Yesterday, on June 6th. D-Day, the Supreme Court DESTROYED our Democracy – and the idea We The People can talke to God – DIRECTLY! Elon Musk is a DEMON! He is not a MESSENGER-ANGEL. He has Xed out God. He has replaced God. He takes human being up to heaven, and brings them down.

I began The Gideon Computer shortly after I heard a interview with Steve Jobs on the radio talking about the Mach Mcintosh Apple – that I just discovered came out January 22, 1984. Theee was talk about what the pesonal computer can do, how it can be used. Being raised Catholic, I pondered The Bite Out of the Apple symbol, which can represent The Original Sin, being, God forbid Adam and Eve to partake of the apple tree. They exhibeted Free Will and own………KNOWLEGE OF GOOD AND EVIL!

I believe I have Thomas Gideon attending Stanford where he learns how to use the computer system.At a loss what do with with THE SYSTEM he feeds it all the PHONEBOOKS in America. When he informs important people in his slocial sphere about – WHAT HE DID – thei smiles turned upside down.

“Am I……in your computer?”

Gideon saw everything had something to hide and they owned……A CODE OF GUILT, that secretly ran their lives. These people wnated to be sure they were on Gideons GOOD SIDE, so they offered him

SOMETHING

I just Googled INDULGENCE. An hour ago, I realized I invented faceBOOK….PHASEBOOK

PHONEBOOK……HASBOOK…..OF NAMES

Yesterday the Suprme Court allowed Trump and Musk to access our Social Securit Files, and

TAKE NAMES

They OWN……our names. I thought only God can own our names – and Santa Clause! Trump is doing SANTA. Musk is doing……THE ANGEL OF JUDGEMENT DAY…which was

YESTERDAY

I made this video this morning. Welcome to THE TOWER OF BABEL and….PERGATORY!

When POTUS threatened not to pay Elon’s SIN TITHE, he RATTED HIM OUT with secret Epstein Information. To keep his money away from his accusers, Epstein created a TRUST and NAMED HEIRS to his good fortune. We the Wee People are now in the Roman Coliseum, huddle together as the wealthy Slave Owners, release all kinds of HUNGRY BEASTS….on US. We are……JUST US! We have been rendered….POWERLESS!

The Macintosh was introduced by a television commercial titled “1984” during Super Bowl XVIII on January 22, 1984, directed by Ridley Scott. Sales were strong at its initial release on January 24, 1984, at $2,495 (equivalent to $7,600 in 2024), and reached 70,000 units on May 3, 1984.

In Roman Catholic theology, an indulgence is a remission of the temporal punishment due to sins after their guilt has been forgiven. It’s essentially a reduction or cancellation of the consequences of sins, especially those related to purgatory, through the action of the Church. 

In the teaching of the Catholic Church, an indulgence (Latin: indulgentia, from indulgeo, ‘permit’) is “a way to reduce the amount of punishment one has to undergo for (forgiven) sins”.^[1] The Catechism of the Catholic Church describes an indulgence as “a remission before God of the temporal punishment due to sins whose guilt has already been forgiven, which the faithful Christian who is duly disposed gains under certain prescribed conditions…”^[3]

The recipient of an indulgence must perform an action to receive it. This is most often the saying (once, or many times) of a specified prayer, but may also include a pilgrimage, the visiting of a particular place (such as a shrine, church, or cemetery), or the performance of specific good works.^[4]

Gideon Computer Podcast

Supreme Court allows DOGE to access Social Security data

The dispute concerns efforts by the Department of Government Efficiency, largely led by Elon Musk, to access sensitive data, including Social Security numbers.

Elon Musk listens as President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office on Feb. 11, 2025.Jim Watson / AFP – Getty Images file

June 6, 2025, 1:42 PM PDT / Updated June 6, 2025, 4:49 PM PDT

By Lawrence Hurley and Gary Grumbach

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday allowed members of the Trump administration’s Department of Government Efficiency to access Social Security Administration data.

The conservative-majority court, with its three liberal justices objecting, granted an emergency application filed by the Trump administration asking the justices to lift an injunction issued by a federal judge in Maryland.

ADVERTISING

The unsigned order said that members of the DOGE team assigned to the Social Security Administration should have “access to the agency records in question in order for those members to do their work.”

The lawsuit challenging DOGE’s actions was filed by progressive group Democracy Forward on behalf of two unions — the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, and the American Federation of Teachers — as well as the Alliance for Retired Americans.

“This is a sad day for our democracy and a scary day for millions of people,” the groups said in a statement. “This ruling will enable President Trump and DOGE’s affiliates to steal Americans’ private and personal data.”

The White House praised the ruling.

“The Supreme Court allowing the Trump Administration to carry out commonsense efforts to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse and modernize government information systems is a huge victory for the rule of law,” White House spokesperson Liz Huston said in a statement.

Follow live politics coverage here

Liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote a dissenting opinion questioning the need for the court to intervene on an emergency basis.

“In essence, the ‘urgency’ underlying the government’s stay application is the mere fact that it cannot be bothered to wait for the litigation process to play out before proceeding as it wishes,” she added.

DOGE, set up by billionaire Elon Musk before his falling out with President Donald Trump, says it wants to modernize systems and detect waste and fraud at the agency. The data it seeks includes Social Security numbers, medical records, and tax and banking information.

0 seconds of 11 minutes, 18 secondsVolume 74%

Trump-Musk feud escalates as Congress weighs sweeping Trump agenda bill

11:18

“These teams have a business need to access the data at their assigned agency and subject the government’s records to much-needed scrutiny,” Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote in court papers.

The lawsuit alleged that allowing broader access to the personal information would violate a federal law called the Privacy Act as well as the Administrative Procedure Act.