Egregore of the Shroud of Savoy and Rougemomt

Jesus Christ Face Appears on the History Channel - ABC News

Greg 1970 2The Pope who is no more approved of the making of nine replicas of the Shroud of Turin so they may tour the world in what has been called, a New Evangelicism. The Rougemont Templars came to own the Shroud, as did the House of Savoy that produced one King of Spain. Here is Pan’s Labyrinth again.

The Shroud is now an Egregore and thus in theory I capture it and take to Rose Mountain for safe keeping.

What is in a name?

SHROUD – HROS
MUNDI – OF THE WORLD
HROSMUND – ROSAMOND

Angelic Lord of Rougemont

http://en.radiovaticana.va/articolo.asp?c=669017

http://wnep.com/2013/02/24/shroud-of-turin-exhibit/

Catholics believe this is an exact replica of the real Shroud of Turin in Italy.
Pope Benedict the 16th approved nine replicas of the actual shroud, and then individually blessed the cloths.
Each cloth was sent on tours all around the world.
“How many of us can really go to Turin, and that’s the feeling of the holy father, to let everyone see this, what the lord has left behind for us,” said Monsignor Grabowsky.
Many said they are so excited that the pope would do this, and it is a bitter sweet time for some followers now that Pope Benedict the 16th is stepping down.
“John Paul the second, that previous Pope was one of my favorites, Pope Benedict has also been very good, and I’m hoping and praying that the next successor will be just as good,” said Robin Wasatonic Coopersburg.
For the many many people that came out to Shenandoah from all over Pennsylvania, some waiting for over a year. This is something everyone can admire.
“Not just for Catholics, not just for Christians, it’s for all people to appreciate,” said William Jones of Allentown.
“It’s like everyone has been touched in some way. They come with mixed feelings and emotions and when they behold it, they leave a whole different way,” said Monsignor Grabowsky.
The Shroud of Turin exhibit will be on display for the next two weeks at St. Michael’s Church in Shenandoah.

http://www.chaosmatrix.org/library/chaos/texts/egregore.html

http://www.crcsite.org/egregor.htm

During The Trial of the Templars in 1307 Brother Jean Taillefer of Genay gave evidence. He “was received into the order at Mormant, one of the three perceptories under the jurisdiction of the Grand Priory of Champagne at Voulaine. He said at his initiation ‘an idol representing a human face’ was placed on the altar before him. Hughes de Bure, another Burgundian from a daughter house of Voulaine, described how the ‘head’ was taken out of a cupboard, or aumbry, in the chapel, and that it seemed to him to be of gold or silver, and to represent the head of a man with a long beard. Brother Pierre d’Arbley suspected that the ‘idol’ had two faces, and his kinsman Guillaume d’Arbley made the point that the ‘idol’ itself, as distinct from copies, was exhibited at general chapters, implying that it was only shown to senior members of the order on special occasions.
The treasurer of the Paris temple, Jean de Turn, spoke of a painted head in the form of a picture, which he had adored at one of these chapters.

Nearly all the brethren agreed that the head was bearded and had long hair, and the Templars, like the majority of their contemporaries, regarded long hair as effeminate, so the length of the ‘idol’s hair was remarkable for this, if for no other reason.

– Noel Currer-Briggs, The Shroud and the Grail

It is possible that the head idol was intended to represent the severed head of John the Baptist, based on allegations that he was revered by the Order. The Templars took part in the sack of Constantinople during the Fourth Crusade in 1203-4. Robert de Clari described the opulence and numerous relics at the sacred chapel of the Boucoleon Palace, amongst them supposedly the head of John the Baptist. An egregore is a magical entity that is artificially created by the focused thoughts and desires of a medium (analogous in many ways to Tibetan tulpas.) Supposedly a medium or statue could then serve as a tenant for the egregore, nourished by the sexual life-powers of the members.

“The Egregora does exist in the so-called ‘astral plane’ and it is a demon, that is to say, an illusory entity. It is not a true Microcosm, but a gestalt of vitalized shells, a focus for everything that is negative, defeatist, maudlin, bigoted, introverted in human nature – a morass completely hostile to progress and to the spiritual evolution of mankind.

The representation of the egregore as bust recalls the ancient literary tradition of animated statues or Salome, who wanted the head of John the Baptist, probably to master his visionary powers. The classic prototype of such an egregore is Baphomet, the alleged egregore of the Templars, who was (as the Roman Emperor of the Gods) likewise worshipped in the form of a bust. In the secret statutes of the Templars, Baphomet was besought with the introduction to the Qu’ran and dismissed with the 24th chapter of the Book of Sirach.

In 1204, a knight named Robert de Clari who participated in the Fourth Crusade that captured Constantinople, claims the cloth was among the countless relics in the city: “Where there was the Shroud in which our Lord had been wrapped, which every Friday raised itself upright so one could see the figure of our Lord on it. And none knows – neither Greek nor Frank – what became of that shroud when the city was taken.” [27] (The apparent miracle of the cloth raising itself may be accounted for as a mistranslation: the French impersonal passive takes the form of a reflexive verb. Thus the original French could equally well be translated as the cloth was raised upright. De Clari’s matter of fact delivery does not suggest that he witnessed anything out of the ordinary.) However, the historians Madden and Queller describe this part of Robert’s account as a mistake: Robert had actually seen or heard of the sudarium, the handkerchief of Saint Veronica (which also purportedly contained the image of Jesus), and confused it with the grave cloth (sindon).[28] In 1205, the following letter was sent by Theodore Angelos, a nephew of one of three Byzantine Emperors who were deposed during the Fourth Crusade, to Pope Innocent III protesting the attack on the capital. From the document, dated 1 August 1205: “The Venetians partitioned the treasures of gold, silver, and ivory while the French did the same with the relics of the saints and the most sacred of all, the linen in which our Lord Jesus Christ was wrapped after his death and before the resurrection. We know that the sacred objects are preserved by their predators in Venice, in France, and in other places, the sacred linen in Athens.”

Amadeo I (Italian Amedeo, sometimes anglicized as Amadeus) (30 May 1845 – 18 January 1890) was the only King of Spain from the House of Savoy. He was the second son of King Vittorio Emanuele II of Italy and was known for most of his life as the Duke of Aosta, but reigned briefly as King of Spain from 1870 to 1873.
Granted the hereditary title Duke of Aosta in the year of his birth, he founded the Aosta branch of Italy’s royal House of Savoy, which is junior in agnatic descent to the branch descended from King Umberto I that reigned until 1946, but senior to the branch of the Dukes of Genoa

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_of_Aosta

Umberto I or Humbert I (Italian: Umberto Ranieri Carlo Emanuele Giovanni Maria Ferdinando Eugenio di Savoia, English: Humbert Ranier Charles Emmanuel John Mary Ferdinand Eugene of Savoy; 14 March 1844 – 29 July 1900), nicknamed the Good (in Italian il Buono), was the King of Italy from 9 January 1878 until his death.
Umberto’s reign saw Italy attempt colonial expansion into East Africa, successfully gaining Eritrea and Somalia despite being defeated by Abyssinia at the Battle of Adowa in 1886. In 1882, he approved the Triple Alliance with the German Empire and Austria-Hungary.
He was deeply loathed in far-left circles, because of his conservatism and support of the Bava-Beccaris massacre in Milan. He was especially hated by anarchists, who attempted an assassination on him during the first year of his reign. He was killed by another anarchist, Gaetano Bresci, two years after the Bava-Bacharis massacre.

Archduchess Adelaide as queen-consort
She was born at the Royal Palace of Milan to Rainer Joseph of Austria and his wife Elisabeth of Savoy.[2] Named Adelaide, or known as Adele in the family, she held the title of Archduchess of Austria. Her father was the Viceroy of Lombardy-Venetia and was a son of Leopold II, Holy Roman Emperor and Maria Luisa of Spain.[2] Her mother was a member of the House of Savoy and a daughter of the Prince of Carignano, the head of the junior branch of the House of Savoy who ruled the Kingdom of Sardinia. Her younger brother Archduke Rainer Ferdinand later acted as Minister President of Austria. Both of her brothers contracted morganatic marriages

Princess Maria Clotilde of Savoy (2 March 1843 – 25 June 1911) married Napoleon Joseph Bonaparte and had issue.
Umberto I of Italy (14 March 1844 – 29 July 1900) married Princess Margherita of Savoy and had issue.
Amadeo of Spain (30 May 1845 – 18 January 1890) married Maria Vittoria dal Pozzo and later Maria Letizia Bonaparte and had issue.
Prince Oddone of Savoy (11 July 1846 – 22 January 1866) died unmarried.
Princess Maria Pia of Savoy (14 February 1847 – 5 July 1911) married Luís I of Portugal and had issue.
Prince Carlo Alberto of Savoy (2 June 1851 – 22 June 1854) Duke of Chablais, died in infancy.
Prince Vittorio Emanuele of Savoy (6 July 1852) died at birth.
Prince Vittorio Emanuele of Savoy (18 January 1855 – 17 May 1855) Count of Genevois, died in infancy.

The House of Lorraine, the main and now only remaining line known as Habsburg-Lorraine, is one of the most important and was one of the longest-reigning royal houses in the history of Europe.[1] Currently the house is headed by Karl Habsburg-Lothringen, the titular Emperor of Austria, King of Hungary, Croatia, Bohemia, Galicia and Lodomeria, Illyria, as well as the titular King of Jerusalem.[2]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Habsburg-Lorraine

Subject: [DEGRUY] GRUYERE & ROUGEMONT castles switzerland locus of originalsites COLOR PHOTOS www AVAILABLE gruyere castle captured garment BURGUNDYDUKE ROBE exhibit / hugo/fouchere/nodier masonics HOLY SHROUD BLOOD SECRETS/ radiant merovingian synchronicty SR,OTHON de la ROCHE de RAY crusder/templar/priory de sion
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 22:42:20 GMT

+GRUYERE & ROUGEMONT CASTLES+
(located in switzerland)
>are both pictured on the internet
in recent photographs of 2010
>w/ some history providedthe counts of gruyerein current touring prsentations.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
2) the link between gruyere castle and
the castles at chillon & aigle is
+POETIC CHILLON+
(byron’s poetry)
>stressed in recent writings.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
3) the beautiful ceremonial robe of the
+WAR BOOTY+
>duke of burgundy captured in the
early conflicts is exhibited at
+GRUYERES CASTLE+
^^^^^^^^^^^
>this was an important acquisition
considering the size and power
+OF ANCIENT BURGUNDY+
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>(i have seen these robes and they
are large and very impressive)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

4) rougemont castle (switzerland) is also
pictured in many clear color photos
on the internet but remember
+1569+
>this was constructed after
>the gruyere counts lefti understand is a holiday rental.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

+ROUGEMONT CASTLE-FRANCE+
(st. george link to swiss)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>the lords of rougemont were also the
archbishops of besancon which gives
us the perspective of the intense..
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+VICTOR HUGO-ADELE FOUCHER+
+AND CHARLES NODIER+
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>interest in knights templar, freemason
+SHARED W/ NOLA COUSINS+
>priory de sion, holy shroud, history.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+REMEMBER+
1) nodier’s father was mayor of the
town of besancon plus head of
+BESANCON FREEMASONS+
^^^^^^^^^^
2) the famous rougemont family heir..
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+HUBERT de rougemont VILLERSEXEL+
+COUNT de la ROCHE de RAY+
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>married margaret (de vergy) de charney
>who had inherited the holy shroudguillemette de ray ws the daughter of
+OTHON de la ROCHE de RAY+
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+IMPORTER OF THE HOLY SHROUD+
(gave to pons roche de ray, his son)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>which explains why the shroud
first went to de ray castle.
(north of besancon)
^^^^^^^^^^^
+AMAZING SYNCHRONICITY OF OUR+
la roche deray/decharney/vergy/degruy/
>(hugo-foucher-nodiermerovingian blood secretsat the head of their agendawhile distracted with

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Savoy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor_Emmanuel,_Prince_of_Naples

Grand Masterships
King Umberto II, the last king of Italy, did not abdicate his position as fons honorum (or Fount of honour). When he left Italy, he purported to take the hereditary Grand Masterships of the dynastic orders of his royal house with him. These orders were Ordine Supremo della SS. Annunziata (The Supreme Order of the Most Holy Annunciation) and Ordine dei Santi Maurizio e Lazzaro (The Order of Saints Maurice and Lazarus). Umberto II claimed to hold these until his death in 1983.[citation needed]
[edit] Duke of Savoy
On 7 July 2006 Vittorio Emanuele’s kinsman and dynastic rival, Amedeo, 5th Duke of Aosta declared himself to be the head of the House of Savoy and Duke of Savoy, claiming that Vittorio Emanuele had lost his dynastic rights when he married without the permission of King Umberto II in 1971. Amedeo has received the support of the President of the Council of the Senators of the Kingdom Aldo Alessandro Mola and of Vittorio Emanuele’s sister Princess Maria Gabriella of Savoy.[citation needed]
Vittorio Emanuele and his son have applied for judicial intervention to forbid Amedeo from using the title “Duke of Savoy”. An initial hearing was scheduled in the court of Arezzo, with a ruling expected by 6 June 2006.[3]
[edit] Other honours
Monarchical styles of
Vittorio Emanuele, Prince of Naples

Reference style
His Royal Highness
Spoken style
Your Royal Highness
Alternative style
Sir
Vittorio Emanuele is a Bailiff Grand Cross of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta and a Bailiff Grand Cross of Justice of the Constantinian Order of St George.
He also claims to hold several Russian dynastic orders, including the Order of Saint Andrew, Grand Cross of the Order of Saint Alexander Nevsky, the Order of the White Eagle, and the Order of Saint Anne. He is also a Knight of the Order of the Redeemer of Greece, and the Order of the Immaculate Conception of Vila Viçosa. He is the heir to the Savoy claim to the title of “King of Jerusalem”.[citation needed]

Fight with Amedeo (2004)
On 21 May 2004, following a dinner held by King Juan Carlos I of Spain held at the Zarzuela Palace on the eve of the wedding of his son Felipe, Prince of Asturias, Vittorio Emanuele punched his third cousin and arch-rival Amedeo, Duke of Aosta, twice in the face, causing him to fall down the steps.[22][23] Former Queen Anne-Marie of Greece caught Amedeo to prevent him further injuring himself and helped him indoors, staunching his bleeding face until first aid could be administered. Upon learning of the incident the King Juan Carlos, a cousin of both men, reportedly declared that “never again” would an opportunity to abuse his hospitality be afforded to the competing pretenders.[23]

Vittorio Emanuele, Prince of Naples, formerly Crown Prince of Italy (Vittorio Emanuele Alberto Carlo Teodoro Umberto Bonifacio Amedeo Damiano Bernardino Gennaro Maria di Savoia; born 12 February 1937) is the only son of the Umberto II, the last King of Italy. He is commonly known in Italy as Vittorio Emanuele di Savoia. Although the titles and distinctions of the Italian royal family have not been legally recognised in Italy since 1946, he is often styled Prince of Naples out of courtesy, particularly by supporters of the former monarchy.
Vittorio Emanuele also uses the title Duke of Savoy and claims the headship of the House of Savoy. These claims are disputed by supporters of his third cousin, Amedeo, 5th Duke of Aosta. He is also a claimant to the title of King of Jerusalem. He is known to some Italian monarchists as Vittorio Emanuele IV[citation needed]. He has lived for most of his life in exile – following a tightly contested referendum in 1946 in which a majority of the Italian people voted for Italy to become a republic.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor_Emmanuel,_Prince_of_Naples

http://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=GET&db=updike&id=I15363

http://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=GET&db=mdaniels67&id=I4206

http://www.appletree.com/relationships/Hugh_De_Savoy_1

http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/DEGRUY/2010-09/1284072140

[DEGRUY] ROUGEMONT TEMPLAR FAMILY degruy shroud of jesus allies /+ROUGEMONT MONESTARY+ , 1080, near gruyere,founded by count guillaume de gruyere after his return from the 1st CRUSADE
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:45:12 GMT

+R O U G E M O N T+
>the rougemont family website provides
+HOLY SHROUD OF JESUS+
>valuable degruy/devergy information.

>THAT GETS TO THE HEART OF THE
VALENTIN VERLOIN deGRUY(ERE)
(count guillaume, 1080)
>KNIGHTS TEMPLAR ORIENTATION
BASED ON THEIR 1ST CRUSADE
(saint nicholas church)
>HISTORY & CONSTRUCTION OF
THE ROUGEMONT MONESTARY.
(const. near gruyere, 1080)

+GRAIL/SHROUD PASSION+
>in my estimation this placed the
VALENTIN VERLOIN deGRUY
family at magny fouchard and
the french courts, versailles,
amboise etc, in the thick of

+HOLY GRAIL SEARCH+
>the lirey shroud ownership by the
ROUGEMONT/CHARNEY/VERGY
combined family has strong
+degruy/savoy history connection+.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

+HUMBERT de ROUGEMONT+
>de VILLERSEXEL
>COUNT DE LA ROCHE
>LORD OF ST. HIPPOLYTE

>wed the de charney/devirgy heir
+TO THE SACRED SHROUD+
>and removed it from lirey church
TO HIS ST. HIPPOLYTE CHURCH.
at montigny-montfort near near
(REMEMBER OUR DUMONT-
>du MONTIGNY)
>his famous castle at montbard.

+IN BURGUNDY+
(ostensibly to protect it from
the advancing english army.)

>LATER TO SELL IT TO COUNT LOUIS
( degruy relatives )
>deSAVOY FOR TWO CASTLES.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

>the rosicrucian connection of this
history is found in rougemont
+MASONIC SYMBOLS+
>family data and in the ring
owned by david perrin.

+R E ME M B E R+
>the rougemont de la roche ancestor
+OTHON de LA ROCHE+
(latin duke of athens)
>(intermarried w/ de ray family)
>in coordination with degruy neighbor
+COUNT de BRIENE+
(king of jerusalem)

>HAD SENT THE HOLY SHROUD FROM ITS
CONSTANTINOPLE TREASURE TROVE
>1208 a.d.TO HIS FATHER PONS de LA ROCHE
WHO GAVE IT TO ARCHBISHOP
(just n. of champagnole)
+OF BESANCON+

+subsequent history+
1) 1314 A TEMPLAR INQUISITION
(caused much secrecy)
2) 1349, BESENCON CATHEDRAL FIRE
(shroud miraculously survives
is taken up to champagne.)
3) 1356, GEOFFREY de CHARNEY (II)
crusade/templar knight married
to gruyere/virgy ancestor
+JEANNE de VIRGY+
>who was grand niece of
>OTHON de LA ROCHE)
>(typical of shroud mafia blood
>connected family devotees)

>de CHARNEY, FRANCE’S GREATEST
KNIGHT WOULD RAISE THE HOLY
(he secured vatican/pope
construction approval
>SHROUD OVER HIS HEAD IN THE
RELIGOUS CEREMONIES AT
+L I R E Y + C H A P E L+
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>(he was killed protecting the king
at the batle of agincourt and
ironically it was a french king
WHO BURNT GEOFFREY de
(jacques demolay also)
>CHARNEY ( I ) @ THE STAKE.

>after his death, his devirgy widow then
married humbert de rougemont de
villersexel de la roche to secure

+HOLY SHROUD PROTECTION+
(in the castle at montbard
and st. hippolyte chapel.)

Barbara Frale has cited that the Order of Knights Templar were in the possession of a relic showing a red, monochromatic image of a bearded man on linen or cotton.[7] Historical records seem to indicate that a shroud bearing an image of a crucified man existed in the possession of Geoffroy de Charny in the small town of Lirey, France around the years 1353 to 1357.[1] However, the correspondence of this shroud with the shroud in Turin, and its very origin has been debated by scholars and lay authors, with claims of forgery attributed to artists born a century apart.

Full-length image of the Shroud of Turin
In 1389, the image was denounced as a fraud by Bishop Pierre D’Arcis in a letter to the Avignon Antipope Clement VII, mentioning that the image had previously been denounced by his predecessor Henri de Poitiers, who had been concerned that no such image was mentioned in scripture. Bishop D’Arcis continued, “Eventually, after diligent inquiry and examination, he discovered how the said cloth had been cunningly painted, the truth being attested by the artist who had painted it, to wit, that it was a work of human skill and not miraculously wrought or bestowed.” (In German:.[34]) The artist is not named in the letter.[35][36]
The letter of Bishop D’Arcis also mentions Bishop Henri’s attempt to suppress veneration but notes that the cloth was quickly hidden “for 35 years or so”, thus agreeing with the historical details already established above. The letter provides an accurate description of the cloth: “upon which by a clever sleight of hand was depicted the twofold image of one man, that is to say, the back and the front, he falsely declaring and pretending that this was the actual shroud in which our Saviour Jesus Christ was enfolded in the tomb, and upon which the whole likeness of the Saviour had remained thus impressed together with the wounds which He bore.”
Despite the pronouncement of Bishop D’Arcis, Antipope Clement VII (first antipope of the Western Schism) refrained from expressing his opinion on the authenticity of the shroud[37] He prescribed indulgences for pilgrimages to the shroud, so that veneration continued, though the shroud was not permitted to be styled the “True Shroud.”[38]
In 1418, Humbert of Villersexel, Count de la Roche, Lord of Saint-Hippolyte-sur-Doubs, moved the shroud to his castle at Montfort, Doubs, to provide protection against criminal bands, after he married Charny’s granddaughter Margaret. It was later moved to Saint-Hippolyte-sur-Doubs. After Humbert’s death, canons of Lirey fought through the courts to force the widow to return the cloth, but the parliament of Dole and the Court of Besançon left it to the widow, who traveled with the shroud to various expositions, notably in Liège and Geneva.
The widow sold the shroud in exchange for a castle in Varambon, France in 1453. The new owner, Anne of Cyprus, Duchess of Savoy, stored it in the Savoyard capital of Chambéry in the newly built Saint-Chapelle, which Pope Paul II shortly thereafter raised to the dignity of a collegiate church. In 1464, Anne’s husband, Louis, Duke of Savoy agreed to pay an annual fee to the Lirey canons in exchange for their dropping claims of ownership of the cloth. Beginning in 1471, the shroud was moved between many cities of Europe, being housed briefly in Vercelli, Turin, Ivrea, Susa, Chambéry, Avigliana, Rivoli, and Pinerolo. A description of the cloth by two sacristans of the Sainte-Chapelle from around this time noted that it was stored in a reliquary: “enveloped in a red silk drape, and kept in a case covered with crimson velours, decorated with silver-gilt nails, and locked with a golden key.”
In 1543 John Calvin, in his Treatise on Relics, wrote of the Shroud, which was then at Nice, “How is it possible that those sacred historians, who carefully related all the miracles that took place at Christ’s death, should have omitted to mention one so remarkable as the likeness of the body of our Lord remaining on its wrapping sheet?” He also noted that, according to St. John, there was one sheet covering Jesus’s body, and a separate cloth covering his head. He then stated that “either St. John is a liar,” or else anyone who promotes such a shroud is “convicted of falsehood and deceit”.[39

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Shroud_of_Turin

Three years ago I discovered the Templar Chapel of Fontenotte where the Rougemont family of Knights Templar worshipped.

Jon Presco

Copyright 2008

http://www.petit-patrimoine.com/fiche-petit-patrimoine.php?id_pp=21231_3

Dove seal ssed on the Seal of Etienne de Til-Chatel, lord of Pichanges, Preceptor of La Fontenotte. Representation of a dove, facing backwards and grasping an olive branch within its beak.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knights_Templar_Seal

This Templar Order came to own the Templar Seal of Etienne de Til-Chatel.

http://www.ordotempli.org/the_first_preceptor.htm

In this genealogy we see the Lords of Rougemont are also the Lords of
Til-Chatel, and Trichatel which is the same place.

http://tinyurl.com/ycfnto

Allow me to change the names.

“The First Preceptor of La Fontenotte

The fifth son of Guy II of Rougemont and Guillemette de Coublant,
Etienne de Rougemont was lord of Pichanges. In December 1265, having
recalled the donations made to the temple by Aimon IV and Guy II, he
gave to the Templars, with the agreement of his elder brother, Jean,
Lord of Rougemont, the right of pasturage on his lands of Pichanges
and Spoy. He died in 1271 and was buried before the altar in the
chapel of Fontenotte and conferring his Templar rank of Preceptor
(priest-templar).

After the death of Etienne, Jean de Til-Chatel had to confirm in 1274
the rights of the Templars over Fontenotte. In 1278 his younger
brother, Guy, who had been curate of Til-Chatel in 1242 then
archdeacon of Le Tonnerois in the church of Langres, succeeded him at
the head of the lordship of Pichanges.

In May, 1274, Jean de Rougemont, Marshal of Burgundy legally
recorded “for the repose of his soul and that of his elder brother,
Etienne de Rougemont, who lies in the cemetery of the said Temple,
and of the souls of his forebears”, granted to Henri de Dole,
Commander of the House of Fontenotte:”

http://tinyurl.com/ycfnto

I have found a Hughes/Hue de Rougemont who a “grand maître du
Temple”in two accounts, and the maître du Temple of Burgundy in
another.This Hugues appears to be related to Humbert de Villersexel
who wasthe Lord of Rougemont and Til-Chatel. Is this the Hughes that
preceeded Bernard de Tramelay/Dramelay? Did this Hugues come after
Bernard. In the Fromond/Dramelay genealogy we find a line of De La
Roches, and thus the Rougemonts are kin to another Templar Grand
Master, Amaury de La Roche.

“Bernard de Tramelay (died August 16, 1153) was the fourth Grand
Master of the Knights Templar. He was born in the castle of Tramelay
near Saint-Claude in the Jura. According to Du Cange, he succeeded a
certain Hugues as Master of the Temple, although this Hugues is
otherwise unknown. He was elected Grand Master in June of 1151, after
the abdication of Everard des Barres, who had returned to France
following the Second Crusade.et”

“Hugues de Rougemont, grand maître du Temple””and Hugues de
Rougemont, large main of the Temple”

Humbert de Rougemont owned the Shroud of Turin. Humbert is a Hue name
and is kin to at least two Templar Grandmasters. Humbert was also the
Lord of Villersexel. He married the great granddaughter Geoffrey de
Charnay a Templar Grand Master. This is to say this Knights Templar
family, and thus the Knights Templars, owned and protected the Shroud
of Turin that they may have seized at Ascalon along with a great
treasure which would account for the large number of castle owned by
this very large Templar family. Never has such a constellation of
Knights Templars gathered in one place, under one roof as they did
come Sunday in Fontenotte.
Amaury and Othon de La Roche brought Jacque de Molay into the Templar
Order, the last Grand Master. Amaury disappears from history, it
alleged he was in keeping of the Templar Treasure. Did he go to
Holland where the Roesmont live, they members of the Swan Brethren
and Masters of Janskirk church?

“The legend says that it manages to escape and disparaitre
definitively at the same time as the Treasury and the secrecies of
Templiers.”

My search for my ancestor, Sergeant Rougemont, has led me to a
Templar family that was invisible. Sergeant was a Templar rank, a
title for a mayor of the Sungau, and a Seneschal. I have no direct
evident Sergeant Rougemont was kin to these Lords of Rougemont ? as
yet!

“I have three separate pages for Rosamond families we believe are
descended from a Sergeant Rosamond, a Huguenot who left France in
1685 at the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes, and fought in the
Battle of the Boyne in Ireland in 1689. We have not yet been able to
definitively tie these three families together, but each family was
independently aware of the story of Sergeant Rosamond and claimed him
as an ancestor. We are hoping that as research continues we will find
records showing us the relationship between our families.”

http://tinyurl.com/yyo7rc

(Images: Montfort Castle home to Humbert and Margaret de
Charny/Rougemont)”

June 1418: The widowed Margaret de Charny marries Humbert of
Villersexel, Count de la Roche, Lord of St.Hippolyte sur
Doubs.”Humbert de Villersexel is Humbert de Rougemont.

http://tinyurl.com/wfxst

“1208 ? Pons de la Roche presents to Amadeus de Tramelay, Archbishop
of Besançon, the Shroud that his son Othon de la Roche, Latin Duke of
Athens, had sent him from Constantinople.”Aymon 2 de Rougemont was
the Seigneur of Villersexel. He married Guillemette de Ray, the
daughter of Othon 2 de la Roche.Othon 1 de la Roche (-before 1161)
had a son named Pons de la Roche the Seigneur de Ray. He first
married Marguerite Tilchatel who may be a Rougemont who came to own
Til-Chatel. Guillaume, Gui, Humbert4, Gui 2, and Thibaut 6 were
Seigneurs of Til-Chatel. Othon then married Pontia de Rougemont/de
Dramelay the daughter of Thiebaud 2 de Rougemont. They has three
children. Humbert, Thiebaud, and Sibylle de la Roche. This union
makes the Shroud the Rougemont family icon, or relic.Jon
PrescoCopyright 2006

Amaury de La Roche fut grand prieur puis maître de la Maison du
Temple de Paris jusqu’en 1264, puis élu Grand maître de l’ordre du
Temple de 1265 à 1271[1

Amaury of the Rock was large host prior then of the Temple of Paris
until 1264, then elected Grand Master of the order of the Temple of
1265 to 1271[1]

http://gilles.maillet.free.fr/histoire/famille_bourgogne/famille_rouge

mont_faucogney.htm

http://www.covati.fr/Communes/Til-Chatel/patrimoine.htm

http://www.mantin.info/montfleur/histoire/montagna.aspx

“In 1260, Jean de Chalon gives his son ainé Hughes his strongholdsand
castles.””in liaison with Jean de Chalon, count de Bourgogne, Amé,
lord deColigny and of Andelot and Hugues de Rougemont, large main of
theTemple, by its seal the authenticity gave to a famous donation.
Itwas with that which Manassès de Coligny, brother of Amé, did with
theorder of the Temple, while being made there receive knight of
thesuzerainty of Montagna, BroissiaSeries B of the AD Besancon – 467
B – Montagna-the-Templar.Manasses Coligny recognizes, in the presence
of Jean Chalon, AméColigny, Point, prior of Gigny, and Hue de
Rougemont, master of theTemple in Burgundy, having resumed on the
order of the Temple landsMontagna , St. Fontaine and dependencies. An
1227(This charter offers the oldest text of the novel archives Doubs).
Concerned with the bishop of LangLMBO, they drew their origin from
Audon I of Til-Châtel, wire of Garnier count de Troyes attested into
918 by its signature in an act of the duke of Burgundy Richard. This
family, which carried like armorial bearings a key out of stake, also
paid homage to the dukes of Burgundy and held a row raised among the
lords of the duchy and county of Burgundy. Its members followed one
another of wire father until the year 1299 dates to which Isabelle of
Rochefort, girl of Left-handed person of Rochefort lord of Puiset in
Beauce, widow of Guy III of Til-Châtel Gonfalonier of the County of
Burgundy, became injury of Til-Châtel. It remaria with Humbert de
Rougemont about 1306 and Maria her Jeanne daughter whom it had had
with Guy III of Til-Châtel with Thiébaud de Rougemont wire of a first
marriage of her new husband. The seigniory passes then in this family
until the end of the 15° century time to which the last of Rougemont,
not having children yielded the seigniory to Antoine de Baissey
resulting from a family of Montsaugeonnais which immediately paid
homage to the bishop of Langres.”

http://www.crystalinks.com/holygrail.html

http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~rosamondgenealogy/index2.htm

http://genforum.genealogy.com/roseman/messages/186.html

Bernard de Tramelay (died August 16, 1153) was the fourth Grand
Master of the Knights Templar. He was born in the castle of Tramelay
near Saint-Claude in the Jura. According to Du Cange, he succeeded a
certain Hugues as Master of the Temple, although this Hugues is
otherwise unknown. He was elected Grand Master in June of 1151, after
the abdication of Everard des Barres, who had returned to France
following the Second Crusade.
j

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_de_Tremelay

About Royal Rosamond Press

I am an artist, a writer, and a theologian.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Egregore of the Shroud of Savoy and Rougemomt

  1. Reblogged this on rosamondpress and commented:

    Hermman Nitsch has awoken The Egregor if the Holy Shroud that belonged to my ancestors the Lords of Rougemont. The Shroud is the bloodiest relic on earth. It is a witness to bloody crucifixion. I will employ it in my crucifixion. The Reougemont Knights Templar own the Shroud. I doubt Nitsch knows anything about the Templars or religion. Humbert de Villersexel is Humbert de Rougemont.
    http://tinyurl.com/wfxst
    “1208 – Pons de la Roche presents to Amadeus de Tramelay, Archbishop
    of Besançon, the Shroud that his son Othon de la Roche, Latin Duke
    of Athens, had sent him from Constantinople.”
    Aymon 2 de Rougemont was the Seigneur of Villersexel. He married
    Guillemette de Ray, the daughter of Othon 2 de la Roche.
    Othon 1 de la Roche (-before 1161) had a son named Pons de la Roche
    the Seigneur de Ray. He first married Marguerite Tilchatel who may
    be a Rougemont who came to own Til-Chatel. Guillaume, Gui, Humbert4,
    Gui 2, and Thibaut 6 were Seigneurs of Til-Chatel. Othon then
    married Pontia de Rougemont/de Dramelay the daughter of Thiebaud 2
    de Rougemont. They has three children. Humbert, Thiebaud, and
    Sibylle de la Roche. This union makes the Shroud the Rougemont
    family icon, or relic.
    Jon Presco
    Copyright 2006

    https://rosamondpress.com/2013/03/30/templar-holy-shroud-and-fountain/

    The First Preceptor of La Fontenotte
    The fifth son of Guy II of Rougemont and Guillemette de Coublant,
    Etienne de Rougemont was lord of Pichanges. In December 1265, having
    recalled the donations made to the temple by Aimon IV and Guy II, he
    gave to the Templars, with the agreement of his elder brother, Jean,
    Lord of Rougemont, the right of pasturage on his lands of Pichanges
    and Spoy. He died in 1271 and was buried before the altar in the
    chapel of Fontenotte and conferring his Templar rank of Preceptor
    (priest-templar).
    After the death of Etienne, Jean de Til-Chatel had to confirm in 1274
    the rights of the Templars over Fontenotte. In 1278 his younger
    brother, Guy, who had been curate of Til-Chatel in 1242 then
    archdeacon of Le Tonnerois in the church of Langres, succeeded him at
    the head of the lordship of Pichanges.
    In May, 1274, Jean de Rougemont, Marshal of Burgundy legally
    recorded “for the repose of his soul and that of his elder brother,
    Etienne de Rougemont, who lies in the cemetery of the said Temple,
    and of the souls of his forebears”, granted to Henri de Dole,
    Commander of the House of Fontenotte:”
    http://tinyurl.com/ycfnto

    https://rosamondpress.com/2013/03/23/sister-knights-of-saint-george-de-rougemont/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4oxg2v4117o

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.