Consider the anti-Christian statement of the religious addict, Michelle Bachman. If this is the message coming from the creme de la creme of the Evangelical Cultists, then consider the return of Jesus, where he orders his faithful to stop giving to these PARISITICAL churches engaged in selfish p;litics, and tithe directly to the poor! Time to cut out the self-righteous middle-nuts!
For ten years I lived in a building new the campus. There were wild parties at the beginning of the year, but, then a whole new dread moved in. These were REAL DRUNKS, who put a notice on my door that informed me they were going to have a very loud party on Saturday, and if I was going to be bothered by the loud noise, I best check into a Motel for the night – instead of calling the police and costing the party throws hundreds of dollars. I took this notice and went to the door of the dude that was going throw the the party.
“Did you put this on everyone door, or did you single out and tag tenants you concluded might complain, even call the police? How dare you signal me out as a stitch! What gave you a clue. Was it my white hair? ”
I want to the managers and these drunks were evicted! I have a right to enjoy my premises.
This last weekend my daughter played the Big Victim in regards to how traumatized she was when I call, how upset I get when she doesnt call me back in six hours, or more. I told her her case is weak, she being my Trustee I need to communicate with. She told me my case was very weak in regards to the photographs she and Bill Cornwell posted on their facebook, where my six year old grandson is in the middle of drinking bouts, or, there is a can or bottle of beer in the same shot. One photo – that I sent my attorney back in July, show Tyler Hunt sitting at a table behind two huge pitchers of beer with a Budweiser sign over his head. He was the only one in the photo. I also sent out of control dialogue from their facebook, that has been closed down!
When my daughter told me I have no right to say bad things about her and her, buddies, I told here she had beat me to the punch. anyone looking at their facebook photo – least reading the dialogue – would conclude these are drunken bums, dudes playing beer swilling Rednecks.
Above we see young college kids that are on the brink of alcoholism positnong, they so comatose, that their alleged friends can mark them up without waking them.
It was my hope my grandson would become an artist.
Both Heather and Bill claimed I called Bill a drunk on facebook. What I did, was everytime I saw, or read about a drunken escapade, I slipped in a sober message that might suggest Bill has a drinking problem he needs to get rid of. But, rather then give up drinking, the solution is for my daughter to get rid of me! How about my grandson, Bill. Should he give me up before you give up? If you truly love my daughter and grandson, you would not ask for such a sacrafice – which is proof you have a real prolbem!
The relgious nut, Micchelle Bacman, suggested the parasitical poor people should give up eating, or be forced to quit by the making of federal laws.
Jon Presco
When more than half of the students surveyed say they drink to get drunk, that sends up a red flag for me. As a counseling psychologist who works with the college population, I suspect that many traditional-age college students (18-22) drink alcohol as a form of “self-medication.” Were they to present themselves for assessment of emotional, behavioral, and family difficulties, they may very well be referred for medical treatment for their problems. Of note as well is the fact that drinking is generally not a “new” problem. Most heavy drinkers arrive on campus with drinking problems.
Ninety percent of all sexual assaults of college students involve alcohol, according to the University of Michigan’s University Health Services. Other statistics include:
» Almost 50 percent of unplanned sex is under the influence of alcohol.
» Sixty percent of STDs were transmitted under the influence of alcohol.
» More than 80 percent of college students have had sex because they were drunk.
» In 67 percent of unplanned pregnancies, the woman reported being drunk
The City-County Health Department frequently sees people coming in for STD, HIV and pregnancy tests because they’ve had unwanted or unplanned sex after a night of drinking.
Unfortunately the Health Department doesn’t offer any programs that help educate teens about the impact alcohol can have on sexual activity, Thompson said.
“Our system is set up to clean up the mess after someone wakes up and alcohol’s worn off,” she said.
Thompson has seen other programs that help teens understand that if they drink, they’re more likely to have unplanned or unwanted sex and teaches them that it’s OK to say no.,
According to the Centers for Disease Control, in 2006, excessive alcohol consumption cost the U.S. $223.5 billion and about half of that overall lost production was shouldered by the federal government.
Though drugs are usually more noted, alcohol consumption is listed as the third leading preventable cause of death.
Researchers said that 79,000 Americans die annually from alcohol related causes, with nearly two-thirds of these deaths attributable to accidents and the remaining dur to excessive drinking and the health problems associated with it.
The CDC defines “excessive drinking” as bypassing U.S. guidelines for moderate drinking: having one or fewer drinks per day for women, and two or fewer for men.
Excessive drinking is categorized as underage drinking, heavy or binge drinking, and consuming alcohol while pregnant.
The CDC says binge drinking did the greatest financial damage due to lost productivity and lost lives. Ten billion dollars a year is the figure now
associated with alcoholism and abuse treatment, with almost half, 43 percent of total health care costs resulting from heavy drinking. Currently, 44 percent of college students report being drunk at least once in the last month.
In a recent speech at the Family Research Council, Republican presidential candidate Michelle Bachmann suggested that if you don’t have a job, you should stop eating. She said, “Our nation needs to stop doing for people what they can and should do for themselves … self reliance means, if anyone will not work, neither should he eat.”
http://www.drudge.com/news/150291/bachmann-jobless-should-stop-eating
Yesterday morning during a speech at the Family Research Council in Washington, Michele Bachmann bashed the unemployed in perhaps the most heartless way possible. After vowing to weaken social safety net programs such as Social Security, Medicare, food stamps, and unemployment benefits, Bachmann said that if you are currently not working, you should not be eating.
“Our nation needs to stop doing for people what they can and should do for themselves. Self reliance means, if anyone will not work, neither should he eat.”
Bachmann is saying that the unemployed should starve themselves and their families since they are out of work through no fault of their own. She might as well have added that the unemployed shouldn’t be allowed to have clothes or a roof over their head. This statement by Bachmann shows how much the Republican Party loathes the unemployed. They have zero compassion for anyone or anything. Even Jesus fed the needy. These Republicans have no Christian values at all, nor do they have humanity
“But whoso hath this world’s good, and seeth his brother have need, and shutteth up his bowels of compassion from him, how dwelleth the love of God in him?” (John 3:17)
For historical reference, Bachmann borrowed her admonition on self reliance from the New Testament, specifically from Paul’s second letter to the Thessalonians (although there is some question as to whether Paul actually penned it). It’s largely an apocalyptic passage written to an early Christian community near Macedonia that primarily deals with the second coming of Christ, or the Parousia. The third chapter, in which the famous adage appears, is thought to be a response to a segment of the community that had become so zealous in their belief that the messianic age had dawned they had stopped working altogether and gave themselves over to religious reflection. This caused much consternation among their more productive brethren, who beseeched Paul to write his letter.
But the person who made the phrase popular is someone I think Bachmann would very much like to distance herself from. In his 1917 book “The State and Revolution,” Vladimir Lenin adopted the adage “He who does not work shall not eat,” describing it as a key component of the path to pure communism. The statement was subsequently adopted by the Soviet Union in its 1936 Constitution, which is sometimes called the Stalin Constitution. Article 12 reads:
“In the U.S.S.R. work is a duty and a matter of honor for every able-bodied citizen, in accordance with the principle: He who does not work, neither shall he eat.”
Corporate welfare is a perjorative term describing a government’s bestowal of money grants, tax breaks, or other special favorable treatment on corporations or selected corporations. The term compares corporate subsidies and welfare payments to the poor, and implies that corporations are much less needy of such treatment than the poor. The Canadian New Democratic Party picked up the term as a major theme in its 1972 federal election campaign.[1] Ralph Nader, an American critic of corporate welfare,[2][3] is often credited with coining the term.[4]
Subsidies considered excessive, unwarranted, wasteful, unfair, inefficient, or bought by lobbying are often called corporate welfare. The label of corporate welfare is often used to decry projects advertised as benefiting the general welfare that spend a disproportionate amount of funds on large corporations, and often in uncompetitive, or anti-competitive ways. For instance, in the United States, agricultural subsidies are usually portrayed as helping honest, hardworking independent farmers stay afloat. However, the majority of income gained from commodity support programs actually goes to large agribusiness corporations such as Archer Daniels Midland, as they own a considerably larger percentage of production.[5]
According to the Cato Institute, the U.S. federal government spent $92 billion on corporate welfare during fiscal year 2006. Recipients included Boeing, Xerox, IBM, Motorola, Dow Chemical, and General Electric.[6]
Alan Peters and Peter Fisher have estimated that state and local governments provide $40-50 billion annually in economic development incentives,[7] which many critics characterize as corporate welfare.
Some economists consider the recent bank bailouts in the United States to be corporate welfare.[8][9] U.S. politicians have also contended that zero-interest loans from the Federal Reserve System to financial institutions during the global financial crisis were a hidden, backdoor form of corporate welfare.[10]
Rosamond Press 
Leave a comment