Pennsylvania Senate candidates John Fetterman and Dr. Mehmet Oz participate in a debate on October 25 in Harrisburg, PA. (NewsNation)
In the debate last night, Doctor Oz (DOCTOR-ZARDOZ) pushed the Federal Government out of Pennsylvania, in regards to the Abortion Issue, and anointed LOCAL POLITICIANS to Rule on this Godly Matter. This means OZ will decide – if elected. Does Oz own any Biblical knowledge? Was he trained in a church? Did you know the Ten Commandments are listed in the severity of the crime?
In the Supreme Court repeal of Woe vs. Wade, it is not Ruled that aborting the un-born – IS MURDER – yet many religious spokespeople want this. Murder is way down on the list, along with bearing (bringing) false witness. No.1 is………..
- 1. Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
- 2. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. .
What is the punishment for breaking the Top Two Commandments – that have everything to do with the Reformation that was ruled a heresy. The Protestants accused the Papacy of making graven images? How many American Voters read about the Saint Bartholomew Massacre – and know about FORCED CIRCUMSCISSION?.
Here is a list of PUNNISHMENTS BY GOD. Back then, He is keenly interested in punishing us a WHOLE – before He got down to more personalized punishments – which gave birth to the Supreme Court. Oh no! Was that a good idea? How – USURPING!
https://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=16785
Around fifty years before Jesus was born, the Sanhedrin did away with THE JUDGING OF THE SOTAH. Why? Did it have to do with the sin of bearing false witness, wherefore the man who accused a woman of committing adultery – would be guilty of breaking a Commandment – when she was judged innocent of the accusation?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanhedrin
Chief Justice, Clarence Thomas, ruled that Senator Lindsey Graham, does not have to TESTIFY in regards to the FALSE ACCUSATION the Democrats stole the election from President Trump. Is Trump breaking the Ninth Commandment?
Saint Paul, THE FATHER OF CHRISTIANITY, ruled that Mosaic Laws no longer matter. Does this include the laws against homosexuality? There is no mention of ABORTION in the Torah. If there was, there would exist no crime against it – after Jesus is crucified! His blood has negated Jewish Law.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judaizers
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_circumcision
John Wilson is my ninth grandfather. He and his Puritan Brethren RULED on many Biblical and Church issues. PUBLICLY SHAMING offenders was called for. Witches – were burned and hung. There was no television or radio. Did local papers cover these punishments’? We held elections two years ago……AND WE HAVE BEEN SUBJECTED TO NON-STOP SHAME CAMPAINGING – that got the Supreme Court involved. The Republican Party used this court to empower their party that they claim is BLESSED BY THE ONE GOD! It is not a matter of God’s Justice anymore. It’s all about GETTING VOTES – at all costs – by any means! Perhaps Trump and the Republican Party should ADMIT the Democrats did not steal the election – if they agree to support the Eleventh Commandment – so We won’t keep making the same mistake?
11. Thou shalt not steal elections for the sake of Democracy
How about another one – for the road!
12. Thou shalt not say any election was stolen for the sake of Democracy
Does God consider our Democracy – an APOSTASY?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostasy
Today is October 26, 2022. I am going to post this blog on the Facebook of, Tina Kotek, Betsey Johnson, and, Christine Drazan How about Fetterman and Oz?
Pandora’s Box has been opened! We all have been taken down this road, down the Yellow Brick Road. Kingdoms have made laws before, but, our National God is keenly interested that we do not worship other gods, or, make images of those gods. THE ONE GOD, does not give a rat’s ass about abortion and homosexuality. HIS main concern is………WE BELIEVE HE EXISTS! There is no proof our Founding Fathers founded this Democracy to – PROVE THERE IS A GOD! None! Here are the three questions I will be asking the five politicians seen above.
- Do you own any proof the election was stolen?
- Do you believe women who want an abortion should talk to a representative of God, before they get an abortion. And, after they got an abortion?
- Do you own any proof God exists?
Who knows, maybe Tina inherited an old shoe box from Granny, and in it is – one of the nails used to crucify Jesus? Doesn’t hurt to ask!
After careful consideration, I am all for Pollical Lawmakers passing a law that makes aborting a fetus a capitol offence, and thus, conspiring to murder a fetus, is also a felony. Our Democracy is not supposed to make laws that pass judgment on those engage in Victimless Crimes. But because a reversal by the Supreme Court will destroy the Rule of Law, and our Democracy, its best we go for MURDER! We can make this the 28th. Amendment. While we are at it, lets go for the 29th.
29. No law shall be made that forces any member of this Democracy to provide proof God exists.
The 30th. amendment should be passed at the same time as the 29th. so as not to culturally exclude Christians by giving a powerful indication – God did found this Democracy. This amendment is inspired by Leviticus 20:14
30. And if a man take a wife and her mother, it is wickedness: they shall be burnt with fire, both he and they; that there be no wickedness among you.
Can We The People agree, that having sexual relations with your mother-in-law is a BAD IDEA – even a capitol crime – punishable by death by fire? How would you like to stand trial alongside your wife’s mother – who might turn on you – sing like a canary! How many politicians have slept with their mother-in-law? Care to make a guess?
John Presco
President: Royal Rosamond Press
Return of the Scarlet Letter
Posted on August 7, 2018 by Royal Rosamond Press
“There should not be involvement from the federal government in how states decide their abortion decisions,” Oz said Tuesday. “As a physician, I’ve been in the room when there’s some difficult conversations happening. I don’t want the federal government involved with that at all.”
He added: “I want women, doctors, local political leaders, letting the democracy that’s always allowed our nation to thrive, putting the best ideas forward so states can decide for themselves.”
The comment sparked consternation from health care groups, which have long argued such decisions should be kept between patients and their doctors.
Most Christians believe that much of the Old Covenant has been superseded, and many believe it has been completely abrogated and replaced by the Law of Christ.[9] The Christian debate over Judaizing began in the lifetime of the apostles, notably at the Council of Jerusalem and the incident at Antioch.[2][3] It has been carried on parallel to continuing debates about Paul the Apostle and Judaism, Protestant views of the Ten Commandments, and Christian ethics.
In addition to violating the first two commandments (Ex 20:3-6, Dt 5:7-10), the prohibition against false prophets is clearly set forth in Deuteronomy by Moses to the second generation of Israelites that were rescued from slavery in Egypt and were preparing to enter the Promised Land of Canaan.
If a prophet, or one who foretells by dreams, appears among you and announces to you a miraculous sign or wonder, and if the sign or wonder of which he has spoken takes place, and he says, “Let us follow other gods” (gods you have not known) “and let us worship them”, you must not listen to the words of that prophet or dreamer. The LORD your God is testing you to find out whether you love him with all your heart and with all your soul. It is the LORD your God you must follow, and him you must revere. Keep his commands and obey him; serve him and hold fast to him. That prophet or dreamer must be put to death, because he preached rebellion (Heb: sara) against the LORD your God, who brought you out of Egypt and redeemed you from the land of slavery; he has tried to turn (Heb: nadah) you from the way the LORD your God commanded you to follow. You must purge the evil from among you (Dt 13:1-5).
https://www.addeigloriam.org/commentary/ot-law/death-penalty-false-prophets.htm
| Laws Punishable By Death Leviticus 20:9-16 The Laws Punishable By Death Bible scriptures located in Leviticus 20:9-16 explains directly from God’s Word the Laws Punishable By Death topic. | ||
| Leviticus 20:9 | For every one that curseth his father or his mother shall be surely put to death: he hath cursed his father or his mother; his blood shall be upon him. | |
| Leviticus 20:10 | And the man that committeth adultery with another man’s wife, even he that committeth adultery with his neighbor’s wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death. | |
| Leviticus 20:11 | And the man that lieth with his father’s wife hath uncovered his father’s nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. | |
| Leviticus 20:12 | And if a man lie with his daughter in law, both of them shall surely be put to death: they have wrought confusion; their blood shall be upon them. | |
| Leviticus 20:13 | If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. | |
| Leviticus 20:14 | And if a man take a wife and her mother, it is wickedness: they shall be burnt with fire, both he and they; that there be no wickedness among you. | |
| Leviticus 20:15 | And if a man lie with a beast, he shall surely be put to death: and ye shall slay the beast. | |
| Leviticus 20:16 | And if a woman approach unto any beast, and lie down thereto, thou shalt kill the woman, and the beast: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bible_and_homosexuality
Chapters 18 and 20 of Leviticus form part of the Holiness code and list prohibited forms of intercourse, including the following verses:
- “You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.” Chapter 18 verse 22[8]
- “If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them.” Chapter 20 verse 13[9]
EUGENE, Oregon — University of Oregon officials are apologizing for “despicable chants” directed at BYU fans and their religion in the second half of the Ducks’ 41-20 win over the Cougars Saturday at Autzen Stadium.
The chants emanated from at least three Oregon fans and drew a rebuke on Twitter from Utah Gov. Spencer Cox on Saturday night after video of the fans chanting the religious slur surfaced on Twitter.
https://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=16785
https://www.learnreligions.com/ninth-commandment-thou-shalt-not-bear-false-witness-250908
What Is False Witness?
It seems as though the concept of “false witness” might have been originally intended to prohibit nothing more than lying in a court of law. For the ancient Hebrews, anyone caught lying during their testimony could be forced to submit to whatever punishment would have been imposed upon the accused – even including death. It must be remembered that the legal system of the time didn’t include a position of official state prosecutor. In effect, anyone coming forward to accuse someone of a crime and bear witness against them served as prosecutor for the people.
Brethren and Sistren
It has come to my attention that not only are many of our members unable to correctly recite all of The Ten Commandments, but those who can remember even a few, invariably get the sequence wrong.
Let me set the record straight: The commandments do not come in a random sequence. With the exception of the 7th Commandment — an obvious anomaly — the Commandments appear in order of severity. The harsher the punishment, the closer to the top.
I hope this handy color chart will make the intrinsic beauty of God’s word more comprehensible to all:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_circumcision
R1 Maccabees relates the story of how Mattathias (ca. 166 BC) forcibly circumcised the sons of Jewish parents who had abandoned the rite.[6] Forced circumcision of Gentiles by Jews is attested from the second century BC onwards. In 125 BC John Hyrcanus conquered Edom, which the Romans called Idumea; and the Idumeans were forcibly converted to Judaism, by threat of exile or death, depending on the source.[7][8] As reported by Josephus, circumcision was required of the Idumeans:
Hyrcanus took also Dora and Marissa, cities of Idumea, and subdued all the Idumeans; and permitted them to stay in that country, if they would circumcise their genitals, and make use of the laws of the Jews; and they were so desirous of living in the country of their forefathers, that they submitted to the use of circumcision, and the rest of the Jewish ways of living; at which time therefore this befell them, that they were hereafter no other than Jews.
Roman Empire[edit]
See also: History of the Jews in the Roman Empire
Greeks and Romans regarded circumcision as a mutilation of the male genitalia, but the practice is little discussed in Roman literary sources until the second century of the Christian era.[15] There was a circumcision controversy in Early Christianity but this was resolved at the Council of Jerusalem c.50 which made it clear that circumcision of gentile converts to Christianity was not required.[16] Josephus (who changed his allegiance from the Jews to the Roman Flavians) reports that two Roman officers who had taken refuge with Galileans during the war with Rome (early 67 AD) were put under pressure to convert to Judaism. Josephus, declaring that “every one should worship God in accordance with the dictates of his own conscience,” claims to have saved the two Gentiles from forced circumcision.[17] After the First Roman-Jewish War, a head tax, the Fiscus Judaicus, was levied against all Jews. According to Suetonius, Domitian (c.90) also applied this tax to those who were circumcisied, even if they claimed they were not Jews. Titus Flavius Clemens was put to death in 95 for adopting Jewish customs. In 96 Nerva relaxed the Jewish tax as applying only to those who professed to be Jews. Sometime between 128 and 132 AD, the emperor Hadrian seems to have temporarily banned circumcision, on pain of death.[18] Antoninus Pius exempted Jews from the ban,[19] as well as Egyptian priests,[20] and Origen (d. ca. 253) says that in his time only Jews were permitted to practice circumcision.[21] Legislation under Constantine, the first Christian emperor, freed any slave who was subjected to circumcision; in the year 339, circumcising a slave became punishable by death.[22]
The opening chapter of Paul’s letter to the Galatians takes on a much different tone than many of his other letters. He is much harsher because he is rightfully concerned that the Good News — the Gospel of Jesus Christ — is being subverted by those who presumably are Christians but come to the Galatians with a false doctrine. And he expresses astonishment that the Galatians are buying it and “deserting” his teachings.
The Judaizers of Galatia were claiming to be Christians but also insisting that salvation came from adherence to Mosaic Law. They believed they were saved through such adherence and good works. In essence, they were missing the most important Gospel message by requiring that Christians continue to live as Jews.
To enhance his own credibility, Paul reminds them of his own epiphany and transformation. He once lived by the old law and even “intensely persecuted the church of God and tried to destroy it.” But that was before his road to Damascus encounter with Christ, after which his understanding of the New Covenant and his message came directly through revelations from Jesus.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judaizers
Most Christians believe that much of the Old Covenant has been superseded, and many believe it has been completely abrogated and replaced by the Law of Christ.[9] The Christian debate over Judaizing began in the lifetime of the apostles, notably at the Council of Jerusalem and the incident at Antioch.[2][3] It has been carried on parallel to continuing debates about Paul the Apostle and Judaism, Protestant views of the Ten Commandments, and Christian ethics.
In the New Testament, the Judaizers were a group of Jewish Christians who insisted that their co-religionists should follow the Mosaic Law and that Gentile converts to Christianity must first be circumcised (i.e. become Jewish through the ritual of a proselyte).[1][2][3][19][20][21][22] Although such repressive and legalistic requirements may have made Christianity a much less appealing religious choice for the vast majority of Gentiles,[4][13][14][15] the evidence afforded in Paul’s Epistle to the Galatians exhibits that, initially, a significant number of the Galatian Gentile converts appeared disposed to adopt these restrictions; indeed, Paul st
1 Corinthians 6:9–11; 1 Timothy 1:8–11[edit]
In the context of the broader immorality of his audience, Paul the Apostle wrote in the First Epistle to the Corinthians, chapter 6 verses 9-11:
Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate (malakos), nor abusers of themselves with mankind (arsenokoitai), Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.[41]
1 Timothy 1:8–11 states:
But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully; Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers; For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind (arsenokoitai), for menstealers, for liars, for perjur
Here.
In Major Shift, LDS Church Rolls Back Controversial Policies Toward LGBT Members
April 4, 20195:42 PM ET
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints announced Thursday that it will no longer consider people in same-sex marriages to be apostates. Here, a pride flag flies in front of the Historic Mormon Temple in Salt Lake City as part of a 2015 protest of the church’s LGBT policies.
George Frey/Getty Images
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints announced on Thursday that it was reversing its controversial 2015 policy that classified people in same-sex marriages as “apostates.” The church, widely known as the Mormon church, had also barred the children of such marriages from blessing or baptism until age 18.
The change was attributed to President Dallin Oaks, and the church said it was intended to “help affected families” and “to reduce the hate and contention so common today.”
Children of parents who identify themselves as lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender may now be blessed as infants and baptized.
The 2015 policy had divided the church, and many members felt it punished children. The children of such marriages could only be baptized once they turned 18, and to do so they needed to move out of the household and disavow same-sex cohabitation and marriage. In protest, at least 1,000 members of the faith showed up in Salt Lake City to formally resign their membership.
The move may be seen as loosening a highly restrictive approach to its LGBT members, but the church reiterated that it considers same-sex marriage by a member to be “a serious transgression.”
Sponsor Message
“While we cannot change the Lord’s doctrine, we want our members and our policies to be considerate of those struggling with the challenges of mortality,” the church said in its message, released during a general conference leadership session of the First Presidency in Salt Lake City.
A news release issued by the church attributed the policy change to “continuing revelation.”
The church said that “immoral conduct in heterosexual or homosexual relationships will be treated in the same way.”
THE TWO-WAY
Mormon Church Declares Same-Sex Couples To Be Apostates
But some took issue with that line, as the LDS church does not recognize same-sex marriage as being the same as a heterosexual marriage, which it calls “eternal marriage.”
“[If] homosexual sex within marriage is wrong and heterosexual sex within marriage is great, we’re not treating ‘immoral conduct in heterosexual or homosexual relationships…in the same way,’ ” as one person noted on Twitter.
Rosamond Press 