“Lee Harvey Oswald could not have acted alone in assassinating President John F Kennedy, according to a new study by Italian weapons experts of the type of rifle Oswald used in the shootings.”
Lee Harvey Oswald shot at General Walker and missed, yet, he was able to fire three shots at Kennedy in a very short time, two of those shots hitting a – moving target! Walker was sitting at a desk. Oswald’s bullet struck the window frame. What happened to that bullet? Walker swears he saw TWO men driving off. This is key, because Walker and others would want to have pro-Castro killers threatening the United States in revenge for the failed Bay of Pigs – so that another invasion would take place to kill Castro who was sending assasins to America to kill important people.
If Oswald was pro-Castro, then this is the last thing he would want to happen. This would be the case for ALL pro-Castro people, including any Russians. Here is the motive for manufacturing a pro-Castro Russian-like opperative to take a shot at Walker and Kennedy. The shot at Walker was susposed to miss in order to make Walker a co-Martyr who would replace the adoration many Texans had for Kennedy. Walker would be the champion of the people and would lead the charge back into Cuba. Lee was not stupid. He had to know the bullets he fired would be a death sentence for Castro and his revolution.
Something, or someone convinced Lee to change political course, put another goal in his sights. Try as he did, Lee failed to gather a following. Real pro-Castro groups suspected Lee was trying to infiltrate them. However, it appears Lee found a backer in William Reilly who employed Lee at his coffee company, but, susposedly fired him because he was spending all his time in a nearby garage reading rifle magazines. Anti-Castro folks in the U.S. were also looking at rifle magazines. Did Reilly fire Oswald – for looks? If Lee was an now a Anti-Castro agent, then he was not hired to do any work, but, is a soldier on the payroll. And, he is studying weapons.
Who else is looking at rifles in a magazine in Adrian Alba’s garage? How many cheap Italian rifles were ordered from a magazine? This is not a lone crazed gunman. Lee is in contact with many people whom he could share his radical ideas with, and vise versa. Was William Rielly in contact with the White Russians, who would have no qualms about shooting OUR President, because these are men without a country who are trained and highly experience Commie Killers – who could kill Castro if they tried. That was not the objective. The objective was to get the most powerful army in the world, and its nuclear weapons, aimed at the Russians who were pro-Castro. We know this is feasible, because Bush conspired with foreign leaders to make the world believe ‘The Evil One’ in Iraq was making nuclear weapons in order to kill his enemies.
The last thing Russia wanted was a pro-Castro, pro-Communist Russia lover, to kill Kennedy, especially after he showed willingness to make an arms agreement and ratched down the cold war. Indeed, Kennedy now looked like he was pro-Castro, and Pro-Russia, after his speech at the American University.
Last night, on MSNBC, Bobby Kennedy Jr. was asked if Jack was a Man of Peace. He said Jack was surrounded by WW2 Generals who wanted him to strike at Russian before it nuclear and military capability equaled out own. This would be Walker’s desire as well. Was he conversing with the generals around Kennedy, and suggesting drastic measures? Did Kennedy see that shot at Walker as a warning? Jack was very aware many armed men wanted him to change course, and go into Cuba again, because that would start a war with Russia.
Did Reilly put Lee in contact with the White Russians, or, vie versa? Did they tell Lee he and Marina will be heroes when the White Revolution takes back Russia, and indeed, this couple WITHOUT A COUNTRY, would be treated like royalty. All he need do is take a shot at Kennedy in Texas – and miss!
Did Lee get off that shot – that missed. Then, to his horror he heard two more shots?
Why didn’t the U.S. invade Cuba after Kennedy was killed? What agencies were aware that things were not what they appear? Who knew the truth? How about the Texan, LBJ? Surely Johnson knew all about General Walker’s crazy ambitions. How about the White Russians?
Jon Presco
Oswald returned to New Orleans on April 24, 1963.[66] Marina’s friend, Ruth Paine, drove her by car from Dallas to join Oswald in New Orleans the next month in May.[67] On May 10, Oswald was hired by the Reily Coffee Company whose owner (William Reily) was a backer of the Crusade to Free Cuba Committee, an anti-Castro organization.[68] Oswald worked as a machinery greaser at Reily, but he was fired in July “…because his work was not satisfactory and because he spent too much time loitering in [Adrian Alba’s] garage next door, where he read rifle and hunting magazines.”[69][70] (Alba was proprietor of the Crescent City Garage and had a contract to look after a number of cars for the nearby Secret Service and FBI offices.
The Crusade to Free Cuba Committee was founded in December 1961 by anti-Castro Cuban exile Sergio Arcacha Smith to raise funds and support for the CIA-backed Cuban Revolutionary Council, a group formerly known as the Cuban Democratic Revolutionary Front.[1][2]
http://www.jfklibrary.org/Asset-Viewer/BWC7I4C9QUmLG9J6I8oy8w.aspx
http://www.timcomm.com/JFK_3-Shot_Mystery.html
In fresh tests of the Mannlicher-Carcano bolt-action weapon, supervised by the Italian army, it was found to be impossible for even an accomplished marksman to fire the shots quickly enough.
The findings will fuel continuing theories that Oswald was part of a larger conspiracy to murder the 35th American president on 22 November 1963.
The official Warren Commission inquiry into the shooting concluded the following year that Oswald was a lone gunman who fired three shots with a Carcano M91/38 bolt-action rifle in 8.3 seconds.
Related Articles
Oswald ‘was the sole assassin of JFK’
13 May 2007
Call for rethink on Kennedy shooting
18 May 2007
But when the Italian team test-fired the identical model of gun, they were unable to load and fire three shots in less than 19 seconds – suggesting that a second gunman must have been present in Dealey Plaza, central Dallas, that day.
Two of the bullets hit Kennedy, with the first – the so called “magic bullet”, ridiculed by conspiracy theorists – also wounding the governor of Texas, John B Connally, after it had struck the president.
In a further challenge to the official conclusions, the Italian team conducted two other tests at the former Carcano factory in Terni, north of Rome, where the murder weapon was made in 1940.
They fired bullets through two large pieces of meat, in an attempt to simulate the assumed path of the magic bullet. In their test, the bullet was deformed, unlike the first bullet in the Kennedy assassination, which remained largely intact.
The second bullet is thought to have missed its target. According to the commission, the third disintegrated when it hit Kennedy’s head. The new research suggests, however, that this is incompatible with the fact that Oswald was only 80 yards away, in a book depository, when he fired. The Italian tests suggest that a bullet fired from that distance would have emerged intact from Kennedy’s head, implying that the third shot must instead have come from a more distant location.
The findings will encourage conspiracy theorists who hold that Oswald could not have fired three shots in time. For each shot, he would have had to push up the gun’s bolt handle, pull the bolt backwards to eject the spent cartridge case and then forward to slide the next round into the chamber, before turning down the bolt handle to lock it in place.
Nearly seven out of 10 Americans believe that Kennedy was murdered as a result of a plot. Depending on which theory they back, the participants supposedly included any or all of the CIA, the Mafia, the Cubans, the FBI chief J Edgar Hoover, the military-industrial complex and Vice-President Lyndon B Johnson.
It is the second challenge in two months to the view of the Warren Commission that Oswald acted alone. In May, researchers at Texas A&M University argued that the ballistics evidence used to rule out a second gunman had been misinterpreted.
The findings will be a frustration to Vincent Bugliosi, the author of a 1,600-page book, also published in May, which claimed to put to rest all the conspiracy theories of the past 44 years.
The Italian findings will be hotly contested by those who believe that Oswald was a lone gunman – not least because they contradict firing tests previously conducted, using Oswald’s actual rifle, by the FBI and the US Marines, and another study by Washington police marksmen using an identical gun.
Oswald would only have needed to reload the weapon twice in the eight seconds to get off all three shots, since the time was measured only from the moment he fired the first shot. The FBI concluded that a marksman could have fired a shot at least every 2.3 seconds.
In his book, Mr Bugliosi details how after just two or three minutes’ practice with the gun in 1979, three police marksmen aiming at three targets representing Kennedy at the same distance from Oswald, got away three shots in less than eight seconds.
One marksman hit the targets twice and missed the third shot by an inch. A second shooter scored a “kill” with his second shot.
Mr Bugliosi recounts three separate ballistics tests that found that the magic bullet could have wounded Kennedy and Connally and emerged in similar condition to the real bullet. But that is unlikely to stop the Italian research fuelling another generation of conspiracy writers
Rosamond Press 
Leave a comment