Image: Detail from “The Fall of Man” by Hugo van der Goes (after 1479)
I was raised Catholic and heard Latin during mass. I walked out of my first confession because I didn’t tell the Good Father I masturbated 81 times since I could get an errection, and his was – PISSED! Why? Well, it has everything to do with the Original Sin that OUR PRESIDENTS KNOWS ABOUT! Biden believes the main purpose in life is to cleanse your dirty evil penis of Eve’s Sex-filth so when you stand before Saint Peter he can MEASRURE how sex-Filthy you are. Too much Eve-Filth, and you are not going to be admitted into heaven, but, you are going to be – CAST INTO HELL!
Last night, Biden did not ask Trump if he was…..AN ADULTERER, We could have heard this
“You claim YOU are te Law and Order President, but, do you believe in the Ten Commandments? Apparently not. You believe it is just fine to grab a woman’s pussy against her will, and sleep with a Porn Star while you are married! That’s COMMITTING ADULTERY in my bool!”
It will come out in the history books, that Biden took a Catholic Stance with Donald after he was elected. He was going to allow The Pope, Jesus, and God to forgive Trump – while he worked on his High Catholic Report Card so he can be recorded as The Best Catholic President – ever! He did not go in for the kill. He did not throw Black Civil Rights, a bone! He ignored The White Radical Bohemian Voter Block. He did not call for the Justice Department to GRAB TRUMP BY THE BALLS – and throw his ass in Jail! Instead, he allowed God and the Pope to walk him out on that stage like an old wooden puppet, with drool leaking out of his mouth!
“Hello! My name is (hack-cough) is…..Good Ol Catholic Joe, and I look foreword to meeting Saint Peter when I (cough-stutter)…….croak!
John Presco
3President Biden embraced a confused-looking Pope Francis at the G7 summit.REUTERS
Biden meets with Pope Francis at G7 summit
Uploaded: Jun 14, 2024
Original sin is the Christian doctrine that holds that humans, through the fact of birth, inherit a tainted nature with a proclivity to sinful conduct in need of regeneration.[1] The biblical basis for the belief is generally found in Genesis 3 (the story of the expulsion of Adam and Eve from the Garden of Eden), in a line in Psalm 51:5 (“I was brought forth in iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me”),[2] and in Paul‘s Epistle to the Romans, 5:12-21 (“Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all people, because all sinned”).[3][1]
This belief began to emerge in the 3rd century, but only became fully formed with the writings of Augustine of Hippo (354–430 AD), who was the first author to use the phrase “original sin” (Latin: peccatum originale).[4][5] Influenced by Augustine, the councils of Carthage (411–418 AD) and Orange (529 AD) brought theological speculation about original sin into the official lexicon of the Church.[6]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Original_sin
Supreme Court rules for Jan. 6 rioter challenging obstruction charge
The closely watched case focuses on a charge that former President Donald Trump also faces in his election interference case.
Supreme Court rules in favor of Jan. 6 rioter challenging obstruction charge
June 28, 2024, 7:48 AM PDT / Updated June 28, 2024, 8:58 AM PDT
By Lawrence Hurley and Ryan J. Reilly
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday ruled in favor of a former police officer who is seeking to throw out an obstruction charge for joining the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021.
The justices in a 6-3 vote on nonideological lines handed a win to defendant Joseph Fischer, who is among hundreds of Jan. 6 defendants — including former President Donald Trump — who have been charged with obstructing an official proceeding over the effort to prevent Congress’ certification of President Joe Biden’s election victory.
The court concluded that the law, enacted in 2002 as part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act after the Enron accounting scandal, was only intended to apply to more limited circumstances involving forms of evidence tampering, not the much broader array of situations that prosecutors had claimed it covered.
The court sent the case back to lower courts for further proceedings on whether the Justice Department could still prosecute Fischer under the new interpretation of the law.
Attorney General Merrick Garland said in a statement that he was disappointed by the decision because of the impact it would have on the Justice Department’s Jan. 6 cases, although he stressed it would not affect the bulk of them.
The ruling “limits an important federal statute that the department has sought to use to ensure that those most responsible for that attack face appropriate consequences,” he added.
Rosamond Press 