Franklin Graham Neo-Nazi Sympathizer

North Carolina evangelist Franklin Graham came to the aid of Donald Trump on Wednesday, writing in a Facebook post that the Republican presidential candidate’s proposal to bar Muslims from entering the United States is similar to his own call months ago to stop all Muslim immigration.

Noting that some – including top Republicans such as House Speaker Paul Ryan – are condemning Trump’s plan, Graham wrote that “politicians in Washington seem totally disconnected with reality.”

“For some time, I have been saying that Muslim immigration into the United States should be stopped until we can properly vet them or until the war with Islam is over,” Graham wrote Wednesday. “Donald J. Trump has been criticized by some for saying something similar.”

That criticism has come from across the political and religious spectrum, from former Vice President Dick Cheney to Russell Moore of the Southern Baptist Convention. In editorials, front pages and editorial cartoons, Trump has even been compared to Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini.

But, judging from Graham’s Facebook post, the head of the Charlotte-based Billy Graham Evangelistic Association is sticking by his own controversial and widely criticized views on Islam, a religion of 1.5 billion people around the world.

In his Facebook post, Graham, like Trump, cited statistics from a survey done by the controversial Center for Security Policy that suggested large percentages of American Muslims believe violence against the United States can be justified. The center’s founder and president, Frank Gaffney, has been criticized by conservatives and liberals for allegedly promoting conspiracy theories. The center itself was labeled “an extremist think tank” by the head of the Southern Poverty Law Center, which monitors hate groups.

Graham proposed a ban on Muslim immigration to the United States in July, after the shooting deaths of four Marines by a naturalized U.S. citizen who had posted two Islam-focused writings on a blog. After the terrorist attacks in Paris last month, Graham reiterated his call to bar Muslim immigrants – a position Trump echoed this week.

Reached for comment, Jibril Hough, spokesman for the Islamic Center of Charlotte, called Trump “the political version of Franklin Graham.”

“The scary thing is: The crazier he gets, the more support he gets (in the polls),” Hough said of Trump.

On Wednesday, Graham wrote on Facebook that the reaction to Trump’s comments indicate that “our politicians are not listening to the truth – my prayer is that God will open their eyes.” He urged people to share his Facebook post – more than 43,000 did – and email their representatives in Congress.”

But Graham’s embrace of Trump’s proposal is clearly not shared by everyone in the evangelical Christian community.

Russell Moore, president of the Southern Baptist Convention’s Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, wrote Monday on his blog that “anyone who cares an iota about religious liberty should denounce this reckless, demagogic rhetoric.”

And on Tuesday, at Graham’s own launch of Operation Christmas Child in Charlotte, volunteer Jim David of Lexington, S.C., criticized Trump’s plan as “off base.”

“You can’t target a whole religion,” said David, who attends Saxe Gotha Presbyterian Church. “You have to vet individual people, not the religion.”

In March 2001, The New York Times reported that Samaritan’s Purse had “blurred the line between church and state” in the way it had distributed publicly funded aid to victims of the El Salvador earthquake. Residents from several villages stated they first had to sit through a half-hour prayer meeting before receiving assistance.^[29] In a statement, USAID said Samaritan’s Purse had not violated federal guidelines, but emphasized the need for the organization to “maintain adequate and sufficient separation” between prayer sessions and publicly funded activities.^[30]

In 2003, Samaritan’s Purse was widely criticized within the United Kingdom after its president, Franklin Graham, stated that Islam is a “very evil and wicked religion”,^[31][22] leading to opposition campaigns within the United Kingdom by Islamic leaders.^[32] Samaritan’s Purse responded to accusations of being anti-Islamic by highlighting their long history of non-denominational co-operation and charity work in Baghdad without attempting to preach or proselytize.^[33]

Franklin Graham drew scrutiny in 2009 for drawing a full-time salary from Samaritan’s Purse, while at the same time receiving a full-time salary from Billy Graham Evangelistic Association (BGEA). This was called into question after his 2008 compensation from both organizations totaled $1.2 million. (Most of this was the result of a new IRS rule that required him to re-report deferred retirement contributions that had already been reported over the previous three years.^[34]) Some experts on non-profits have questioned whether one person can perform two full-time jobs leading organizations that employ hundreds and spend hundreds of millions around the world.^[35] In response to the questions about his compensation, Graham decided to give up his salary from BGEA, stating his calling to the ministry “was never based on compensation.” He also had contributions to his retirement plans suspended until the economy bounced back.^[36] However, Graham was again criticized in 2015 when it was revealed he had again taken up his salary from BGEA, and that his annual compensation was significantly higher than that of CEO’s of similar but much larger non-profit organisations ^[37]

When Mark was sixteen he carved out a swastika and a Nazi giving a salute in his friends shop, and hung his Superman over his bed. Mark titled ma a parasite on society because I wanted to be an artist. We stopped eating at the table as a family after Vic was ousted from power, because he conducted Food Abuse. One day, I must write on this topic and appear on a talk show. Food Abuse did not end with King Victor.

One day as we sat watching T.V. eating the dinner I cooked, I tapped on my half-empty glass of milk.

“Execure me! I want to make a Family announcement! I am proud to say that this morning in home room, I stopped standing to salute the flag and pledge allegiance to the flag, because this is pure propaganda, and preparation for the Military. Because my ambition is to be what I am, an Artist and a Man of Peace, then I do not want ,nor do seek, anyone’s approval but my own! Thank you! Now return to the delicious meal I have prepared!”

“I’ve had it!” Mark growled; as he put his tray aside and rush towards me. Standing over me he is screaming till he is red in the face;

“Youre never going to make any money as an artist. No one makes any money as an artist, thus you are a parasite on society. You’ll never amount to anything. You are a leach! A LEACH!”

“You’re the leach. You don’t do shit around here. I want your lightbulb changer job. I want you to go into the kitchen and see if you can whip us up some desert for a change!”

Mark grabs my tray and heaves it to the floor, the glass of milk all the way empty now. I rise up with a right-cross to his jaw, and he throws a left. I throw a series of jabs, and he goes into his whirlwind attack, his head down, his arms spinning like a dervish. I looked for AN opening, AND WITH AN with an upper -cut – Down goes Fraser!

The reason why HBO or SHOWTIME should turn this blog into a Series, is it is the Genesis of cultural Warfare in America. The Presco are the Real McCoys.

When my daughter parroted Bill’S belief that I was a parasite, and thus must be removed from the New and Latest Family Order, I disowned her, put her out of my life, because it broke my heart to see this EXTREME ABUSE of the Family Scapegoat being championed by my own flesh and blood.

I told Heather as she read from the New Nazi Manifesto, that Bill sounds just like Mark.

“You should have Bill read Mark’s essays. Bill will say he has been cheated, by I being your father, and not Mark!”

To know that Mark 2 will have a strong influence on my grandson, is a real defeat, a reversal of all I have tried to do.

Above is a photo of Mark sticking his chest out – like a real man! My uncle Dick is egging him on! Dick lew over sixty bombing missions over Germany. There is a big scar on his chin and cheek when shrapnel flew into the cockpit. When Heather said I was that much more of parasite because I did not serve in the military, I asked;

“Did Bill serve?”

“No,but he wanted to. That’smore then what you wanted to do!”

Uncle Dick and Lillian believed Vic when he declared I was not his son. Marked, smirked when he herd the good news. Getting a job at eighteeen, he moved out, but, never returned with one bag of gorceries, nor did he take his mother to dinner – every! This is because we were a Tribal System, and a martiarchy.

Here is part of Mark’s essay that declares all races not white, as parasite, and pretty much declares all women, parasites. Now that Mark sees that he has like minded folks in the family again, he might come out of hiding and bounce Tyler on his knee – because the Real Family DAddy – is back!

Needless to say, I was the family Jew.

Jon Presco

The Problem With The Women’s Movement

The Woman’s Movement is based on two entirely false premises. The first is that “Women have been oppressed and sexually exploited by Men”. This is just the opposite of what is really true. Women enjoy a privileged position in this society and have been making a living sexually exploiting Men for the last five million years. The second is that “Women want sexual equality”. This is the last thing Women want. It should be clear to even the most casual observer that Women have no intention of giving up a single privilege or prerogative or being Female, nor have they. All traditional Female privileges and prerogatives are intact and Women have no intention of giving them up no matter how much they screech about sexual equality out of the other side of Their face. The Women’s Movement has degenerated into a group of spoiled rotten Females demanding to be even more spoiled rotten than they already are.

What do Women want? This can be defined by be phrase coined by the Women’s Movement, “Having it all”, and can be taken literally. Women want all the privileges and prerogatives of both sexes; and the duties, responsibilities and disadvantages of neither. The first thing the Women’s Movement did was disavow all traditional Female responsibilities. Women no longer are required to cook, sew, clean house or be responsible for any of the duties traditionally assigned to Women. Currently there are no obligations that Women feel bound to perform, especially the ones traditionally undertaken by Men. Men, on the other hand, have not shirked any of Their traditional responsibilities; including protecting, defending and providing for Women and Their Children.

6. And above all, white people do not have to tolerate becoming minorities our own countries and cultures as the non-achieving races of the world decide that the only chance they have of attaining a better quality of life is to elbow their way into white cultures, dump themselves on white people and demand that white people provide them a quality of life they cannot provide themselves in their own countries and cultures.

Most white people will think I am cold and heartless. They feel guilty that they have so much and so many others have so little. They want to help alleviate the suffering of the poor people of the world. But I warn you, you can only help them help themselves, and if they cannot do it for themselves there is little you can do. If you continue to subsidize the population explosion of these non-achieving races they will turn your culture into their culture and you will watch your children suffer the same low quality of life as theirs.

The most important thing you can do for them now is to stop the population explosion of these “poor” people. The sheer numbers are keeping them poor and “enslaving” them as cheap labor.

t should be clear by now that black Americans enjoy a much higher quality of life than they have earned. But they still see themselves as victims because they are not provided with economic parity to white people and they hate us for it. This is irrational because white people don’t do this for each other as explained above. Statistically there are twice as many poor white people than black people, but these poor whites don’t seem to get the same attention.

I will now make the case that black people are the real victimizers in this country. I will use negative racial stereotypes which if not entirely accurate reflect the way black people are perceived in this country.

The first victims of black people are their own children. Blacks have a higher birthrate than whites, 70% of their children are born to unwed mothers and get little help from their fathers. There is a very high infant mortality rate. They know these children are going to grow up in the mean streets of the black communities. They don’t care because I believe too many of them try to use their children to retire on the welfare system. If they want a raise they drop another one. These children are raised to believe they are victims of white oppressors.