancient Persia, had the following karmic similarities with Jesus:

Identical Life Experiences

(1)
Mithra was born on December 25th as an offspring of the Sun. Next to the gods Ormuzd and Ahrimanes, Mithra held the highest rank among the gods of ancient Persia. He was represented as a beautiful youth and a Mediator. Reverend J. W. Lake states: “Mithras is spiritual light contending with spiritual darkness, and through his labors the kingdom of darkness shall be lit with heaven’s own light; the Eternal will receive all things back into his favor, the world will be redeemed to God. The impure are to be purified, and the evil made good, through the mediation of Mithras, the reconciler of Ormuzd and Ahriman. Mithras is the Good, his name is Love. In relation to the Eternal he is the source of grace, in relation to man he is the life-giver and mediator” (Plato, Philo, and Paul, p. 15).
(2)
He was considered a great traveling teacher and masters. He had twelve companions as Jesus had twelve disciples. Mithras also performed miracles.
(3)
Mithra was called “the good shepherd, “the way, the truth and the light, redeemer, savior, Messiah.” He was identified with both the lion and the lamb.
(4)
The International Encyclopedia states: “Mithras seems to have owed his prominence to the belief that he was the source of life, and could also redeem the souls of the dead into the better world … The ceremonies included a sort of baptism to remove sins, anointing, and a sacred meal of bread and water, while a consecrated wine, believed to possess wonderful power, played a prominent part.”
(5)
Chambers Encyclopedia says: “The most important of his many festivals was his birthday, celebrated on the 25th of December, the day subsequently fixed — against all evidence — as the birthday of Christ. The worship of Mithras early found its way into Rome, and the mysteries of Mithras, which fell in the spring equinox, were famous even among the many Roman festivals. The ceremonies observed in the initiation to these mysteries — symbolical of the struggle between Ahriman and Ormuzd (the Good and the Evil) — were of the most extraordinary and to a certain degree even dangerous character. Baptism and the partaking of a mystical liquid, consisting of flour and water, to be drunk with the utterance of sacred formulas, were among the inauguration acts.”
(6)
Prof. Franz Cumont, of the University of Ghent, writes as follows concerning the religion of Mithra and the religion of Christ: “The sectaries of the Persian god, like the Christians’, purified themselves by baptism, received by a species of confirmation the power necessary to combat the spirit of evil; and expected from a Lord’s supper salvation of body and soul. Like the latter, they also held Sunday sacred, and celebrated the birth of the Sun on the 25th of December…. They both preached a categorical system of ethics, regarded asceticism as meritorious and counted among their principal virtues abstinence and continence, renunciation and self-control. Their conceptions of the world and of the destiny of man were similar. They both admitted the existence of a Heaven inhabited by beatified ones, situated in the upper regions, and of a Hell, peopled by demons, situated in the bowels of the Earth. They both placed a flood at the beginning of history; they both assigned as the source of their condition, a primitive revelation; they both, finally, believed in the immortality of the soul, in a last judgment, and in a resurrection of the dead, consequent upon a final conflagration of the universe” (The Mysteries of Mithras, pp. 190, 191).
(7)
Reverend Charles Biggs stated: “The disciples of Mithra formed an organized church, with a developed hierarchy. They possessed the ideas of Mediation, Atonement, and a Savior, who is human and yet divine, and not only the idea, but a doctrine of the future life. They had a Eucharist, and a Baptism, and other curious analogies might be pointed out between their system and the church of Christ (The Christian Platonists, p. 240).
(8)
In the catacombs at Rome was preserved a relic of the old Mithraic worship. It was a picture of the infant Mithra seated in the lap of his virgin mother, while on their knees before him were Persian Magi adoring him and offering gifts.
(9)
He was buried in a tomb and after three days he rose again. His resurrection was celebrated every year.
(10)
McClintock and Strong wrote: “In modern times Christian writers have been induced to look favorably upon the assertion that some of our ecclesiastical usages (e.g., the institution of the Christmas festival) originated in the cultus of Mithraism. Some writers who refuse to accept the Christian religion as of supernatural origin, have even gone so far as to institute a close comparison with the founder of Christianity; and Dupuis and others, going even beyond this, have not hesitated to pronounce the Gospel simply a branch of Mithraism” (Art. “Mithra”).
(11)
Mithra had his principal festival on what was later to become Easter, at which time he was resurrected. His sacred day was Sunday, “the Lord’s Day.” The Mithra religion had a Eucharist or “Lord’s Supper.”
(12)
The Christian Father Manes, founder of the heretical sect known as Manicheans, believed that Christ and Mithra were one. His teaching, according to Mosheim, was as follows: “Christ is that glorious intelligence which the Persians called Mithras … His residence is in the sun” (Ecclesiastical History, 3rd century, Part 2, ch. 5).

“I am a star which goes with thee and shines out of the depths.” – Mithraic saying

“I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright morning star.” – Jesus, (Rev. 22:16)

Some critics of Christianity teach that the Christian religion was not based upon divine revelation but that it borrowed from pagan sources, Mithra being one of them. They assert that the figure of Mithra has many commonalities with Jesus, too common to be coincidence.
Mithraism was one of the major religions of the Roman Empire which was derived from the ancient Persian god of light and wisdom. The cult of Mithraism was quite prominent in ancient Rome, especially among the military. Mithra was the god of war, battle, justice, faith, and contract. According to Mithraism, Mithra was called the son of God, was born of a virgin, had disciples, was crucified, rose from the dead on the third day, atoned for the sins of mankind, and returned to heaven. Therefore, the critics maintain that Christianity borrowed its concepts from the Mithra cult. But is this the case? Can it be demonstrated that Christianity borrowed from the cult of Mithra as it developed its theology?
First of all, Christianity does not need any outside influence to derive any of its doctrines. All the doctrines of Christianity exists in the Old Testament where we can see the prophetic teachings of Jesus as the son of God (Zech. 12:10), born of a virgin (Isaiah 7:14), was crucified (Psalm 22), the blood atonement (Lev. 17:11), rose from the dead (Psalm 16:10), and salvation by faith (Hab. 2:4). Also, the writers of the gospels were eyewitnesses (or directed by eyewitnesses as were Mark and Luke) who accurately represented the life of Christ. So, what they did was write what Jesus taught as well as record the events of His life, death, and resurrection. In other words, they recorded history, actual events and had no need of fabrication or borrowing.

Priarios de Toxandrie (the Parthian) b. 324? d. > May 378?
From Rodovid EN
Person:31285
Jump to: navigation, search
Full Tree
Descendants (Inventory)
Lineage
Arshakuni
Sex
Male
Full name (at birth)
Priarios de Toxandrie
Other last names
the Parthian
Other given names
Priarius, Priscus, Papos, Palagorius
Parents
♂ # Rostam (Rustam) ? (Rhadamistus) [Arshakuni]
♂ # Tiberius Julius Rhadamsades I ? [Volturi] d. 323
♀ Zenobia ? (Daughter of Mithridates) [?]
Reference numbers
GEDCOM::ComteLeBeux-b.ged::INDI @I1345@::SylvainComte, RIN::060804141741ohmiGed#sylvaincomte794834
[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]
Events
324? birth: from Parthia
marriage: ♀ # Merowna ? (de Thuringe) [Nannau] b. 367? d. 407?
occupation: Roi franc en Toxandrie
> May 378? death:
380? child birth: Pontus, ♀ # Eviene (Juliane) ? (Lady of Nannaue) [Arshakuni] b. 380?
Notes
Early researchers of the middle ages, eager to establish a link to the heros of the Trojan war, often conflate Priarios (Priamus) with Priam of Troy. However, this person is an entirely historical Armenian general (an attested contemporary of Mellobaude) allied with the Persian Empire in North Eastern Europe/Western Asia.
The father of this person is alternately identified as Rostam and Rhadamistus. The histories of these two men have legendary and historical elements. Rhadamistus is an historical person however he flourished nearly 2 centuries before Priarios. As a Parthian General, and husband of Zenobia, Rustam falls within the correct time period but his story has become obscured by legendary material from prior heroic characters also named Rostam. My conclusion is that Priarios was the son of Rostam and Zenobia and that the obscure Iberian Diarchy of Rok [Rostam] and Mihrdat existed briefly during the interim migratory period following the reign of Parsman (Pharasmanes II) Kueli and Parsman Avaz (General Farasman of the Avars).

Tiberius Julius Saromates (Suomar) ? (Sunno the Frank) b. 320? d. 401
From Rodovid EN
Person:31286
Jump to: navigation, search
Full Tree
Descendants (Inventory)
Lineage
Volturi
Sex
Male
Full name (at birth)
Tiberius Julius Saromates (Suomar) ?
Other last names
Sunno the Frank
Other given names
Syunik (Albanian), Sunno (French), Sanasar of Mihr (Arabic), Valinak Siak
Parents
♂ # Tiberius Julius Rhadamsades I ? [Volturi] d. 323
[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]
Events
320? birth:
369 birth: Province of Siak, Overtaken by the Persian Empire
child birth: ♀ Pharandzem [Marzpanate]
occupation: Général Franco-Allemagne
345? child birth: ♂ # Septimus Claudius Pharamondus Varasdates (Pharamond) [Mihran/Merovingan] b. 345? d. 398
357? other: Battle of Argentovaria
401 death:
Notes
History of Syunak (A province in dispute between the Roman and Persian Empire)
The first known governor of the province was Valinak Siak (c. 330 – 369) [Sunno the Frank]. The province was occupied by the Persian Empire, c. 369. Siak’s successor was his brother Andok (b.c. 340) who was later removed by the Persians in order to establish a more loyal Persian dynasty in his place. However in 379 with the aid of Rome, in particular the Mamikonian emperors, young King Babik (the son of Andok) was re-established as a Roman allied ruler. Babik’s mother Pharantzem, daughter of Valinak Siak and acting regent in during the minority of her son Babik, re-married to Gnel, nephew of Arshak II, King of Armenia. This regency lasted for less than ten years until 389.
With the crisis of leadership a vast number of refugees were fled toward the territory occupied by the Franks and Alans who at the time were engaged by Rome as territorial foederati. Under the leadership they florished in a semi organized culturally identified quasi military unit under the leadership of Valinak (c. 400-409) Upon the death of Valinak in 409, leadership of this migrant nation and its military units was assumed by Vasak (409-452) [a son/grandson of Radimistus]. Vasak had two sons, Bagben and Bakur, and a daughter who married Vasak’s successor, Varazvahan [Paranzemund](452-472) the son of Valinak Siak. Varazvahan’s great grandson [Claudius] Gelehon ruled from 470 to 477 and died in 483. Babik (Bagben) a descendant of Varazvahan’s brother in law, became the new king in 477. [Claudius Hadrianus] Hadz, brother of Gelehon, died on September 25, 482.
The original province of Syunik was later ruled by other, related, governors but their kinship ties to Valinak Siak remain uncertain: Vahan c. 570, Philipo c. 580, Stephanos c. 590-597, Sahak c. 597, and Grigor until 640. ~~~~
Origin of the Sicambrian Franks
It appears that the migratory people later identified as the Sicambrians who merged with the Franks originated in the territory of Syunak (Siak). And were set in motion in the late 4th century by a series of political battles between the Persian and Roman empires.

Argota ? (Cambri de Rosomoni) b. 376
From Rodovid EN
Person:107618
Jump to: navigation, search
Full Tree
Descendants (Inventory)
Lineage
?
Sex
Female
Full name (at birth)
Argota ?
Other last names
Cambri de Rosomoni
Parents
♂ # Genebald [Cambrai] b. 354? d. 419
[1]
Events
376 birth: França
title: Rainha dos Francos Salianos
residence: wurtemburg
~ 390 child birth: ♂ w Clodius (Clovis) Capillatus (Long Hair) (de Salii) [Merovingian] b. ~ 390 d. 450?
390 child birth: Nobre, ♂ w Fredemund (Varasdates) de Nuestria [Merovingian] b. 390
390? child birth: ♂ # Faramarz (Faramir) ? (Pharamond) [?] b. 390?
405 child birth: Westphalia, Germany, ♂ Adelbertus (Athelbert) de Moselle [Merovingian] b. 405 d. 491
[edit] Sources

http://en.rodovid.org/wk/Person:31404