Where Art Thou?
On this day, May 5, 2026 (Cinco de Mayo) I John Presco – Religiously announce I am a candidate for……The Radical Democrat Party that was founded by my kin, John Fremont, and the Radical Republicans. I reborn this party for the reason the Republican Party is totally corrupted, and has destroyed it’s core identity.
THE GLORY HAS GONE OUT OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!
The primary goal of the Radical Democrat Party was to emancipate slaves. The foundation of the Judaic Religion was…..THHE EMANCIPATION OF SLAVES!
The State of Texas just passed a law that makes it mandatory for the Ten Commandments to be displayed. These Commandments were given to Moses to give to 360, 000 lost souls wandering in the wilderness – AS FREED SLAVES! From here on, Moses and Aaron begin….THE RECONSTRUCTION OF A HOME FOR GOD’S CHOSEN CHILDREN.
The Christian Zionists have employed INVISIBILITY and LIES to take over Fremont’s Republican Party, and inflicted a fake lawsuit in order to give $1.8 billion dollars to the New Religious Confederacy, rendering Neo-Confederate Traitors….
THE FALSE PATRIOTS
To top off this vile UNCLEAN treachery, the War Man renders a list of acceptable religions, which goes against the Firs Amendment. Once again, the dirty red state traitors employ Jesus and the Bible to divide our Democracy, and bid traitors to murder loyal Americans.
The RDP will not honor the Supreme Court that has become an Anti-Mosaic Chriistianized Heresy, that subscribes to Paul, who did away with the Laws of Moses, and replaced them with “The Laws of Christ”.
Never before in the history of Democracy has a candidate run on a Religious Revelation Contest, unless you court Pat Robertson.
This morning I had a vision of Moses coming upon a blooming almond tree, with the rising son behind it. I see him breaking off a BRANCH and bringing it to the multitude below. Becuse the almond tree is the first tree to bare blossom (in February an March) it became th symbol of a New Covenanant. Moses made a place to store this BRANCH….The Holy Ark! It is said there are two sets of the Ten Commandments inside the Ark. This is not true. I saw a vsion of Aaron’s Rod insided the Ark, but, this is no true.
THE MINORAH IS THE BRANCH OF MOSES
Is it not possible the dead branch was taken out of the Ark (once a year) put in a vs of water, and one by one, a flower appear…..like a flame?
More will revealed! This is my first step on the Campaign Trail!
John Presco:
President: The New Racial Democrat Party
The righteousness of the Mosaic law is corroborated in Galatians, as in Romans, by appealing to Jesus’ teaching. Paul’s words in Galatians 5:14 parallel his claim at Romans 13:9-10-all the commandments “are summed up in this word: ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ . . . love is the fulfilling of the law.” This reiterates our Lord’s teaching at Matthew 22:34-40. Paul also calls his readers to “Bear one another’s burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ” (Gal. 6:2). The “law of Christ” refers to Jesus’ teaching, considered as the uniquely authoritative exposition of Moses’ law. It is not a matter of Jesus’ teaching becoming a new law; it is Moses’ law as now interpreted by Jesus. And, crucially, Paul does not say that we are “under” the law of Christ, as if we are still under a law and only its content has changed (nor does he use the word “under” in 1 Cor. 9:21, in spite of most English translations).
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Radical Democratic Party | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Other name | Radical Democracy |
| Founded | May 1864 |
| Dissolved | September 1864 |
| Split from | Republican Party War Democrats[1] |
| Preceded by | Radical faction of the Republican Party |
| Merged into | National Union Party Republican PartyWar Democrats |
| Succeeded by | Radical faction of the Republican Party |
| Newspaper | New Nation |
| Ideology | Abolitionism Unconditional Unionism Hardline Reconstruction Radicalism Pro-civil liberties Pro-political reform |
| Political position | Big tent |
| Politics of the United StatesPolitical partiesElections | |
The Radical Democratic Party, alternately the Radical Democracy,[2] was an abolitionist political party in the United States in 1864.[3] It nominated John C. Frémont in the 1864 United States presidential election with John Cochrane as vice president. Frémont’s candidacy failed to gain momentum, and he withdrew from the race on September 22, 1864 in favor of the eventual winner, the incumbent president and National Union candidate Abraham Lincoln.[4]
History
Cleveland convention
The new party convened in Chapin’s Hall in Cleveland, Ohio on at the end of May 1864, one week before the Republican convention. Different estimates were given on the number of attendees, ranging from 200 to 2,000.[5] Often the number given depended on the political leanings of those making the estimate.[6] As well as Radical Republicans, there were also a number of Democrats who were unhappy with their own party’s perceived lack of dedication to the war against the Confederacy.[7] Noted abolitionist and previous Republican presidential candidate John C. Frémont was nominated for President while the War Democrat John Cochrane was nominated as Vice President. Among the notable figures who attended or supported the convention were Frederick Douglass,[8] Elizabeth Cady Stanton[9] and Parker Pillsbury.[10] Abolitionist Wendell Phillips did not attend in person, but wrote a letter on behalf of the new organization which was read out. In it, he criticized Lincoln’s model of reconstruction, citing the experience of Louisiana following its recapture by Union forces and stated that Lincoln’s model “makes the freedom of the negro a sham, and perpetuates Slavery under a softer name”.[11]
The platform adopted at Cleveland called for the continuation of the war without compromise, a Constitutional amendment banning slavery and authorizing equal rights, confiscation of rebel property, control of post-war reconstruction by Congress and enforcement of the Monroe Doctrine. The platform also called for a one-term Presidency as well as other implicit calls for civil service reform. To appeal to Democrats, the platform adopted emphasized the protection of the rights of free speech, a free press and the writ of habeas corpus as the Democrats had criticized Lincoln on these issues.[12] Historian James M. McPherson has argued that because of the party wishing to appeal to Democrats, it refused to take on specific calls for black suffrage and land grants for freed slaves that it might otherwise have explicitly endorsed.[13]
Campaign
Many of the new party’s supporters did not necessarily want it to stand in the election. Rather, the hope was that the formation of a new party would cause Lincoln not to gain the Republican nomination.[14] Although this did not occur, Frémont maintained over the course of his campaign that he would drop out if Lincoln did likewise, in favor of a candidate whose platform more closely matched the ideals of the Radical Republicans.[15]
Frémont gained the support of a number of prominent abolitionists. However, the majority of Radical Republicans continued to support Lincoln as it was felt that Frémont could not win and that supporting him would split the abolitionist vote in favor of the Democratic candidate George McClellan.[16] Additionally, many were less than enthusiastic about the party platform with its compromises aiming to attract Democrats.[17] Frémont continued these overtures during his campaign.[18] As the campaign failed to gain momentum, many abolitionists urged Frémont to withdraw his nomination. No major newspaper supported Frémont.[19] However, some Democrat-supporting newspapers such as the New York World did talk up Frémont’s credentials in order to disunite Republicans.[20] Confederates as well as Democrats took a close interest in Frémont’s campaign, hoping it could help McClellan win in November.[21]
Withdrawal
Frémont and Cochrane dropped out of the race on September 21, 1864. In a letter to The New York Times, Frémont wrote that it had become increasingly clear that the Democrats could not be trusted on the issues of union or abolition. As such, he did not want to act as a spoiler against Lincoln.[22] At the same time, Frémont remained critical of Lincoln, writing that “his Administration has been politically, militarily and financially, a failure, and that its necessary continuance is a cause of regret for the country”.[23] In another letter to the same paper written one week previously, but published in the same edition, he wrote that the ideas of the Radical Democratic Party would nevertheless be pursued.[24] It has been speculated that Frémont’s withdrawal may have been part of a deal with Lincoln whereby the more conservative Postmaster General Montgomery Blair was removed from his post.[25]
Most Radical Democratic Party supporters went on to support Lincoln in the general election,[26] though there were some exceptions to this, notably Wendell Philips.[27] The party itself was finished, having only formed to run a candidate in the 1864 election.
cc
‘Middle finger’ to Constitution: Pentagon slashes list of recognized religions
- Published: Jun. 05, 2026, 9:32 a.m.
- Add us on Google
By
The Defense Department has removed 180 faiths from its list of recognized religions, according to Fox News.
The change was previously announced by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.
The military previously recognized over 200 faith codes that members of the military could claim affiliation with, Fox said. The new number is 31.
A memo from Undersecretary of Defense Anthony Tata stated the changes will streamline collection of religious preferences and enhance delivery of religious support, according to Military.com, a military news website.
“The new list will provide chaplains with clear, readily available information that will better enable them to anticipate the religious support needs of service members and to provide religious support activities that align with service members’ personal faith and practices,” the memo said.
Hegseth said in March that the previous system was impractical and unusable, according to Fox. He said many of the codes were never used.
He went on to note that the vast majority of military members fit under just six of the faith codes.
The complete list of recognized faiths now includes the following, according to Military.com:
- Agnostic (AN)
- Baha’i faith (BH)
- Buddhism (BU)
- Christian – Assemblies of God (AG)
- Christian – Baptist (BA)
- Christian – Brethren (BR)
- Christian – Catholic (CA)
- Christian – Church of Christ (CC)
- Christian – Church of God (CG)
- Christian – Church of the Nazarene (CN)
- Christian – Episcopal/Anglican (EA)
- Christian – Evangelical (EV)
- Christian – Jehovah’s Witnesses (JW)
- Christian – Lutheran (LU)
- Christian – Methodist (ME)
- Christian – Non Denominational (ND)
- Christian – Orthodox (OX)
- Christian – Other (CO)
- Christian – Pentecostal (PE)
- Christian – Presbyterian (PR)
- Christian – Quaker (QU)
- Christian – Reformed (RE)
- Christian – Scientist (SC)
- Christian – Seventh Day Adventist (SA)
- Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (CJ)
- Hindu (HI)
- Islam (Muslim) (IS)
- Judaism (Jewish) (JU)
- No Religion (NR)
- Other Religions (OR)
- Sikh (SI)
Faith codes eliminated from the recognized list include Atheists, Asatru, Deists, Druids, Eckankar, Heathens, Humanists, Magick, New Age churches, Pagan, Rosicrucianism, Shaman, Spiritualists, Troth, Unitarian Universalists and various Wiccans.
Mikey Weinstein, co-founder of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, told Military.com that the new list is a “middle finger to the United States Constitution’s separation of church and state.”
He said codes like this have existed to perform services that sailors, soldiers, Marines, airmen or guardians want.
“Reducing the number of religious faiths from hundreds down to 31 is another absolute, clear, filthy and disgusting, unconstitutional, immoral and unethical attempt to force only the approved solution, getting closer and closer to Christian nationalism,” Weinstein said.
Rosamond Press 
Leave a comment