Senators Thomas Hart Benton of Missouri and Henry Foote of Mississippi argued on April 17, 1850. Benton charged Foote; Foote pulled a pistol. Benton yelled: “Let him fire! Stand out of the way and let the assassin fire!” As this cartoon by Edward W. Clay depicts, spectators fled the Senate galleries. Vice President Fillmore, in his role as president of the Senate, quickly adjourned.
In order to get a leg up over Republican contenders, the real President, lifted his leg – and pissed on the old Abe’s granite trousers! This is THE PISS heard around the world, for it is the start of the Second Civil War. Meanwhile, the other real President heads to South Carolina to try to free the slaves again, because blacks don’t want to vote for him. Why? Do they have their version of events – and the truth?
I declare the Republican Party – DEAD AND EVIL! I am hearing how many people begged Trump to stop THE RIOT. When told his tweet endangered the Publican Vice President, Trump said;
“So what?”
Piss on Pence – and the Constitution – and still millions of Christians have pledged their votes to a Demon who says he wants to be a Dictator? I believe they want him to help Netanyahu build a new temple so the End of the World will come – and so will Jesus! So what Pence – and millions – die in the Tribulation? Lincoln is dragged down and replaced by – King Jesus? Hello Jim Jones!
If Benton were alive, and he read Trump’s devious words, he would challenge him to a debate, because Benton and his cousin, Henry Clay, worked hard on the Compromise of 1850. I suspect Ed Ray and his gaggle of historians – missed this attempt – and removed the Benton name from three building on the campus of Oregon State. I am kin to Joseph Bonaparte?
Yesterday, THE GRAND LIAR tried to remove Lincoln from his party, in order to have twenty million Southern evangelicals feel – GUILT FREE! This is a mass Absolution by Pope Donald, and the Speaker of the House. Congressional Traitor, Murick, titles convicted Insurrectionists, “hostages”. She too got a leg up on old Abe who sent troops against – TRAITORS! What kind of Declaration of War – are you looking for? What if Biden declares himself Dictator – and arrested Trump? You can’t have two Presidents running for the office of the President! Crazy Donald has to admit he lied – to save America! Does he care about us? What if our Democracy – ceases to exist?
“So what!”
John Presco
President: Royal Rosamond Press
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compromise_of_1850
Above is a drawing of my kindred, Senator Thomas Hart Benton, about to get shot
On the third anniversary of the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot, Trump on Saturday called the Civil War, which began in 1861, “fascinating” and “horrible.”
“So many mistakes were made,” Trump said. “See, there was something I think could have been negotiated, to be honest with you. I think you could have negotiated that. All the people died. So many people died.”
“Abraham Lincoln, of course, if he negotiated it, you probably wouldn’t even know who Abraham Lincoln was,” he added.
“By the time the Civil War broke out, there had been literally hundreds of years of negotiations around how, when and where to end slavery, and the southern states that seceded are what triggered the Civil War,” Myrick said. “And it seems like President Trump was implying that some sort of failure of diplomacy on behalf of Abraham Lincoln is what caused the Civil War.”
Benton was related by marriage or blood to a number of 19th-century luminaries. Two of his nephews—Confederate Colonel and posthumous Brigadier General Samuel Benton[20] of Mississippi, and Union Colonel and Brevet Brigadier General Thomas H. Benton Jr. of Iowa[21]—fought on opposite sides during the Civil War. He was a brother-in-law of Senator/Governor James McDowell of Virginia; father-in-law of explorer, Union Major General, and presidential candidate John C. Frémont; and cousin-in-law of Senators Henry Clay, the Benton family children of former King Joseph Bonaparte[22] and James Brown, all of whom married cousins of Benton. His great-nephew was Congressman Maecenas Eason Benton, the father of painter Thomas Hart Benton.
Foote served as a Democratic Senator from 1847 to 1852.[1] He was the chairman of the United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.[2] He played a key role in securing the Compromise of 1850.[1] During Senate debates over the projected compromise resolutions, Thomas Hart Benton refused to support the compromise and became enraged by Foote’s verbal attacks. According to the historian James Coleman, during heated Senate debates over the projected compromise resolutions, Foote drew a pistol on Benton[4] after Benton charged him.[5] Other members wrestled Foote to the floor; they took the gun away and locked it in a drawer. The incident created an uproar that prompted an investigation by a Senate committee.[4]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Hart_Benton_(politician)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compromise_of_1850
New Jessie Scouts Unmask Spies
Posted on April 16, 2021 by Royal Rosamond Press
I have been trying to form The New Jessie Scouts to do battle with the enemy within.
Today, the present Speaker of the House of Representatives, self-identified evangelical and Republican Mike Johnson, supported several different election fraud schemes and continues to advance propagandizing rhetoric, referring to perpetrators of January 6 as “political prisoners.” This rhetoric valorizes those convicted over their roles in January 6, like the “Q-Anon Shaman” Jacob Chansley who is now running for Congress. Speaker Johnson’s propaganda turns Chansley and others into martyrs in the January 6 myth, and allies in Trump’s cause of retribution.
GOP Rep. Elise Stefanik on Sunday echoed Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump as she referred to those sentenced to prison for their roles in the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol as “hostages.”
“I have concerns about the treatment of January 6 hostages. I have concerns, we have a role in Congress of oversight over our treatment of prisoners, and I believe we’re seeing the weaponization of the federal government against not just President Trump, but we’re seeing it against conservatives,” the New York Republican said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”
Responsible Christian Presence
All Americans, both Christian and non-Christian alike, saw the “Jesus Saves” signs and crosses at the Capitol. And yet, in the aftermath of January 6, many Christians in America opted to distance themselves from this obvious Christian influence in various ways. But no sanitizing of January 6 can erase a simple, unavoidable fact: people were praying. They prayed while the spectacle of violence raged. Those prayers and the spectacle must be held together. And it should draw attentive reflection and contrition from Christians, not denial dressed up in calculated, political expediency.
My Letter to Ed Ray
Posted on May 28, 2019 by Royal Rosamond Press
Regarding Trump’s lack of historical knowledge, Holzer said: “It’s not surprising that someone who encouraged insurrection lacks understanding of insurrection. When it occurs it has to be repudiated.”
Here
Corrections & Clarifications: An earlier version of this story misstated the year Abraham Lincoln was sworn into office. A corrected version follows.
WASHINGTON — Former President Donald Trump at a campaign stop in Iowa said America’s Civil War could have been “negotiated,” a comment that drew immediate backlash from civil rights groups and historiaans.
On the third anniversary of the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot, Trump on Saturday called the Civil War, which began in 1861, “fascinating” and “horrible.”
Start the day smarter. Get all the news you need in your inbox each morning.
“So many mistakes were made,” Trump said. “See, there was something I think could have been negotiated, to be honest with you. I think you could have negotiated that. All the people died. So many people died.”
“Abraham Lincoln, of course, if he negotiated it, you probably wouldn’t even know who Abraham Lincoln was,” he added.
Trump’s remarks come just weeks after former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley failed to mention slavery as a cause of the Civil War in a town hall. At a different rally in Iowa, Trump attacked Haley over the response, saying “I’d say slavery is sort of the obvious answer.”
But Trump’s suggestion that the war could have been avoided sparked immediate criticism. Charles V. Taylor Jr., executive director of the Mississippi NAACP, told USA TODAY that “there is no negotiation with slavery.”
Related video: Trump under fire for claiming Civil War could have been avoided in bizarre Iowa speech (Dailymotion)
“Civil rights, human rights should never be negotiable,” Taylor Jr. said. “When Trump says things that are racially charged, and he says things that are polarizing, when he says things that are obviously offensive… what he says is just so egregious, but he is absolutely talking to a specific group of people and alienating another.”
‘These are not just dog whistles’
Svante Myrick, the president of People For the American Way, a progressive advocacy group, told USA TODAY Trump’s comments demonstrate a “glaring ignorance of American history.”
“By the time the Civil War broke out, there had been literally hundreds of years of negotiations around how, when and where to end slavery, and the southern states that seceded are what triggered the Civil War,” Myrick said. “And it seems like President Trump was implying that some sort of failure of diplomacy on behalf of Abraham Lincoln is what caused the Civil War.”
Myrick accused Trump’s comments of being “extremely appealing to Confederate sympathizers and white supremacist folks,” risking dialing up divisions across the country.
LaTosha Brown, co-founder of Black Voters Matter, agreed, saying Trump’s comments appeared aim at downplaying the enslavement of Black people in America’s history.
“We know the history of the South. We know that part of the elements of the South was centered around the institution of slavery and in maintaining that people of color would be in a permanent social status,” said Brown, accusing Trump of speaking “to those that still feel like their only advantage is white supremacy.”
Trump’s rhetoric on the campaign trail has grown more inflammatory as he seeks to clinch the Republican nomination and win back the White House from President Joe Biden. He said last month immigrants are “poisoning the blood of the country,” remarks Biden’s campaign likened to dictator Ado
Trump also drew comparisons to dictators last year when he described his political opponents as “vermin,” reminding many of Hitler and Italy’s Benito Mussolini.
“He’s getting more desperate and because he’s more desperate, I think he’s getting more bold,” said Brown. “He uses lies, he uses fear. He uses this insane concept of white superiority. He uses all of those things as a toolkit in his arsenal.”
Andrea Young, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Georgia, said some of Trump’s comments have pointed to “the worst parts of our history.” She noted that Trump has promoted the false conspiracy theory that former President Barack Obama was born in Kenya, rather than Hawaii.
Taylor Jr. said 2024 will be a “crucial year” as the election will “chart a course in this country.”
“Black voters absolutely know the dangers of what Trump says and because he has been in office, we also know that these are not just dog whistles or just words to excite a particular group of voters,” Taylor Jr. said. “These are things that he believes and we know the consequences of him believing these ridiculous notions have a very negative impact on our democracy.”
Former President Donald Trump addresses the audience during a campaign event Saturday, Jan. 6, 2024, at the DMACC Conference Center in Newton.© Cody Scanlan/The Register / USA TODAY NETWORK
What do historians say about the Civil War?
Historians told USA TODAY it’s absurd to blame Lincoln for not negotiating a preemption of the war.
By the time Lincoln took the oath of office on March 4, 1861, southern states had seceded from the country. Lincoln would never negotiate an agreement that included separation of the states, which he refused to accept or recognize.
Lincoln also made the decision to resupply federal facilities in the southern states, including Fort Sumter in the Charleston, South Carolina, harbor. South Carolina’s decision to attack the federal garrison at Fort Sumter on the early morning of April 12, 1861, little more than a month after Lincoln took office, triggered the military conflict.
David Blight, a Yale University history professor and author of “Race and Reunion: The Civil War in American Memory,” rejected Trump’s comments.
“It is really nothing more than fantasy with dark political aims – it’s history as bad, vicious entertainment,” said Blight, the Pulitzer Prize-winning biographer of abolitionist leader Frederick Douglass.
Historians also questioned how anyone could have negotiated with, essentially, a newly declared nation determined to maintain a slave economy.
Harold Holzer, a Lincoln scholar and the author of a forthcoming book titled “Brought Forth on This Continent: Abraham Lincoln and American Immigration,” said “no historian and no reader of history believes that a compromise could have reversed secession or averted a civil war over- yes – slavery.”
Holzer noted that, before Lincoln took office, “he was willing to guarantee the survival of slavery where it already existed, as long as the Union was restored and the extension of slavery forbidden.”
Regarding Trump’s lack of historical knowledge, Holzer said: “It’s not surprising that someone who encouraged insurrection lacks understanding of insurrection. When it occurs it has to be repudiated.”
The South refused, he added: “The slave states would not return under a Republican president. Six weeks after Lincoln took office Confederate troops opened fire on the federal fort at Charleston.”
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Civil rights groups denounce Donald Trump’s comment that Civil War ‘could have been negotiated’
NN —
GOP Rep. Elise Stefanik on Sunday echoed Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump as she referred to those sentenced to prison for their roles in the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol as “hostages.”
“I have concerns about the treatment of January 6 hostages. I have concerns, we have a role in Congress of oversight over our treatment of prisoners, and I believe we’re seeing the weaponization of the federal government against not just President Trump, but we’re seeing it against conservatives,” the New York Republican said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”
The House Republican conference chairwoman’s comments come one day after the three-year anniversary of the January 6, 2021, riot, when hundreds of individuals stormed the US Capitol to keep Trump in the White House. Over 1,200 Americans have been charged criminally for their alleged actions during the riot, and over half of the more than 890 found guilty of federal crimes have been sentenced to prison time, according to the Justice Department.
A few rioters have claimed in court that they are the victims of politically motivated prosecution because they support Trump. But federal judges, including those appointed by Trump, have rejected these arguments.
Republican former Rep. Liz Cheney blasted Stefanik for calling those imprisoned for their actions during January 6 “hostages,” referring to the term as “disgraceful.”
“That word she used is exactly the word that Donald Trump uses. And that’s why she’s using it. And it’s outrageous, and it’s disgusting,” Cheney said on CBS’ “Face the Nation.” “These are people who were involved in violence against police officers in the assault on the Capitol, and … it’s disgraceful for Donald Trump to be saying what he’s saying.”
Following the Capitol attack, Stefanik made a speech on the House floor condemning political violence but still challenged the certification of Pennsylvania’s votes from the 2020 election.
“I stand by my comments that I made on the House floor. I stood up for election integrity, and I challenged and objected to the certification of the state of Pennsylvania because of the unconstitutional overreach,” Stefanik said Sunday. “So, I absolutely stand by my floor speech, I am proud to support President Trump.”
There is no evidence of voter fraud or unconstitutional overreach in Pennsylvania, or any state, in the 2020 election.
Enter your email to subscribe to the CNN Five Things Newsletter.
Asked whether she would certify the 2024 election, no matter who wins, Stefanik would not commit. “We will see if this is a legal and valid election. What we’re seeing so far is that Democrats are so desperate they’re trying to remove President Trump from the ballot,” she said, referring to efforts in some states to use the 14th Amendment’s “insurrectionist ban” to bar the former president from appearing on ballots.
Stefanik also would not give a direct answer when asked whether she would consider being Trump’s running mate if he were to ask her, but said she’d be honored to work with a potential future Trump administration.
“Of course, I’d be honored to serve in any capacity in a Trump administration. I’m proud to be the first member of Congress to endorse his reelection, I’m proud to be a strong supporter of President Trump, and he’s going to win this November,” Stefanik said.
CNN’s Daniel Dale, Hannah Rabinowitz and Holmes Lybrand contributed to this report.
A demonstrator shoots a chemical irritant at law enforcement in an attempt to enter the U.S. Capitol building during a protest in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Wednesday, Jan. 6, 2021. The U.S. Capitol was placed under lockdown and Vice President Mike Pence left the floor of Congress as hundreds of protesters swarmed past barricades surrounding the building where lawmakers were debating Joe Biden’s victory in the Electoral College.© Eric Lee-Bloomberg/ Getty Images
Former President Trump’s third campaign for the Presidency is promising retribution against domestic enemies, while also holding double digit leads in key primary states. But the two are related. As the nation marks the third anniversary of the January 6 attacks, new research suggests Trump’s increasingly brazen authoritarianism is in step with intensifying Christian nationalism among parts of the American public
Recent survey data of the American public highlights the intensification of key elements associated with Christian nationalism—a political theology that idealizes and advocates for a fusion of a particular expression of Christianity with American civic life. Specifically, studies find Americans who embrace Christian nationalism post-January 6 support the use of political violence in order to “save our country,” support political leaders who are willing to “break some rules if that’s what it takes to set things right,” support for the false claim that the 2020 election was “rigged,” and a decreasing desire to prosecute rioters at the Capitol on January 6th.
These findings highlight the strength of support for Trump’s campaign of retribution with a Christian nationalist audience, and underscores the pressing need for accountable politics and a reckoning for Christian civic presence. Both enable us to resist emerging threats created by egregious myth-making taking place post-J
These post-January 6 myths are not new. They began on January 6, 2021. Like Sen. Josh Hawley, photographed with fist raised towards the mob, or later that evening, Sen. Matt Gaetz arguing baseless conspiracy theories on the House floor claiming that AntiFa was to blame. Though the Presidential election was ultimately certified on January 6, democracy in its aftermath has largely failed to halt the spread and intensification of this ideology.
Today, the present Speaker of the House of Representatives, self-identified evangelical and Republican Mike Johnson, supported several different election fraud schemes and continues to advance propagandizing rhetoric, referring to perpetrators of January 6 as “political prisoners.” This rhetoric valorizes those convicted over their roles in January 6, like the “Q-Anon Shaman” Jacob Chansley who is now running for Congress. Speaker Johnson’s propaganda turns Chansley and others into martyrs in the January 6 myth, and allies in Trump’s cause of retribution.
Similarly, the Speaker’s office plans to release 40,000 hours of security footage of January 6, with the faces of participants blurred out. He defends this decision by appealing to freedom, arguing he is letting the American people decide. But the American people and our politicians are not ignorant of the ways digital algorithms on TikTok or X alter, distort, and amplify conspiracy theory and propaganda—like election fraud claims or, in this case, fragmented clips of January 6. Many of us can point to close family and friends whose conversion to conspiracy theory has fractured previously close relationships.
How can Americans resist these currents of disinformation and retribution being sown and masked by the mythmaking taking place around January 6th? We believe accountable politics and responsible Christian presence are two possible paths forward.
Accountable Politics
A key element will be the continued work of scholars to historically document January 6. Facts and truth must counter propaganda and myth.
We believe accountable politics means beginning with all Americans. Where everyday citizens choose to recognize and resist the spirit of retribution and vengeance, in themselves and others. If there is a crisis of democracy, it concerns all of us. But no common ground is possible without recognizing common humanity.
These ideals make for good speeches, but the legacies of Douglass, Baldwin, and King teach us the worth of great ideals is weighed in the hands of citizens who translate them into responsible and creative action, not without consequences. Part of this responsibility, we think, involves a common, local refusal to hand power to those like Trump, who campaign on retribution, from school boards to the halls of Congress.
We can’t forget accountable politics is material politics. Perhaps nothing could diffuse the fear that drives voters into the arms of a strongman like economic relief. And for all the ways to stabilize democracy—like elevating bipartisan leaders through the power of the vote—we shouldn’t forget that democracy is only as strong as our willingness to promote dialogue that rejects demonization. After all, the cause of retribution only works in a division of “us” versus “them.”
But too often, demonization is just what our politics and our algorithms reward. And creating division like this has often curated power for Christians in America. It’s a “culture war Christianity” buried within the ideology of Christian nationalism, a toxic mixture of moral anxiety with a self-justifying moral authority.
No matter how accountable our politics, we cannot stop the intensity of Christian nationalism by ignoring these “Christian” elements. Democracy can do everything in its power to protect itself from this ideology. But at best, it will always leave the distinctively Christian elements untouched. Here, there remains a crisis to be resolved by those Christians unafraid and free to implicate themselves by publicly admitting the ways Christian beliefs fueled a national tragedy.
The testimony of a Capitol Police Officer before Congress, “It was clear the terrorists perceived themselves to be Christian,” is perhaps best reserved for Christians in America.
Responsible Christian Presence
All Americans, both Christian and non-Christian alike, saw the “Jesus Saves” signs and crosses at the Capitol. And yet, in the aftermath of January 6, many Christians in America opted to distance themselves from this obvious Christian influence in various ways. But no sanitizing of January 6 can erase a simple, unavoidable fact: people were praying. They prayed while the spectacle of violence raged. Those prayers and the spectacle must be held together. And it should draw attentive reflection and contrition from Christians, not denial dressed up in calculated, political expediency.
Only contrition from Christians over January 6 will lead us to resist retribution as a political cause. As practicing Christians, one of us an ethicist and the other a sociologist, we don’t fault our fellow non-Christian Americans who are skeptical of a Christian public presence, who might tend to reject conversations about what Christians can offer American society. We believe such skepticism is often valid. It comes from observing in Christians a political will to dominate, rather than a commitment to cultivate a world where all people can flourish and where the rights of each person to engage with the political system are defended.
The renewal of Christian civic presence in a pluralistic society begins with a reckoning. One where Christians stop confusing the power to crucify with the power of the Crucified One. This power is what David Bentley Hart calls the “anarchy of charity” — the opposite of domination. To our fellow Christians in America, we cannot sanitize or mythologize January 6. These myths do nothing but protect the power of a fast-regrouping Christian civic machine looking to install a certain vision of Christian morality through coercive force. We cannot be a reconciling presence championing the cause of retribution.
But the incentive to forget an event like January 6 always arises from the will to power. For every “remembering” in American history there is also a “forgetting,” for every Fort Sumter, Pearl Harbor, and 9/11, there is the Stono rebellion or Osage murders. The Lost Cause myth sustained the cultural white supremacy of Southern States in the wake of their defeat in the Civil War. It aided in the construction of Jim Crow.
The Christian Nationalist myth of January 6 leads us down similar paths, towards more violence and retribution, in denial of the Jesus some Americans claim to follow. These myths, today, mask the intensifying of Christian Nationalist ideology, threatening our political system, and damaging a civil sphere that we hope can yet become a common ground. Reckoning with and resisting these myths through accountable politics and a more responsible Christian presence are part of the way forward.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/speaker-mike-johnson-still-wont-say-biden-won-2020-election
ZARDOZ and The Anti-Christ
Posted on October 5, 2022 by Royal Rosamond Press
Jacob Chansley during the Capitol riot in Washington, Jan. 6, 2021. Chansley
The Oath Keeper’s trial has begun. A year before the elections I attended a rally put on by The One Percenters. They were to speak after a Gay Pride event. There was – violence! This was a very prophetic AND DRAMATIC event. Religious schisms and strife – have always been dramatic because a Vortex of Righteousness must be built. That the leader of the Oregon Shakespeare Festival established a perimeter into the community, and polices that area – IS ALWAYS THREATENING – especially if there is…
CENSORSHIP
I came armed with Luke’s Light Lazer in a quiver that got the attention of a Percenter armed with a assault rifle. This is…..High Drama! It’s all about Ratings, The Draw, Ticket Sales, Tithing – and Trump know it. Millions of Christians got – BORED SILLY – listening to the same old promises fifty two times a year. THEY WANTED ACTION! This is why they forgive Hershal Walker and the Oath Keepers. They don’t want anything to do with Civil Justice and Civic……REST! They are the Children of Unrest. They grow hungrier every day. They did not wear masks in church. They….died!
Today is the morning of the Day of Atonement. We are in The High Holidays!
Repent!
John ‘The Nazarite’
Oath Keepers Texts Provide Window Into Conspiracy Mind-set – The New York Times (nytimes.com)
Oregon’s Own Antichrist vs. MADA
Posted on January 14, 2021 by Royal Rosamond Press
When I went to Wayne Morse Square dressed as The Antichrist, I did so trying to get my courage back after being threatened by the Alleybellites and Kimites. In looking at the video I took, talking to a Three-Percenter, I wondered why he made no comment about me saying – I am The Antichrist. After the Storm The Dome Day, I realized there’s eight or ten guys (and a woman?) who claim to be the Antichrist – at every event! I thought I was original! My Light Sabre did get some attention.
In the God Gun Liberty video, it appears I might get in a fight with a young man wearing a MADA cap. He got punched in the nose when the T-Mob pushed people around to get to the podium and mic – that the Gay Pride Day folks refused to hand over. A Lesbian socked him in the nose – and drew blood.
It is now being reported Lawmakers helped the T-Mob in Oregon, and at the Dome, that looks like a scene out of Gone With The Wind. As I talk to an armed man, Belle’s old boyfriend (who changed his name to Marla) danced half-naked in the background. The Crazy are legion at Trump rallies. This is what he meant by “wild time”. Consider the source. Trump is not sorry – at all! His office is just another disguise for the real Antichrist – who might start a nuclear war.
Johnny Antichrist Presco
Trump is isolated and angry at aides for failing to defend him as he is impeached again (msn.com)
“With less than seven days remaining in his presidency, Trump’s inner circle is shrinking, offices in his White House are emptying, and the president is lashing out at some of those who remain. He is angry that his allies have not mounted a more forceful defense of his incitement of the mob that stormed the Capitol last week, advisers and associates said.”
Gone With The Wind (1939) Battle of Atlanta Injuries – YouTube
(1) Return of Merlin – Antichrist – YouTube
(1) Praise Be To Zardoz – YouTube
ICE acting director resigns weeks after assuming post (msn.com)
Video Shows Ore. Lawmaker Letting Rioters Inside State Capitol | PEOPLE.com
Ed Ray Speaks To You – His Chosen Ones! | Rosamond Press
(1) Must-See New Video Shows Capitol Riot Was Way Worse Than We Thought | All In | MSNBC – YouTube
“Ed Ray has opened the proverbial Can of Worms. Our lawmakers go hide in Idaho. Here come the Three Percenters! How do they feel about Robert E. Lee and his statues – that are works of art?
Rosamond Press 
Leave a comment