Lying Christian Devils For Satan-Trump

This Devil was pardoned by Trump so he could make-up more lies for the racist Republican party who has to censor this evil history – they know is untrue! How can this be the party of Christians? Christian leaders have to denounce this ex-con and his work. There is a good chance Dinesh D’Souza has a powerful influence on Trump who aspires to be the greatest president of all time, greater than Lincoln, and Franklin Delano Roosevelt – who Dinesh demonizes, along with all Democrats. D’Souza ignores the history of the Dixiecrats and my kindred John Fremont, who was chosen by Radical Republicans to be the first Republican Presidential Candidate. Many of these radicals were Turner Germans. Three of my grandfathers were Turners. For eight years I have been ordering Lying Christian Propagandist to “GET OUT” of my families party and form their own party.

‘The Liars For Jesus Party’

Does this Turd-brain believe he has deceived Jesus, and, Jesus does not care if he lies for him? This is a demon! Snake-man is lying for votes. He is not going for the truth, but for swing-votes of the ignorant. He misuses the college education he got in OUR democracy to undermine the two party system and destroy the Democrats! I want to debate him – on Fox News! I want to destroy him in the name of the Abolitionist Jesus!

I need a book! I need more exposure! I need to break out of the prison friends and family made for me because they sensed I was right, and they were wrong.

Jon Presco

Weeks after being pardoned by President Donald Trump, Dinesh D’Souza is unveiling the trailer for his latest movie. Quality Flix opens the conservative’s latest documentary film, Death of a Nation, in 1,000 theaters on Aug. 3.

The film likens Abraham Lincoln to Donald Trump — saying that the situations they found themselves in as U.S. presidents are very similar, according to the filmmaker.

“Lincoln was elected to unite a country and stop slavery. Democrats smeared him; went to war against him; assassinated him. Now, their target is Trump,” D’Souza intones at the top of the trailer before announcing the movie is produced by Gerald Molen, the Oscar-winning producer of Schindler’s List and Jurassic Park.

D’Souza’s first three films, 2016: Obama’s America; America: Imagine a World Without Her; and Hillary’s America: The Secret History of the Democratic Party, were huge hits as far as documentaries go.

They were also very controversial, and D’Souza’s newest effort promises to be doubly so, considering its favorable treatment of Trump comes on the heels of a presidential pardon for the filmmaker, who was on probation for using straw donors to give more to a friend’s campaign for U.S. senator than the law allows.

The States’ Rights Democratic Party (usually called the Dixiecrats) was a short-lived segregationist political party in the United States. It originated in 1948 as a breakaway faction of the Democratic Party determined to protect states’ rights to legislate racial segregation from what its members regarded as an oppressive federal government.[1] Supporters assumed control of the state Democratic parties in part or in full in several Southern states. The Party opposed racial integration and wanted to retain Jim Crow laws and white supremacy in the face of possible federal intervention. Its members were referred to as “Dixiecrats”, a portmanteau of “Dixie“, referring to the Southern United States, and “Democrat”.

At a time when the left and the media routinely liken President Trump and the Republicans to fascism, it is time to report on a little secret history that has been nicely buried by progressive historiography. Normally history cannot be so easily tucked away, but in this case, the left is so dominant in academia and the media that it has been able to get away with it.

The reason for the concealment project is to cover up the sins of the progressive icon Franklin Roosevelt and of American progressivism more generally. What’s reported here—the left’s early romance with fascism and national socialism—is a major embarrassment for the future prospects of the left. How can the left claim to be the party of “progress” and all things good, true and beautiful when the record shows the left was in bed with Mussolini and, to a lesser extent, Hitler?



Dinesh Joseph D’Souza (/dɪˈnɛʃ dəˈszə/; born April 25, 1961) is an Indian American conservative political commentator, author and filmmaker who has been described as far-right.[1][2][3][4][5][6] Born in Bombay, D’Souza came to the United States as an exchange student and graduated from Dartmouth College. He became a naturalized citizen in 1991. From 2010 to 2012, he was president of The King’s College, a Christian school in New York City.[7][8][9] Many of his works discuss Christian apologetics and are critical of New Atheism.[10][11][12]

On May 20, 2014, D’Souza pleaded guilty in federal court to one felony charge of using a “straw donor” to make an illegal campaign contribution to a 2012 United States Senate campaign.[13][14] On September 23, he was sentenced to eight months in a halfway house near his home in San Diego, five years probation, and a $30,000 fine.[15][16] On May 31, 2018, D’Souza was issued a full pardon by President Donald Trump.[17]

D’Souza is the author of several New York Times best-selling books.[18][19] In 2012, D’Souza released his film 2016: Obama’s America, an anti-Obama polemic based on his 2010 book The Roots of Obama’s Rage; the film is the second-highest-grossing political documentary-style film produced in the United States.[20] In 2016, he released a documentary-style film and book, both entitled Hillary’s America, which offers his perspective on the history of the Democratic Party. Widely characterized as a provocateur, D’Souza’s films and commentary have been the subject of considerable controversy due to his promotion of multiple conspiracy theories.

In 1995 D’Souza published The End of Racism, in which he claimed that exaggerated claims of racism are holding back progress among African Americans in the US; he defended the Southern slave owner, and notes that “The American slave was treated like property, which is to say, pretty well”.[37] A reviewer for The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education responded by posting a list of sixteen recent racist incidents against black people.[38] Michael Bérubé, in a lengthy review article, referred to the book as “encyclopedic pseudoscience”, calling it illogical and saying some of the book’s policy recommendations are fascist; it is “so egregious an affront to human decency as to set a new and sorry standard for ‘intellectual'”.[39] The book was panned by many other critics as well: John David Smith, in The Journal of Southern History, says D’Souza claims blacks are inferior and opines that “D’Souza bases his terribly insensitive, reactionary polemic on sound bite statistical and historical evidence, frequently gleaned out of context and patched together illogically. His book is flawed because he ignores the complex causes and severity of white racism, misrepresents Boas’s arguments, and undervalues the matrix of ignorance, fear, and long-term economic inequality that he dubs black cultural pathology. How, according to his own logic, can allegedly inferior people uplift themselves without government assistance”. D’Souza’s “biased diatribe trivializes serious pathologies, white and black, and adds little to our understanding of America’s painful racial dilemma”.[40] Paul Finkelman comments on D’Souza’s trivialization of racism, and says, in a review article called “The Rise of the New Racism”, that much of what D’Souza says is untrue, and much is only partially true; that the book is “like a parody of scholarship, where selected ‘facts’ are pulled out of any recognizable context, and used to support a particular viewpoint”. In Finkelman’s opinion, the book exemplifies a “new racism”, which “(1) denies the history of racial oppression in America; (2) rejects biological racism in favor of an attack on black culture; and (3) supports formal, de jure equality in order to attack civil rights laws that prohibit private discrimination and in order to undermine any public policies that might monitor equality and give it substantive meaning”.[41]

Get The Hell Out of My Party

The Sons of Confederate Veterans under Denne Sweeney claim they are only recreating their beloved history, and are not Traitors reborn. Well, if this is true, then I highly suggest you get out of Fremont’s Republican Party, and become Democrats – again! Three years ago I registered as a Republican Prophet, who clearly saw your true motives, and drove Fremont’s flags into the heart of your Dragon!Get out!

Jon the Nazarite

Radical Republicans

From Wikipedia

This article is about the American political faction. For other meanings, see Radical Republicans (disambiguation).
The Radical Republicans were a loose faction of Americanpoliticians within the Republican Party from about 1854 (before the American Civil War) until the end of Reconstructionin 1877. They called themselves “radicals” and were opposed during the war by moderates and conservative factions led by Abraham Lincolnand after the war by self-described “conservatives” (in the South) and “Liberals” (in the North). Radicals strongly opposed slavery during the war and after the war distrusted ex-Confederates, demanding harsh policies for Reconstruction.[1]

During the war, Radical Republicans often opposed Lincoln in terms of selection of generals (especially his choice of George B. McClellanfor top command) and his efforts to bring states back into the Union. The Radicals passed their own Reconstruction plan through Congress in 1864, but Lincoln vetoed it and was putting his own policies in effect when he was assassinated in 1865.[2]Radicals pushed for the uncompensated abolition of slavery, while Lincoln wanted to pay loyal owners. After the war the Radicals demanded Civil rights for freedmen(the newly freed slaves), such as measures ensuring the suffrage (right to vote). They initiated the Reconstruction Acts, and limited political and voting rights for ex-Confederates. The Radicals were vigorously opposed by the Democratic Party and usually by moderate and Liberal Republicans as well.[3]

“Get out of my families party!”



jesusconstThere is a civil war brewing in the Republican party. For several years I have been ordering Christian-X, and the Tea Party, to get out of the Republican Party founded by my kindred. Many evangelicals are claiming America belongs to them. They say it is their heritage divinely given to them by Jesus. I disagree – sometimes as a Nazarite. I have one person in my church – me!

Now that a radical Christian faction of the Republican party is threatening to shut down government, I believe it is vital their claim as owners of this Democracy be severely challenged! This Holy Deed must be refuted and taken away from them just incase it is the MOTIVE for creating chaos!

“Hey! They own America, so they have the right to do what they please.”

Jon Presco

He also said that if Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid nixes the House plan, then “he’s responsible for shutting down the government.”

Reid said last week he would keep the health law intact despite Republicans’ attempts, in his words, “to take an entire law hostage simply to appease the Tea Party anarchists.”

Sen. Claire McCaskill, a Missouri Democrat, told Fox News that Cruz’s efforts were destructive and self-serving as he eyes a White House campaign.

“This is about running for president with Ted Cruz,” she said. “This isn’t about meaningful statesmanship.”

WASHINGTON — With one week left before a possible government shutdown, congressional debate has exposed deep divisions within the Republican Party, pitting tea-party-backed conservatives against their colleagues.
Budget moves orchestrated by tea party leader Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas have encountered outright hostility from fellow Republican senators who say his strategy does not appear to have an endgame.

“I didn’t go to Harvard or Princeton, but I can count,” Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) said last week in a not-so-veiled swipe on Twitter at Cruz, who studied at both schools. Cruz’s strategy is leading the party into a “box canyon” and “will fail and weaken our position,” Corker said.
Several key Republicans have distanced themselves from their more firebrand colleagues. A sign of the party’s public relations pretzel was clear Saturday as the conservative advocacy group Heritage Action for America urged senators to block the bill, which on Friday it had urged House Republicans to pass.

“If we could do this, we should do it. But we can’t,” Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) said on “Face the Nation” on Sunday.

The Washington budget battle intensified Sunday, with House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi saying Republicans’ ultimatum to either defund ObamaCare or risk a government shutdown is “legislative arson.”

“This is totally irresponsible, completely juvenile, and, as I called it, ‘legislative arson,’ ” the California Democrat told CNN’s “State of the Union.” “It’s just destructive.”

But top Republicans publicly and privately say a filibuster could be a losing proposition. Not only would the party probably face public blame — much as it did during the last government shutdowns in 1995 and ’96 — but there is no simple exit strategy even if it succeeds.
Several key Republicans have distanced themselves from their more firebrand colleagues. A sign of the party’s public relations pretzel was clear Saturday as the conservative advocacy group Heritage Action for America urged senators to block the bill, which on Friday it had urged House Republicans to pass.

About Royal Rosamond Press

I am an artist, a writer, and a theologian.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.