“I have come for sinners”

Posted on December 3, 2017 by Royal Rosamond Press

 ^“To this they replied, “You were steeped in sin at birth; how dare you lecture us!” And they threw him out.”

This is the lesson that goes with my acceptance speech as the divinely chosen King of Jerusalem.

Last night I read Mathew 19 – and was plunged into more darkness! Why is Jesus giving children lessons on holy folks castrating themselves to avoid being – sex sinners! It says the children were brought to Jesus after this part of The Sex Lesson – that includes lessons on marriage! I suspect the followers of Paul wanted the original lesson of Jesus, altered, changed, cut-out – and Paul’s lessons – inserted! I thought Jesus was done being LEGALISTIC? Was this before he said to Peter

“Get behind me Satan!”

³ The Pharisees also came unto him, tempting him, and saying unto him, Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause?

What is the temptation – to get Jesus to resort to the Laws of Moses to arrive at a God-sanctioned Verdict? Jesus is extremely Legalistic. If you argue with God’s Attorneys, you are being Lawful!

Duh!

When I could not find the book I was looking for in the University Library, I became very forlorn, for I realized I WOULD NOT BE BELIEVED, and that would make me a Christ Figure – even a real candidate for the real Messiah for – the Real Jews! The Jews that legally harass Jesus – are fakes! They are religious props. I knew I was up against the Greatest Religious Façade of All Time, being, many learned Jews read the New Testament and saw what I see – and concluded Jesus is – FAKE!

However, did they know what I discovered, that before Jesus was born the Sanhedrin made a law that read, any child born with a defect, was pre-marked a sinner in their mother’s womb, and thus no rabbi need minister to them?

Jews are being threatened at Cornell. Ron DeSantis has OUTLAWED books that depict Black People – AS VICTIMS! Jewish Leaders are appearing on T.V. declaring Israel has the right to bomb and kill children – because they are Victims of Anti-Semitism! A nine year old Palestinian girl said she is being deprived of her right to learn. There is a call for a PAUSE in the killing. What I call for, as the King of Jerusalem, is…….and admittance by both sides, they took part in The Dumbest Day – and cease! Stop sinning. Leave the children – at peace! Make peace for the sake of the children!

John ACKJ ‘Call me Jack’

But he said unto them, All men cannot receive this saying, save they to whom it is given.

¹² For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother’s womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven’s sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.

¹³ Then were there brought unto him little children, that he should put his hands on them, and pray: and the disciples rebuked them.

Council of Nablus

The Council of Nablus was a council of ecclesiastic and secular lords in the crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem, held on January 16, 1120.

History[edit]

The council was convened at Nablus by Warmund, Patriarch of Jerusalem, and King Baldwin II of Jerusalem. It established twenty-five canons dealing with both religious and secular affairs. It was not quite a church council, but not quite a meeting of the royal court; according to Hans Mayer, due to the religious nature of many of the canons, it can be considered both a parlement and an ecclesiastical synod. The resulting agreement between the patriarch and the king was a concordat, similar to the Concordat of Worms two years later.^[1]

The council established the first written laws for the kingdom. It was probably also where Hugues de Payens obtained permission from King Baldwin II of Jerusalem and Warmund, Patriarch of Jerusalem to found the Knights Templar.^[2] [3]

The council was not mentioned in the chronicle of Fulcher of Chartres, who served in the retinue of Baldwin II and must have been present. This is probably because the nature of the canons, dealing as they do with the crimes and sins of the Latin population, contradicted Fulcher’s portrayal of the Kingdom as a Christian utopia. William of Tyre, writing about sixty years later, included a detailed account of the proceedings, but neglected to record any of the canons themselves, which he felt were well-known and could be found in any local church; however, he also probably wanted to avoid the implication that the early Kingdom was not as heroic as his generation remembered it.^[4]

“I have come for sinners”

Matthew 19King James Version

19 And it came to pass, that when Jesus had finished these sayings, he departed from Galilee, and came into the coasts of Judaea beyond Jordan;

² And great multitudes followed him; and he healed them there.

³ The Pharisees also came unto him, tempting him, and saying unto him, Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause?

⁴ And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female,

⁵ And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?

⁶ Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.

⁷ They say unto him, Why did Moses then command to give a writing of divorcement, and to put her away?

⁸ He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so.

⁹ And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery.

¹⁰ His disciples say unto him, If the case of the man be so with his wife, it is not good to marry.

¹¹ But he said unto them, All men cannot receive this saying, save they to whom it is given.

¹² For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother’s womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven’s sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.

¹³ Then were there brought unto him little children, that he should put his hands on them, and pray: and the disciples rebuked them.

¹⁴ But Jesus said, Suffer little children, and forbid them not, to come unto me: for of such is the kingdom of heaven.

¹⁵ And he laid his hands on them, and departed thence.

¹⁶ And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life?

¹⁷ And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.

¹⁸ He saith unto him, Which? Jesus said, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness,

¹⁹ Honour thy father and thy mother: and, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.

²⁰ The young man saith unto him, All these things have I kept from my youth up: what lack I yet?

²¹ Jesus said unto him, If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me.

²² But when the young man heard that saying, he went away sorrowful: for he had great possessions.

²³ Then said Jesus unto his disciples, Verily I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven.

²⁴ And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.

²⁵ When his disciples heard it, they were exceedingly amazed, saying, Who then can be saved?

²⁶ But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.

²⁷ Then answered Peter and said unto him, Behold, we have forsaken all, and followed thee; what shall we have therefore?

²⁸ And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed me, in the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.

²⁹ And every one that hath forsaken houses, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my name’s sake, shall receive an hundredfold, and shall inherit everlasting life.

³⁰ But many that are first shall be last; and the last shall be first.

Marriage, Masturbation, and Doomsday

Posted on February 21, 2012 by Royal Rosamond Press

Shatan Paul mentions a “present crisis” in regards to marriage and ones sex drive. What is the nature of this crisis?

25 Now about virgins: I have no command from the Lord, but I give a judgment as one who by the Lord’s mercy is trustworthy. 26 Because of the PRESENT CRISIS, I think that it is good for a man to remain as he is.

Paul says “time is short”.

“For this world in its present form is passing away.”

John the Apostle authored Revelations. Is Paul aware of the coming Terrible Day of our Lord – a doomsday that will transform the world? Yes! He is preparing the early Christians for that day by warning them not to spill their seed outside a woman’s uterus, or males will lose a part of their soul – and thus not enter the New Heaven and Earth when it arrives. It never arrived! Thus – ENTER ANOTHER CRISIS FOR THE EARLY CHURCH!

How was this crisis solved by the Christian Apologists who saw their flock walk away? They grabbed them by the scruff of their neck and jammed their faces down in their crotch, and cried – FOR SHAME!

29 What I mean, brothers and sisters, is that the time is short. From now on those who have wives should live as if they do not; 30 those who mourn, as if they did not; those who are happy, as if they were not; those who buy something, as if it were not theirs to keep; 31 those who use the things of the world, as if not engrossed in them. For this world in its present form is passing away.

Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control. 6 I say this as a concession, not as a command. 7 I wish that all of you were as I am. But each of you has your own gift from God; one has this gift, another has that.”

Paul was a Jew who subscribed to the myths about Lilith who took the sperm that males ejaculated outside a woman, and bred an evil race. Paul castrated himself lest he masturbate, and not be admitted to the new kingdom. The crisis may have been the destrction of the temple in 70 A.D. thus the Apostles of Jesus in Jerusalem were in a real crisis because John’s Revelations are centered around the Aaronoid Priesthood of which he belonged. Judgement Day never came, and thus the Sons and Daughters of Aaron never came to rule in the temple – again!

This is why he fell out of favor, and Paul’s Lilith Cult came to the forefront, because it was now a tool to SHAME & TERRORIZE believers and non-believers into submission. Enter, the Billy Graham Crusade – the next Hitler who said this to Himmler as his troops marched into Paris;

“If the Jews did not exist, we would have had to invent them.”

Paul and his Catholic church created a faux crisis over sex, and thus there exist a never ending crisis over our sexual urges that is being laid in the lap of the President of the United States, who Christians are turning into our national crisis, now that the Crusades are ending in Iraq and Afghanistan – and the Evil Empire is a have for greedy Capitialists.

Enough! Jesus and God hate this phony sex crisis cult – and want it to end – wihout anyone going to any cross!

Knock it off!

http://www.pleasureactivism.org/articles/kabbalah_and_sex_part_2.html

Jon the Nazarite

Waving Their Dirty Penis In Our Face

Posted on December 28, 2011 by Royal Rosamond Press

The religions that sprang from the Seed of Abraham are SHAME-BASED religions. Human genitalia is often used to shame God’s Children into submission. God is sick of this evil game, and wants it un-masked – EXPOSED!

Psychologist who study sexual behavior conclude sex is an agreement. The women who have been taken hostage by orthodox extremists have agreed that their sexual identity is dirty and unclean and must be covered up and shamed in public. God has bid me to lift this veil of evil tyranny and expose the HUGE DIRTY ERECTIONS of SELF-RIGHTEUOS MEN – that are right there in our faces!

Saint Paul, a devout Jew, suggested his followers castrate themselves like he had done lest they also be tempted to put their penis in a woman. Paul was terrified of Lilith, as were most Jews. Paul invents Christian rules and laws in order to deal with Lilith and disappear the truth that Christian Saints were sexual beings who had unwanted erections that destroyed the holy image they wanted to own of themselves. How easy it is to blame women for these erections, there no end to the demonization of women – and little girls!
To throw excrement on girls – is the last straw!

Below is an article on how Paul Weyrich worked hard to demonize abortion as a way to create a political voting block that would attack the penises and vaginas of liberals, while at the same time forgive Republican women who sought and received and abortions. Once again THEIR HUGE UGLY ERRECT PENIS is waved in our face so we normal folk can be rendered impotent in every conceivable way!

Jon the Nazarite

Today is the feast of the Circumcision,” he went on somewhat solemnly, “and it reminds us that we must cut off the old man!” Well, the whole audience–males only, of course–winced and instinctively covered our vital parts.

Castration as part of religious practice, and eunuchs occupying religious roles have been established prior to classical antiquity. Archaeological finds at Çatalhöyük in Anatolia indicate worship of a ‘Magna Mater’ figure, a forerunner of the Cybele goddess found in later Anatolia and other parts of the near East.[39] Later Roman followers of Cybele, were called Galli, who practiced ritual self-castration, known as sanguinaria.[39]

The practice of religious castration continued into the Christian era, with members of the early church castrating themselves for religious purposes,[40] although the extent and even the existence of this practice among Christians is subject to debate.[41] The early theologian Origen found scriptural justification for the practice in Matthew 19:12,[42] where Jesus says, “For there are eunuchs who have been so from birth, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by others, and there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. Let anyone accept this who can.” (NRSV)
Tertullian, a 2nd century Church Father, described Jesus himself and Paul of Tarsus as spadones, which is translated as “eunuchs” in some contexts.[43] Quoting from the cited book:[43] “…Tertullian takes ‘spado’ to mean virgin…”. The meaning of spado in late antiquity can be interpreted as a metaphor for celibacy, however Tertullian’s specifically refers to St. Paul as being castrated.[43]

;
The English word eunuch is from the Greek eune (“bed”) and ekhein (“to keep”), effectively “bed keeper”.
Eunuchs would probably be servants or slaves who, because of their function, had been castrated, usually in order to make them reliable servants of a royal court where physical access to the ruler could wield great influence. Seemingly lowly domestic functions—such as making the ruler’s bed, bathing him, cutting his hair, carrying him in his litter, or even relaying messages—could in theory give a eunuch “the ruler’s ear” and impart de facto power on the formally humble but trusted servant. Similar instances are reflected in the humble origins and etymology of many high offices (e.g., chancellor originally denoted a servant guarding the entrance to an official’s study). Eunuchs supposedly did not generally have loyalties to the military, the aristocracy, nor to a family of their own (having neither offspring nor in-laws, at the very least), and were thus seen as more trustworthy and less interested in establishing a private ‘dynasty’. Because their condition usually lowered their social status, they could also be easily replaced or killed without repercussion. In cultures that had both harems and eunuchs, eunuchs were sometimes used as harem servants (compare the female odalisque) or seraglio guards.[citation needed]

The Jews regarded Lilith as evil. According to Jewish folklore, Lilith was forced by three angels to swear she would not harm mothers and children that wore amulets having the names of those three angels (Sanvi, Sansanvi, and Semangelaf).[3]
In Jewish folklore, from the 8th–10th centuries Alphabet of Ben Sira onwards, Lilith becomes Adam’s first wife, who was created at the same time and from the same earth as Adam. This contrasts with Eve, who was created from one of Adam’s ribs. The legend was greatly developed during the Middle Ages, in the tradition of Aggadic midrashim, the Zohar and Jewish mysticism.[4] In the 13th Century writings of Rabbi Isaac ben Jacob ha-Cohen, for example, Lilith left Adam after she refused to become subservient to him and then would not return to the Garden of Eden after she mated with archangel Samael.[5] The resulting Lilith legend is still commonly used as source material in modern Western culture, literature, occultism, fantasy, and horror.

The Myth of Lilith

According to Jewish folklore, Lilith was the first wife of Adam. She was banished from the Garden of Eden when she refused to make herself subservient to Adam (specifically, she refused to get into the missionary position with him during sex). When she was cast out, she was made into a demon figure, and Adam was given a second wife, Eve, who was fashioned from his rib to ensure her obedience to her man. The following is an excerpt from a Jewish folktale that describes some of the evils attributed to Lilith:
“The wife brought the mirror and all of the fine furnishings in the cellar to her own home and proudly displayed it. She hung the mirror in the room of their daughter, who was a dark-haired coquette. The girl glanced at herself in the mirror all the time, and in this way she was drawn into Lilith’s web…. For that mirror had hung in the the den of demons, and a daughter of Lilith had made her home there. And when the mirror was taken from the haunted house, the demoness came with it. For every mirror is a gateway to the Other World and leads directly to Lilith’s cave. That is the cave Lilith went to when she abandoned Adam and the Garden of Eden for all time, the cave where she sported with her demon lovers. From these unions multitudes of demons were born, who flocked from that cave and infiltrated the world. And when they want to return, they simply enter the nearest mirror. That is why it is said that Lilith makes her home in every mirror…
“Now the daughter of Lilith who made her home in that mirror watched every movement of the girl who posed before it. She bided her time and one day she slipped out of the mirror and took possession of the girl, entering through her eyes. In this way she took control of her, stirring her desire at will…. So it happened that this young girl, driven by the evil wishes of Lilith’s daughter, ran around with young men who lived in the same neighborhood.”
From “Lilith’s Cave,” Lilith’s Cave: Jewish tales of the supernatural, edited by Howard Schwartz (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1988)
Other folktales describe of how Lilith captured Jewish babies in the night and ate them, and how she led young girls and young husbands astray. Although Lilith was demonized by early Jewish culture as a symbol of promiscuity and disobedience, many modern Jewish feminists see Lilith as a positive figure, a model of woman as equal to man in the creation story. For further reference, please check out the pages I have listed below, or read the introduction to the collection of stories in Lilith’s Cave (see above).
Other Sources on Lilith:

In the course of one of the sessions, Weyrich tried to make a point to his Religious Right brethren (no women attended the conference, as I recall). Let’s remember, he said animatedly, that the Religious Right did not come together in response to the Roe decision. No, Weyrich insisted, what got us going as a political movement was the attempt on the part of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to rescind the tax-exempt status of Bob Jones University because of its racially discriminatory policies.
Bob Jones University was one target of a broader attempt by the federal government to enforce the provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Several agencies, including the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, had sought to penalize schools for failure to abide by antisegregation provisions. A court case in 1972, Green v. Connally, produced a ruling that any institution that practiced segregation was not, by definition, a charitable institution and, therefore, no longer qualified for tax-exempt standing.
The IRS sought to revoke the tax-exempt status of Bob Jones University in 1975 because the school’s regulations forbade interracial dating; African Americans, in fact, had been denied admission altogether until 1971, and it took another four years before unmarried African Americans were allowed to enroll. The university filed suit to retain its tax-exempt status, although that suit would not reach the Supreme Court until 1983 (at which time, the Reagan administration argued in favor of Bob Jones University).
Initially, I found Weyrich’s admission jarring. He declared, in effect, that the origins of the Religious Right lay in Green v. Connally rather than Roe v. Wade. I quickly concluded, however, that his story made a great deal of sense. When I was growing up within the evangelical subculture, there was an unmistakably defensive cast to evangelicalism. I recall many presidents of colleges or Bible institutes coming through our churches to recruit students and to raise money. One of their recurrent themes was,We don’t accept federal money, so the government can’t tell us how to run our shop—whom to hire or fire or what kind of rules to live by. The IRS attempt to deny tax-exempt status to segregated private schools, then, represented an assault on the evangelical subculture, something that raised an alarm among many evangelical leaders, who mobilized against it.
For his part, Weyrich saw the evangelical discontent over the Bob Jones case as the opening he was looking for to start a new conservative movement using evangelicals as foot soldiers. Although both the Green decision of 1972 and the IRS action against Bob Jones University in 1975 predated Jimmy Carter’s presidency, Weyrich succeeded in blaming Carter for efforts to revoke the taxexempt status of segregated Christian schools. He recruited James Dobson and Jerry Falwell to the cause, the latter of whom complained, “In some states it’s easier to open a massage parlor than to open a Christian school.”
Weyrich, whose conservative activism dates at least as far back as the Barry Goldwater campaign in 1964, had been trying for years to energize evangelical voters over school prayer, abortion, or the proposed equal rights amendment to the Constitution. “I was
trying to get those people interested in those issues and I utterly failed,” he recalled in an interview in the early 1990s. “What changed their mind was Jimmy Carter’s intervention against the Christian schools, trying to deny them tax-exempt status on the basis of so-called de facto segregation.”
During the meeting in Washington, D.C., Weyrich went on to characterize the leaders of the Religious Right as reluctant to take up the abortion cause even close to a decade after the Roe ruling. “I had discussions with all the leading lights of the movement in the late 1970s and early 1980s, post–Roe v. Wade,” he said, “and they were all arguing that that decision was one more reason why Christians had to isolate themselves from the rest of the world.”
“What caused the movement to surface,” Weyrich reiterated,”was the federal government’s moves against Christian schools.” The IRS threat against segregated schools, he said, “enraged the Christian community.” That, not abortion, according to Weyrich, was what galvanized politically conservative evangelicals into the Religious Right and goaded them into action. “It was not the other things,” he said.
Ed Dobson, Falwell’s erstwhile associate, corroborated Weyrich’s account during the ensuing discussion. “The Religious New Right did not start because of a concern about abortion,” Dobson said. “I sat in the non-smoke-filled back room with the Moral Majority, and I frankly do not remember abortion ever being mentioned as a reason why we ought to do something.”

God Didn’t Want His Son to Be Messiah?

Posted on October 25, 2023 by Royal Rosamond Press

“Jesus had just revealed to His disciples for the first time the plan: He was to go to Jerusalem to suffer, die, and be raised to life (Matthew 16:21; Mark 8:31). Contrary to their expectations of Him, Jesus explained that He had not come to establish an earthly Messianic kingdom at that time. The disciples were not prepared for this new revelation of the Messiah’s purpose.”

Several days before October 7th. O was wrestling with Jesus telling Peter;

“Get behind me -Satan!”

Until I read this, I believed Jesus credentials as the Messiah was being questioned by leaned Jews and Men of The Law – which I could not buy – because it was not against The Law to be a candidate for Messiah. Christian Scholars claim Jesus had to die because he said he was The Son of God. Well, there is Law against this either. This Apologist claims Peter unwittingly was going against “God’s Plan’ by subscribing to some Jewish Laws – that were God-given! Huh? Millions of Christians believe Jesus – is God! Millions of Evangelical claim Jesus – did not come for the Jews – who will perish n the Tribulation because they did not subscribe to – GOD’S PLAN, which was kept a secret at the beginning of Jesus’ ministry. Why? Why didn’t Jesus let his adversaries know God wanted him dead, so they can ask, why, then argue about it. What I suspect is the Follower of Saul-Paul altered the original teaching of Jesus to suit their belief in….The Resuscitation!

With the Jewish War against Gaza, there should be many questions from learned Christian scholars about the involvement of Christian Nations. I am – The First Argument! This statement is the crux of my argument, that Saul-Paul, and members of his cult,, stole the God and Religion of the Jews – and transferred it over to Gentiles, who today want the Tribulation to happen. They are filled with joy at seeing the bombing and slaughter of the innocents!

“He had not come to establish an earthly Messianic kingdom – at that time.

John Presco

What Is the Tribulation?

The word “tribulation” means severe trial or suffering, and the Great Tribulation is a time of God’s judgment for man’s rebellion. This period, which lasts seven years, begins with the rapture of the church (more on this later) and during this time God will complete his discipline of Israel and final judgment upon the unbelieving citizens of the world. This will be a period of great trial and great suffering unmatched in human history. Here are two portions of Scripture that give you some insight into this period of tribulation.

“For there will be greater anguish than at any time since the world began. And it will never be so great again. In fact, unless that time of calamity is shortened, not a single person will survive. But it will be shortened for the sake of God’s chosen ones” (Matthew 24:21-22). 

https://www.learnreligions.com/what-is-the-tribulation-700653

Why did Jesus say to Peter, “Get behind me, Satan”?

ANSWER

The command “Get behind me, Satan,” spoken to Peter by Jesus, is recorded in Matthew 16:23 and Mark 8:33. “Get behind me, Satan” seems harsh and out of character for Jesus, especially when addressing Peter, one of His most devout disciples. Why did Jesus say this? What was it Peter did to deserve such a rebuke? Without knowing it, Peter was speaking for Satan.

Where’s The Evangelical Penis Patrol?

“I have come for sinners”

The Prophet of The Cross and Red Star

Get Behind Me Satan – Michael Johnson!