Invoking God and Playing God

I recall getting a phone call, or an e-mail, from Joy Gall telling me she wants to consult with me, and my neighbor, Jeanie, about taking John Gall off life support. I never heard from her. I then get a call from Mark Gall telling me Jon was dead. I waited to be told when his funeral would be, and never got a call. Months before I visited Joy at the rest home Jon lived in. She had surgery and was recouping. When I went to see Jon in his room, he got very excited – then pulled the tube out his stomach that kept him alive. I had not seen him in months, and he could talk still. I was with Virginia Hambley. I wondered if Jon was telling me – he does not want to live like this. He was taken to the emergency room at Riverbend. Mark wanted me to go there, but, then changed his mind.

Today I wonder if Jon filled out a Oregon POLST when his attorney set up a Trust for Jon. Did it say NOT to keep him alive? If it did, everything makes sense. I have asked Mark if he is writing a autobiography, with Joy’s help. I got no answer. We have the same attorney. Darian and Ed Fadeley were not invited to Jon’s funeral, either. Why? –

I am seeking a attorney in order to sue the Alabama High Court for invvkig the name and wrath of God. On October 7, 2023 I was at the UofO Library looking for the book on a ruly by the Sanhedrin regarded children born with a birth defect.

John Presco

What is a POLST?

It is a medical form that you may use to turn your wishes for treatment near the end of life into medical orders. Emergency medical personnel will know what you do and do not want done to you during a medical emergency.

POLST (Portable Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) is a way to have and document an important talk with your doctor* about what you would or would not want when you can no longer speak for yourself.

The Unborn Marked As Sinners

Posted on October 6, 2022 by Royal Rosamond Press

“I have come for sinners”

Posted on December 3, 2017 by Royal Rosamond Press

 “To this they replied, “You were steeped in sin at birth; how dare you lecture us!” And they threw him out.”

Jesus made a strange statement that took me fifteen years to solve the riddle in it.

“I have come, not to get the upright, but sinners, so that they may be turned from their sins. ”

When I began to study the Bible at fifty years of age I had no problem with looking at the teaching of the Jews. When I read the Sanhedrin made a law stating no Rabbi need minster to a man or woman premarked a sinner by God while inside their mother’s womb, I had found the key to Jesus’s miracles and Christianity. Jesus came to get rid of this law, and as a Go’El Redeemer put an end to INHERENT SIN FROM THE PARENTS. Jesus declared there were no longer any BORN SINNERS!

This is why Rabbi Jesus died on the cross. This transference of evil from adults to the unborn, was over. Note the father of the boy born blind fears he and his son will be thrown out of the synagogue if they testify Jesus healed this son. There is no death warrant for believing Jesus is the Messiah. This is why Jesus bids them not to tell anyone so they can remain in the Synagogue and be ministered to by a Rabbi.

John ‘The Nazarite’

Everything I write is protected by a special Copyright fashioned for Ministers. With the pending passing of the Tax Bill, that applies the MARK OF THE BEAST to the poor, and gives GOLD to the rich, GOD-L has given me a message to give unto you………

“You have broken my heart!”

“They still did not believe that he had been blind and had received his sight until they sent for the man’s parents. 19 “Is this your son?” they asked. “Is this the one you say was born blind? How is it that now he can see?”

John Ambrose

From:braskewitz@yahoo.com

To:Mark Gall

Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 11:34 AM

My blood-kin, John Wilson, says he founded Harvard in a poem he wrote. You and Joy will regret bumping me from Jon’s funeral, so Greg, the nobody Jesus-freak, can do his thing. He is the honorary Gall family member that Jesus picked for you! I laugh in your faces!

Jon

John Harvard and Shakespeare

John Ambrose 

From:braskewitz@yahoo.com

To:Mark Gall

Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 7:45 AM

Remember that spat I had in the garage with your balding Jesus Freak after he told me how Christian prayers were answered when Republicans took all those seats – and now put a mad man in the White House! Fuck Greg, Joy, and you!

Alabama justice invoked ‘the wrath of a holy God’ in IVF opinion. Is that allowed?

https://s.yimg.com/rx/ev/builds/1.3.3/pframe.html

Trevor Hughes and Minnah Arshad, USA TODAY

Updated Thu, February 22, 2024 at 11:29 a.m. PST·10 min read

An Alabama Supreme Court’s ruling has torn open a long-simmering and emotionally charged debate about whether some aspects of in vitro fertilization represent a form of abortion and should be banned under religious principles.

Christian opposition to abortion has long driven the debate over reproductive rights. Abortion opponents say life begins at conception, and even a handful of cells deserves the same legal protections as a person.

In his concurring opinion last week, Chief Justice Tom Parker, an elected Republican, invoked similar reasoning.

“In summary, the theologically based view of the sanctity of life adopted by the People of Alabama encompasses the following: (1) God made every person in His image; (2) each person therefore has a value that far exceeds the ability of human beings to calculate; and (3) human life cannot be wrongfully destroyed without incurring the wrath of a holy God, who views the destruction of His image as an affront to Himself.”

Alabama Supreme Court Justices arrive during the State of the State address at the Alabama State Capitol in Montgomery, Ala., on Tuesday, Feb. 6, 2024.
Alabama Supreme Court Justices arrive during the State of the State address at the Alabama State Capitol in Montgomery, Ala., on Tuesday, Feb. 6, 2024.

But legal scholars say invocating religion is an unusual step for a judge. And IVF advocates are concerned about injecting religion into what they see as a medical decision to have a family.

“The substance of the ruling is not a surprise at all. But the language he used, it’s completely out of bounds ‒ unusual to an extreme degree,” said Jennifer Hendricks, a law professor and family law expert at the University of Colorado Boulder.

IVF has faced religious opposition from some Christians

It all comes down to a small cluster cells.

On one side of the battle are millions of Americans who used in-vitro fertilization to have desperately wanted children who could otherwise not have been born.

On the other are Christian religious conservatives who argue humans should not be playing God in a laboratory, and that life begins at conception. The Catholic Church in particular opposes IVF, though some religions, including Buddhism and Hinduism, have no hesitations about the procedure.

Several Alabama facilities, including the provider that was sued in the initial case, announced this week that they are pausing their IVF programs.

Although the ruling itself affects only embryos in Alabama, word of the decision has spread quickly across the nation and already is reverberating in Washington. Opinions are highly polarized.

President Joe Biden weighed in with a statement Thursday saying voters should re-elect him if they wanted a different approach to reproductive rights. “The disregard for women’s ability to make these decisions for themselves and their families is outrageous and unacceptable,” he said.  Vice President Kamala Harris also slammed the court’s decision, saying it sets a dangerous precedent for “robbing women of the freedom to decide when and how to build a family.”

But Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley said she agrees with the court’s contention that frozen embryos created through IVF are children. “Embryos, to me, are babies,” Haley told NBC News. “That’s a life.”

Ruling again pits theology against reproductive rights

Some conservative states have passed laws specifying that life begins at conception, and the Alabama court leaned heavily on Christian faith and the Bible to make its case. The court referred to the embryos as “embryonic children … kept alive in a cryogenic nursery.”

Rachel Laser, president and CEO of Washington D.C.-based nonprofit Americans United for Separation of Church and State, said citing the Bible in this manner is like “giving the middle finger to a foundational promise of our country.”

Alabama’s top court ruling on IVF is part of a larger movement to “impose religious theology,” Laser said, in conflict with the constitutional promise of separating church and state. She saw the verdict in Alabama as part of a larger Christian nationalist movement – the idea that America was created by and for Christians an its laws should reflect that.

“The agenda doesn’t stop with reproductive rights. It’s much, much bigger,” Laser said. “And that should concern every American, because America wouldn’t be America without the separation of church and state.”

Laser noted that moral arguments put forth by lawmakers and judges often impose a singular definition of morality on everyone, including people of other faiths and Christians who don’t align with the same set of values or believe they should be imposed by law.

Along with jeopardizing access to IVF and abortions, Laser said the ruling could affect access to contraception, as some forms work by blocking embryos from implanting in the uterus.

“That’s what could come next,” she said.

IVF was a polarizing issue from the start

In 1979, a year after the world’s first IVF baby was born, a coalition of anti-abortion groups denounced the new technology as “morally abhorrent” and persuaded the federal government to block funding for any research in which embryos were destroyed. But the number of what were then referred to as “test tube” babies continued to rise as desperate families turned to IVF to conceive children. Today, about 2% of all babies born in the U.S. annually are conceived through IVF.

“Over the years, the anti-abortion movement gradually accepted some reproductive technologies, as long as no embryos were destroyed during their use,” said Margaret Marsh, a historian and professor at Rutgers University. “But the peace it made with the new technologies was always an uneasy peace.”

Marsh co-wrote a 2019 history of IVF with her sister, a gynecologist.

Because IVF was developed after Roe became the law of the land in 1973, embryos have typically been treated as private property that donors could implant, give away or have destroyed without consequence. But newly passed “personhood” laws pushed by conservatives and some religious groups are changing that.

Nationally, about 100,000 births a year involve IVF, an emotionally and physically exhausting process by which multiple eggs are harvested, fertilized and implanted to bring about a pregnancy. In most cases, doctors create more embryos than are implanted, allowing patients to store those embryos in liquid nitrogen at -321 degrees for future use, donation or destruction.

In the IVF procedure, a three- to five-day-old fertilized egg, known as a blastocyst, is implanted in a woman’s uterus. At this point it contains between 70 and 200 cells.

Those tiny clusters of cells can only develop inside a womb, and officials estimate there may be as many as 1 million frozen embryos stored nationwide.

IVF families have often struggled for years to get pregnant and undergoing expensive IVF treatment typically requires the administration of powerful fertility drugs and invasive medical procedures for the chance to have a baby. People turn to IVF for many reasons, including fertility loss after cancer treatments, or military members heading out on long-term deployments who want to delay having children.

Is it OK for a judge to invoke the Bible?

In a commentary attached to the Alabama ruling, Parker leaned heavily on the religious foundation of American laws, connecting them to longstanding Christian tenets such as the 10 Commandments’ prohibition against murder. Parker noted that other countries have adopted IVF policies that reduce the number of unneeded embryos and suggested that IVF regulations in the United States are little better than “the Wild West.”

Tom Parker, Republican candidate for Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court, arrives to vote at the Cloverdale voting station in Montgomery, Ala., on Tuesday November 6, 2018.
Tom Parker, Republican candidate for Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court, arrives to vote at the Cloverdale voting station in Montgomery, Ala., on Tuesday November 6, 2018.

“The Alabama Constitution’s recognition that human life is an endowment from God emphasizes a foundational principle of English common law, which has been expressly incorporated as part of the law of Alabama,” Parker wrote.

“All three branches of government are subject to a constitutional mandate to treat each unborn human life with reverence,” he continued. “Carving out an exception for the people in this case, small as they were, would be unacceptable to the People of this State, who have required us to treat every human being in accordance with the fear of a holy God who made them in His image.”

The Catholic Church in 1987 issued an opinion setting out its opposition to IVF, arguing in part that it was immoral because it “does violence to human dignity and to the marriage act,” by replacing the act of conception between a married couple with a procedure by a laboratory worker.

“Human beings bear the image and likeness of God. They are to be reverenced as sacred. Never are they to be used as a means to an end, not even to satisfy the deepest wishes of an infertile couple,” the church said. “The marital act is not a manufacturing process, and children are not products.”

Lael Weinberger, a nonresident fellow at Stanford Law School and attorney who previously clerked for U.S. Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch, appointed by former President Donald Trump said the court’s decision did not invoke religion and Parker was simply musing about the history and theology of law in his concurring opinion.

“It can’t be the case that the First Amendment prohibits our courts from grappling with the history of law,” Weinberger said.

Weinberger said the new ruling gives the couples who originally sued another chance to file a wrongful death suit. A lower court had dismissed their claims on the basis that embryos were not considered children.

In this Tuesday, Oct. 2, 2018 photo, containers holding frozen embryos and sperm are stored in liquid nitrogen at a fertility clinic in Fort Myers, Fla. The Alabama Supreme Court ruled, Friday, Feb. 16, 2024, that frozen embryos can be considered children under state law, a ruling critics said could have sweeping implications for fertility treatments. The decision was issued in a pair of wrongful death cases brought by three couples who had frozen embryos destroyed in an accident at a fertility clinic.
In this Tuesday, Oct. 2, 2018 photo, containers holding frozen embryos and sperm are stored in liquid nitrogen at a fertility clinic in Fort Myers, Fla. The Alabama Supreme Court ruled, Friday, Feb. 16, 2024, that frozen embryos can be considered children under state law, a ruling critics said could have sweeping implications for fertility treatments. The decision was issued in a pair of wrongful death cases brought by three couples who had frozen embryos destroyed in an accident at a fertility clinic.More

But Nicole Huberfeld, a law professor at Boston University School of Law, said Parker’s opinion stands out because it references Christian beliefs so significantly.

“The thing is that’s unusual is how overtly this concurrence is relying on Christian sanctity of life reasoning,” she said.

The First Amendment’s Establishment Clause typically limits the role religion can play in government, but the U.S. Supreme Court in 2022 changed the longstanding process by which it reviewed conflicts between government and religion. The decision to change that process was written by Justice Gorsuch, who said the court needed to rely more heavily on “reference to historical practices and understandings.” Parker, the Alabama judge, specifically referenced Gorsuch in his concurrent opinion.

Past Supreme Courts might have objected to Parker’s reliance on religion, but Huberfeld said she’s not sure whether the current conservative majority ‒ which overturned the right to abortion two years ago ‒ would find it problematic.

“Judges are not supposed to rely on religious principles for legal reasoning,” Huberfeld said. “The Alabama Constitution does use the word ‘God.’ But so does the Declaration of Independence.”

Professor Ian Farrell of the University of Denver’s Sturm College of Law said Parker’s opinion is “certainly problematic” because it invokes cherry-picked portions of the Christian faith.Like other experts, he said the judge’s opinion may run afoul of the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause because it so clearly draws from Christian faith to reach a conclusion.  “The Bible tells people to do a lot of crazy stuff,” Farrell said. “It doesn’t strike me as legitimate legal reasoning.”

Religion has always affected the way people interpret the law and played a role in the life of Americans, said Hendricks of UC Boulder. But legal standards have typically kept one specific religion, such as Christianity, from imposing its values on everyone.“The concern a lot of people have is that we’re on a path to theocracy here.”

Lindsay Heller, an IVF mom and partner of the New Jersey-based family law practice at Fox Rothschild LLP, pictured in this undated photo.
Lindsay Heller, an IVF mom and partner of the New Jersey-based family law practice at Fox Rothschild LLP, pictured in this undated photo.

Lindsay Heller, an IVF mom and attorney, said she thanks “whoever is up there” every day for her two kids. But she believes IVF decisions should be between families and doctors ‒ not courts and religion.

“IVF might fall by the wayside if you’re going by someone’s religious values about how life is created,” she said. “A doctor isn’t going to put their license on the line to help someone get pregnant.”

Elizabeth Weise contributed to this report.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: IVF opinion from Alabama justice was overtly religious. Was it OK?

John Ambrose 

From:braskewitz@yahoo.com

To:Mark Gall

Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 7:45 AM

Remember that spat I had in the garage with your balding Jesus Freak after he told me how Christian prayers were answered when Republicans took all those seats – and now put a mad man in the White House! Fuck Greg, Joy, and you!

John Ambrose 

From:braskewitz@yahoo.com

To:Mark Gall

Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 2:19 AM

You and Joy are fake democrats, and warmongers, who kiss Greg’s evangelical Zionist ass. How do you two like your tax-cut?

JERUSALEM — Arab nations and Palestinian officials have warned of dire consequences if the United States recognizes Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, including potential unrest and an end to the peace process, amid last-minute lobbying to prevent President Trump from making the move. 

In a late-night call Sunday, Jordan’s foreign minister, Ayman Safadi, warned Secretary of State Rex Tillerson that such a decision could “trigger anger across the Arab and Muslim world, fuel tension and jeopardize peace efforts,” according to Jordan’s state news agency. 

John Ambrose 

From:braskewitz@yahoo.com

To:Mark Gall

Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 12:03 PM

https://rosamondpress.com/2017/11/22/flaming-hot-hope-hicks/I was right! You are wrong. You, Ed, Joy, ran your frumpy sad-ass Christian witches past me  in a attempt to bring me down. In my autobiography ‘Capturing Beauty’ I saw it all coming, the Lolita Bardot Syndrome sprinkled with the semen and blood of self-righteous bores.

Jon

Flaming Hot – Hope Hicks

John Ambrose 

From:braskewitz@yahoo.com

To:Mark Gall

Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 8:32 PM

I talked to Jeanie tonight. I asked about you and Joy. She said Joy fell a few times, and can not drive. If I can move back to Eugene, I can be her chauffer. You and I can go fishing, again. This is as good as it gets. I was angry at you two in order to stop what was coming. It’s here – in spades! I have contracted 9 people who live, or lived here, today. The window of forgiveness, is open. ‘Love one another”

John 

John Ambrose 

From:braskewitz@yahoo.com

To:Mark Gall

Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 4:48 PM

My Rosemond kindred was very involved with the beautiful Lola Montez. I am now a member of Alcohol Justice a branch of the Buck Trust worth a billion dollars. Your refusal to serve as my Trustee, is huge! Fuck you and your gaggle of  misshapen Jesus-freaks, who use Beautiful and Perfect Jesus as your Weapon-Muse to get even with the beautiful-people. No, this is not an attack on Jesus, but the Uglification of Jesus by ugly people like Greg, Jeanie, Joy, and your Garage Troll. You fit with these, as the non-believer who needs a Beauty Shield. It is not my fault you and your ilk were born UGLY! Why should we pay and suffer to make it work for you. Ugly People should be taxed. They should be made to pay for the health insurance of the Beautiful Ones made beautiful by God! Anyone caught using a Jesus-hex on a member of the Beautiful Race, should be arrested and thrown in a dungeon.

Jon ‘The Beautiful’

Prelude to The World Holy Word War

Posted on October 7, 2023 by Royal Rosamond Press

Yesterday, on October 6, 2023, I went to the Knight Library to look for a book I found twenty years ago, that proves Jesus was a Priest overturning rulings by the Sanhedrin. He was not a prophet, or a Zealot, though I believe his judgements were the PRELUDE to the War of the Jews against Rome. When his revolt was defeated, his history was altered to keep the suppression of his followers – going – as long as it takes. The suppression of Jesus ‘The Freedom Fighter’ led to the attack on Israel – on the Sabbat. I did not find that book, but took this pic of me amongst a wall of books about the Jews. I knew my prophecies were about to come true. I am for Reformed Judaism which is being demonized by Israelis.

When I left the library, I thought about my ex-friend, Mark Gall, who was the head of the Department of Education at the University of Oregon. I could see the building he worked in when we first met. I was going to send him this article about Christians being attacked by Orthodox Jews. For years we had arguments about ‘The Israeli Right to Exist’. Mark still knows nothing about comparative religion – or just plain religion. I sent him articles on how orthodox Jews are attacking Christians. Mark declared me a Nazi in a e-mail, and recently toned that down to me “acting odd”. I suggested he and his wife write a book together – then included myself! NO REPLY. I am now convinced the Galls are writing a biography – behind my back – knowing I have been working on my autobiography for years. I have asked Mark Gall to help me. He authored many books. I suspect he showed one of my e-mails to the Corbin brothers, and is why I was un-invited to a wake for their father. Mark wants his book out before mine, wherein I am demonized, and their son Jonny Gall, glorified in the name of the Jewish Nation. This is one of the reasons I declared The World Holy War has begun! Its a WAR OF HOLY WORDS!

Below is a video of me and Classy, making Love not War – with war in the background. I heard a Republican’ Lawmaker Congress needs to get it act together so they can come to the aid if Israel – and not the Ukraine, because it was the most corrupt Nation on earth, and thus it deserved to be invaded. This is why Congress was investigating the Bidens. This is the SHOT heard around the world. Israel has not condemned Putin for invading Ukraine, nor has Saudi Arabia – who was going to make a peace deal.

That deal – is gone with the wind. Everyone is getting what they really want A World Holy War. Consider my last post. Even the Mormons want in on the Holy fight!

I will be making videos on Youtube.

John ‘The Nazarite’

EXTRA! I didn’t realize I included my eulogy to Ed Corbin, and Ed Fadely in this post. I was not invited to Ed’s funeral. Why is Mark Gall pretending to be my friend – when he is not? I demand ans answer! Israel will still be divided three days from now.

OMG! The Dead have been giving me dictation! We are in Prophetic Times!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Pioneer_Cemetery

The cemetery was founded in 1872 by the Spencer Butte Lodge No. 9 of the Independent Order of Odd Fellows. The cemetery is located adjacent to the campus of the University of Oregon but is not affiliated with the college. It is situated across University street from McArthur Court and is behind the Knight Library. In at least three sessions of the Oregon State Legislature, bills were introduced which would have allowed the University of Oregon to condemn the property, remove graves, and build on the land; the last attempt was in January 1963 with the submission of studies presented to the University of Oregon by the Springfield architecture firm of Lutes and Amundson. All of the legislative bills died in committee. The cemetery was added to the National Register of Historic Places in 1997.[1]

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/israeli-police-arrest-five-hostile-gestures-christians-jerusalem-rcna118778?fbclid=IwAR2lKpIl1fJgYocWJvHxxJOv6JG0LfUVl77j0lQjf7lwrVLJnmEPN5e4aV8

https://www.businessinsider.com/us-sent-ukraine-seized-iranian-ammo-gunrunners-tried-smuggle-2023-10?fbclid=IwAR2WQ2Z_RyLVYb2yQrfinVKB2e1Z3_gd52yELvSYNVlzxHwiF1bPVwZnjqk

https://www.facebook.com/v2.3/plugins/video.php?allowfullscreen=true&app_id=249643311490&channel=https%3A%2F%2Fstaticxx.facebook.com%2Fx%2Fconnect%2Fxd_arbiter%2F%3Fversion%3D46%23cb%3Df9fd74a0aa8d68c9c%26domain%3Drosamondpress.com%26is_canvas%3Dfalse%26origin%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Frosamondpress.com%252Ffcb778e37ba300f14%26relation%3Dparent.parent&container_width=640&href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2F100063478955084%2Fvideos%2F338973245329749&locale=en_US&sdk=joey

https://apnews.com/article/armenia-azerbaijan-nagorno-karabakh-weapons-israel-6814437bcd744acc1c4df0409a74406c?fbclid=IwAR1qWSjJP3KksyVZZfPO5KU2vNwikQPC3wCxYzRo9ctU_3pm9u6aGae5VEg

Joy’s Character Assasination

Yahoo/Sent

  • John Ambrose  From:braskewitz@yahoo.com To:Mark Gall Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 11:48 AM

Rosamond’s Stolen Autobiography The Story of Rosamond by Jon Presco Copyright 2017 “Little minds are tamed and subdued by misfortune; but great …

John Ambrose 

From:braskewitz@yahoo.com

To:mail@carmelpinecone.com

Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 11:09 AM

Dear Ms. Papineau;

There was another mysterious drowning at Rocky Point. This area is dangerous no matter if there is a “rogue wave” or not. Enclosed is a more brief account of the mysterious “rogue wave” that allegedly took Rosamond’s life. I never bought the story. I have more evidence it was a fabrication. If the truth had been told would Susan Driscoll had heard it and thus, been more cautious?

Jon Presco

“February 27 Jackie Peterson states that she does not find it to be
a revelation that there may be something that looks like cement
residue in the bottom of her son’s boat; she attributes the residue
to a cement anchor Scott Peterson made, and notes that he has
already stated that he made cement anchors. A Monterey County
Coroner’s Office spokesperson reports that Susan Driscoll’s death
was due to drowning, although the circumstances surrounding her
death are still under investigation.”

http://www.crimenews2000.com/lacipeterson/when/when0302.htm

http://www.colin-forbes.co.uk/locations/cauldron/rocky.shtml

Jon Can you count the rogue waves?

The term “rogue-wave” means one wave, a individual wave, a unexpected
large wave, a creeper-wave. Here is Tom Snyder’s account of the “rogue wave” on page 178 of his biography of my late sister ‘When You Close Your Eyes’. The 911 call was made about 10:15 A.M.

“The water exhausts itself against the slope, and is now rushing back
at the same freight-train speed. Christine is caught in the undertow
of the first wave, as a second wave crashes over her. Tons of water
moving in opposite directions whipsaw Christine before she is sluiced
down a twelve foot drop into the waiting sea. “I had expected Drew to
climb out.” Vicki remembers, “but I was in shock seeing Christine
disappear, and hadn’t noticed Drew was still in the water until I
heard a voice say: Get Drew. Then I rushed to the water to help her.

Vicki intercepts Drew. Pulling her clear by one arm Vicki holds the child against the chilling force of the water and the onslaught of the second wave, then sends Drew scrambling of the slope to safety.

”We were terrified another wave would come at any minute.”

Here is the account of Christine’s jacket that got washed up the ice plants and lay there for a week until Vicki found it while filming a video of this area. It was up high enough that no wave reached it for a week, including the high waves that Vicki speaks of in the Pinecone account where five people were swept away. How long did it take Christine to get that coat off, so that it could be taken ashore in yet another “rogue wave”?

“It is nearly impossible for Vicki to believe that the jacket she has
retrieved from the ice plant is the same one Christine was wearing.
The world become bleary as Vicki tries to grasp the fact that the
ocean must have reached this far up on the slope. Unnoticed, Vicki’s
hands snap and unsnap the fastenings at the waist.”

“It must have been Christine’s time, and perhaps she knew so. I was
there as an afterthought. She and Drew were going to spend the whole
weekend at a guest house. Christine went back and sat down on the
final rock after saying we should go get lunch and rent fishing
poles. She always had nightmares about water, tidal waves, the
ocean’s power, the water taking control. She was facing her
nightmare; she sat back down as if she had conquered those fears. I
didn’t understand why we weren’t leaving. It must have been a
premonition – NOTHING ABOUT THE OCEAN, THAT, DAY WOULD INDICATE WE
WERE IN DANGER.” (Was Drew facing her fears too?)

We weren’t just frolicking on the rocks.” Vicki said. “We were
responsible people, and aware of the water at all times. It was a
full moon weekend with lots of tidal action. A friend told me that
five other people were swept out to sea (from California ‘s north
coast) over the same period. We went to look for shells and tide pools
creatures. Christine was sure the tide was going out. Did she know
what lay ahead?” (I guess it wasn’t Drew’s time.)

Would Christine be concerned about Drew being taken by a huge wave?

“Christine tells Layne that she and others are excited about exploring a small cove to search for any treasures left by the sea. That evening, he sounds a warning not.” If you go down to the ocean,” he tells Christine, “have a care.”

In the morning, under a windless sky, Christine, her daughter Drew
and sister Vicki, make their way down a fence line.”

Vicki was in the Navy and knows about tides and wind. Here is what the Ghost Writer Tom Snyder says about this infamous “rogue wave”.

“Along the precipitous coastline, the Pacific is elusive in its
moods. That was foremost in Donald Lane ‘s mind in voicing his
warning. When near the water’s edge, visitors must follow a
fundamental rule: Never turn your back on the ocean. Yet on this fine
spring morning, that is precisely what Christine Rosamond does. She
sits on a rock with her back to the sea and jams her hands securely
in the leather jacket’s pockets.

“You know,” she says aloud, “if a giant wave came right now, it
could take out to sea and I could drown.” (What about Drew?)

“Traveling thousands of miles across the Pacific, the mountain of
water offshore would appear at first only to be a heavy swell. But
in the moment that its base slams into the rock wall extending beyond
and well above the rocky inlet, an enormous surge of water is driven
upward with a terrible force.” Page 178

Well, not quite. What Snyder is eluding to in his science fiction is
a tidal-wave, or a tsunamis. (Where’s Christine’s motherly concern?)

“Indeed, even tsunamis generated by underwater seismic activity only
create the towering walls of destruction near shore where the water
becomes shallow. On the open sea, a tsunami might pass under a ship
unnoticed.” (Surely Doomed Christine did not want Drew near her.)

We now know it was high tide at 10:33 A.M. and winds up to 25 miles
an hour. One of the rescue people I talked to said he awoke that morning to see whitecaps all the way to the horizon. When you remove this fact, then it is somewhat possible to get near Christine near the water, as she was terrified of the ocean. Here is Shamus Dundon, Vicki’s son. (Is he concerned about the safety of Drew?)

“It was blustery. I only got hot after running around (jogging maybe)
looking for lizards. I doubt she took off the jacket b4 she was taken
by the wave. I doubt she took off the jacket b4 she was taken
by the wave. There’s nothing fishy about 1 wave being right after another. Only one wave is believed to have taken her out. The fact a smaller one set her up for the big one is not suspicious by any means. You’ve been near the ocean….You usually see more than one wave do you not?”

bluster “to blow in violent and noisy gusts, as the wind.”

“This oceanfront location seems a perfect place, and a perfect day
for exploring and tide pooling, with brilliant blue sky. Oddly, for
this peaceful spring morning, there is no wind.” So said Snyder.

“Of course adventures rarely go as planned. The properties main
gate is unexpectedly locked, so Christine goes in search of help.
She finds it in the neighbor, a attorney Donald Layne. Of imposing
size and intelligence, Layne is also blessed with a generous nature.

None of this is lost on 46-year-old Christine. At just over five-foot-
five, she is a perennial fashion plate model and man-pleaser. Even
for this casual outing, she is wearing tailored tan slacks and a
white tunic-style blouse topped by a short jacket in soft, muted-
brown leather – distinctively styled with two snaps at the waist.
The sleeves were turned up, revealing the satin lining and a hint of
a forearm.”

Why wasn’t Christine cold, too? Why would she want to stay down there and fish in those clothes? The following quotes are taken from Stacey Pierrot’s webpage on May 21, 1997. The court-ordered executor has just sold Pierrot aspects of my nieces artistic legacy, and family secrets.

“It was a idyllic picture. At Rocky Point, on the Big Sur coast, on
March 26 1994, the AFTERNOON sun hovered low in the sky. On a outcrop
of tumbled rocks, silhouetted against the CALM, BURNISHED SURFACE of
the ocean, a 46-year-old woman and her 8-year-old-daughter knelt over
a tidal pool. Dipping into the water, the child’s fingers sent tiny
crabs scuttling, sea anemones spitting salt water. She taught me everything and I loved her. Her family was understandably in chaos. I couldn’t just let it all drift away.”

In this e-mail Shamus is denying there was a strong wind.

“I could have described AGAIN for you whatever it was you needed from me. (blustery was a word I got from Winnie the Pooh stories, and the cartoon I saw did not show it to be violent. I never looked it up in
the dictionary) Something since then has set you off…Why you think I’m deserving of your wrath is beyond me. You ask me questions, and I answer them truthfully. Then you call me a pathalogical liar. Then you ask me some more questions.”

“Whoosh! was the sound of the wind in A. A. Milne’s children’s book,Winnie the Pooh and the Blustery Day. This short book written in verse stars all of the original characters: Pooh, Piglet, Eeyore, Tigger, and of course, Christopher Robin. This wonderful children’s novel is about little Piglet being swept up by a big wind and getting stuck near a cliff, deep in the middle of the Hundred-Acre-Wood where all the characters live and play. While poor Piglet is stuck up on that cliff, all of Milne’s other characters come together to devise a scheme to rescue him. This short book is filled with adventure, bits of suspense and lots of stories of friendship. I love this book, along with all of Milne’s writing and would recommend this it to young children and the young at heart.”

“My sister and I both had persistent dreams about tidal waves when we
were kids. She was much more afraid of them than I was, and her
dreams were really nightmares. I was, too, fascinated with big
waves as well. Later in life, when we were apart, we’d often call one
another other to talk about the latest tidal-wave dreams we had.”

Many people knew about these nightmares, and thus would believe Christine’s death was ordained rather then assisted?

Rocky Point Restaurant

“…lavish and modernistic…” “…very impressive…” “…Great waves exploded against huge jagged rocks…” “…Water surged into narrow rocky channels…”

Rocky Point Restaurant is located 10 miles south of Carmel on Highway 1 between Carmel and Big Sur , offering a spectacular view of the sea and shore from all tables.

From the only ocean-front restaurant in Monterey County diners watch for spouting whales and discover sea lions, otters, and pelicans After sunset you can observe the rocks, the cliffs, and the water illuminated by powerful floodlights.

I think the house is visible above the restaurant in the background.

This page: http://www.colin-forbes.co.uk/locations/cauldron/rocky.shtml

I do not have to prove what really happened out there at Rocky Point after proving all the published accounts are lies. Do I have theories as to how Christine got too close to the thing she fears the most in the world, large towering wind-swept waves? Yes.

We know by all the hurricanes we have seen lately that large waves (more then one) are generated by wind.  Tide is another factor, and the moon.  Another factor is mentioned in the Rocky Point restaurant page. “Water surged into narrow rocky channels…” And, yet another in Snyder’s account, “Tons of water moving in opposite directions whipsaw Christine before she is sluiced down a twelve foot drop into the waiting sea.”

Vicki and Drew did two sketches of the place where Christine sat down on that final rock. It sits in the middle of a bowl carved in solid rock by waves surging into a narrow rocky channel, hitting a twelve foot wall (or drop into the sea) and shooting fifty feet into the air like a geyser. When I went there with a friend we saw this geyser at moderate tide, from the house. Surely all those who awoke that blustery morning were treated to quite a spectacle. Surely Drew and Shamus would want to go down and get a close look. It takes about fifteen minutes to get down there. This geyser would have been visible most of the way. There is no way anyone could approach this bowl and be caught unawares. This place is not a beach. At the bottom of the bowl is brownish water that is that color due to the high salt content caused by the evaporating seawater left by the last high tide. No tide pool creatures can live in these pools. Near these pools is the rock Christine allegedly sat on. When I went down to sit on it with my back to the sea, my friend got very nervous and moved about ten feet north to get a better view of the approaching waves, as from this rock you can not see around the bend of the “narrow channel”. (Where was Drew?)

Christine could not have sat on that rock at high tide as she would be under water every time a wave came around that bend, hit that wall, and flew high into the air, filling that bowl. They would have seen this happen as they approached, very cautiously, if Christine was with them, but I don’t think she was. I think Vicki, Shamus, and Drew got too close to that geyser, and Drew went into the water. Perhaps Shamus tried to save her while Vicki ran up to call 911? When Christine ran down to help her daughter, she took off her jacket. She may have jumped into the water. This would account for the jacket being high and dry out of reach of other waves for a week. Adults often drown when rescuing children from the surf. Where was Vicki’s motherly concern?

Why did they lie? Because Christine had borrowed heavily from friends and family as the executor Sydney Morris reported. It was suggested to me Shannon would have been just as financially irresponsible. Friends of Christine approached Vicki, the No.1 Executor, and asked her to change the story, to make Vicki look like a hero, rather then co-responsible for the destruction of the art business with the death of the world famous artist, whose worth might now increase with her tragic, verses stupid, death. Shannon had no allies in the family, but me. We were put in the dark and kept there for the last ten years. If the truth was known, they could not have rested the estate away from the adult heir. I can not see Christine allowing Drew to get close to the water under those TRUE conditions. Drew and Shamus were never questioned. Drew did not attend her mother’s funeral. Why?

John Ambrose 

From:braskewitz@yahoo.com

To:Mark Gall

Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 8:32 PM

I talked to Jeanie tonight. I asked about you and Joy. She said Joy fell a few times, and can not drive. If I can move back to Eugene, I can be her chauffer. You and I can go fishing, again. This is as good as it gets. I was angry at you two in order to stop what was coming. It’s here – in spades! I have contracted 9 people who live, or lived here, today. The window of forgiveness, is open. ‘Love one another”

John 

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.