I posted this on my Priory YahooGroup, on July 2006. For twenty years – at least – I am trying to prevent what is unfolding on April 7, 2026. This post was made on Rougeknights, another blog that crashed. I suspect sabotage.
John Presco
Anti-Zionism and the Founding of a New Jewish State in America
http://rougeknights.blogspot.com/
President Fillmore turned down Louis Kossuth’s plea for funds to
dispose the Habsburg monarchy from Hungary and form a Democracy. In
1956, America and Britain ignored the cry for help from Hungarian
Freedom Fighters as Russian tanks poured over their borders. For
this reason there is no historic reason why America should be
bringing “God’s gift of Liberty” to Iraq, as President Bush put it.
Rightwing Christians make up 33 % of those who voted for Bush, and
helped create what has been called “Jesusland”. Evangelicals want
the War of Armageddon to get underway, so that the Jews will rebuild
the temple on Zion, and thus bid Jesus to come back for the
Christians at the End Times. To this end Bush’s backers are funding
the return of American-born Jews to Israel and the formation of
settlements. Tobin Armstrong is a Bush backer and mentor of Karl
Rove.
What I will be discussing in my blog is a New Exodus, where the
nation of Israel is abandoned, and the New Nation of Israel formed
in Texas along the Rio Grande River. American taxpayers have given
Israel billions of dollars in arms in order to defend themselves and
live in Peace. It is now obvious this Peace is not possible, and the
whole world will be spending a trillion dollars as the result of
this latest war. Gas prices are going to be highere then ever
before, and thus the Stock Market is being severely hurt, and thus
the World Economy.
Osama Bin Laden attacked the World Economy on 911, and Secular
America. The evangelicals have delcared a holy war on secular
America as well, and have used our Democracy to defund as many
secular programs as they can in anticipation of Jesus establishing
his kingdom in America. A kingdom is not a Democarcy.
Texas has a large evangelico population, and is wanting to shore up
its borders and stop illegal alians from trespassing. Bush promised
to send troops, but, due to his holy war in Iraq, this is not
possible. Bush is now bogged down in Iraq, and soon Israel will be
bogged down in Lebanon. Meawhile the real threat, Iran and North
Korea, work on owning nuclear weapons.
Below is an article that suggests right-wing Christians want a
nuclear war. What I suggest instead is a New Exodus of all Jews from
Israel, and the surrender of Zionist ideas. I foresee a New Nation
of Israel whose new border will extend from the King and Armstrong
Ranch on the Gulf coast to New Mexico, to New Mexico, and not
exceeding the present size of Israel. This would give Israel an
opportunity to help America defend it’s borders from alians, as we
helped them. Consider the execellant wall Israel built against the
Palastinians. Consider the billions of dollars taxpayers will save!
Is this not what the Republcian party promised for ALL Americans and
not just Christian fanatics?
With Israel out of the Middle East, gas prices may go down. We can
make peace pacts with Muslims nations for their co-operation. The
whole world stands to save trillions of dollars! Is this not what
God/Allah would want for all His childen?
And isn’t it ironic that so many secular Americans have come to
believe in the Priory de Sion that many writers claim made the
Habsburgs the rulers of Mexico. Some authors claim Maximilan von
Habsburg was a descendant of Jesus, thus, the “disputed territory” a
descedant of Jesus and King David?
God works in mysterious ways! Does God want the Jews to own all the
oil wells in the Gulf of Mexico thus remedying His big mistake by
gifting them with the only land in North Africa with no oil? Will
the New Nation of Israel one day be a member of OPEC?
Jon Presco
Nazarite Judge
About $60 million in donations came from the evangelical community
to the Jerusalem Friendship Fund to assist Jewish immigration over
the past eight years, Yeheil Eckstein told the Chronicle. Eckstein,
an Orthodox American rabbi who heads the International Fellowship of
Christians and Jews, said he has joined forces in the campaign with
former Christian Coalition director Ralph Reed, now a Republican
consultant. In what would seem a provocative emphasis, the most
significant beneficiaries of the Christian funding are Jewish
settlements in Gaza and the West Bank. The director of the Israel
office of the Colorado-based Christian Friends of Israeli
Communities, which runs an “Adopt-a– Settlement” program, said
income for the settlements has doubled in the past 21 months. The
Chronicle also reported a mistrust among some Israeli Jews who fear
Christians want to convert or kill them upon the return of Jesus.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Zionism
http://www.texaswetlands.org/lowercoast.htm
http://www.mexicoranchsales.com/…/king/king_maps.htm
The Zionist movement before the 1930s met with some ambivalence
among the world’s Jewish communities. While the religious
connections with the Land of Israel were indisputable, many
disassociated themselves with the socialist ideology that dominated
early political Zionism. While the revisionist Zionist movement
emerged as an alternative over time, the Holocaust solidified
Zionism as a mainstream movement in world Jewry.The many Jews,
mainly in Europe, who supported socialist or communist political
ideas, took the view that the defeat of anti-Semitism and the
winning of civic equality for Jews required participation in the
common struggle against capitalism and oppressive regimes, and that
for Zionists to advocate emigration to Palestine was a means of
perpetuating the segregation of the “ghetto” that they were fighting
to overcome. Some Jewish socialists rejected this view and became
Socialist Zionists. The largest Jewish socialist organisation in
Europe, the General Jewish Labor Union, also known as the Bund,
opposed Zionism right up until the German invasion of Poland in
1939.Within the Jewish displaced persons community there eventually
emerged a strong pro-Zionist movement. Zionism became part of the
mainstream political consciousness of Arab Jewish communities and
the large communities in the Jewish diaspora, especially following
the formation of the State of Israel and the Six Day War.[edit]
Religious oppositionMany 19th century and early 20th century
Orthodox Jews objected to Zionism because they rejected secular and
atheist attempts to build a secular and socialist Jewish state in
Palestine. Orthodox Jews in this group did not reject the right of
Jews to move to Palestine and reconstitute a Jewish nation within
its borders, but instead hoped that if any such state were to be
created, it would follow to some extent Jewish law and tradition,
and that its leaders would be religious Jews. Other Orthodox Jews of
that time objected to any creation of a Jewish state in Palestine
before the arrival of the Jewish Messiah, though they accepted the
right of individual Jews to move to Palestine.In other words,
religious opposition to the State of Israel is different from
political opposition in that it does not deny the territorial claim
of the Jewish people (Am Israel) to the Land of Israel (Eretz
Israel), but rather objects to the formation of a secular state
(Medinat Israel) that pre-empts religious requirements that would or
could lead to the format of a new religious kingdom of Israel
(Malkhut Israel).Members of the Neturei Karta protesting against
Zionism.Zionism remained a minority view among Jewish diaspora until
the 1930s. The rise to power of Adolf Hitler, and the systematic
murder of six million European Jews by the Nazi regime in the
Holocaust, persuaded the majority of the world’s surviving Jews that
a Jewish state was an urgent necessity. Ever since, the great
majority of Jews, religious and secular, have supported the State of
Israel.A minority of Jews, however, continue to oppose Zionism on
either political or religious grounds. The most radical and vocal of
these is the small Neturei Karta group, which not only opposes
Zionism, but also opposes the existence of the State of Israel.
Among more mainstream Orthodox groups the most significant anti-
Zionist group would be the Satmar Hasidism, probably one of the
largest Hasidic group in the world, with over 100,000 followers,
along with other Hasidic groups which are influenced by Satmar and
revere the group’s late leader, Rabbi Joel Teitelbaum, as an
authority figure. Teitelbaum’s book, VaYoel Moshe, is an exposition
of one Orthodox position on Zionism, based on a literal form of
midrash (biblical interpretation). According to Teitelbaum, God and
the Jewish people exchanged three oaths at the time of the Jews’
exile from ancient Israel:That the Jewish people would not rebel
against the non-Jews that ruled over them; That the Jewish people
would not return to Israel (although individual Jews could do so);
That the non-Jewish world would not persecute the Jews excessively.
Another fringe[9] group claiming to profess Orthodox Judaism and
opposing the existence of the State of Israel is True Torah
Jews.This was the position of most of the Orthodox world until the
Holocaust. Even today, many Orthodox Jews, including the Agudat
Israel party, which has participated in most of Israel’s coalition
governments, accept the validity of these oaths. They argue either
that the Holocaust represented “excessive persecution,” and
therefore the Jews are released from the second oath, or, far more
commonly, that although they are opposed to Zionism, Israel exists
as a state, and it would be better to cooperate with it than to
actively oppose it. Regardless of their position, almost none of
these groups opposes the idea of Jews as individuals emigrating to
Israel, but rather oppose the notion of Jewish sovereignty over the
Land of Israel, either in its current form, or sometimes in any form
at all.
http://www.abu-amra.de/17%20September%201948.htm
UN mediator
Following the 1947 UN Partition Plan, on May 20, 1948, Folke
Bernadotte was appointed the United Nations’ mediator in Palestine.
This made him the first official mediator in the history of the
world organization. In this capacity, he succeeded in achieving a
truce in the 1948 Arab-Israeli War and laid the groundwork for the
United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the
Near East.
[edit]
Assassinated in Jerusalem by Lehi
Count Folke Bernadotte in uniform
Bernadotte was assassinated on September 17, 1948 by members of the
Lehi group, sometimes known as the Stern Gang. The assassination was
approved by the three-man Lehi ‘center’: Yitzhak Shamir, Natan
Yellin-Mor and Yisrael Eldad, and planned by the Lehi operations
chief in Jerusalem, Yehoshua Zetler. A four-man team lead by
Meshulam Markover ambushed Bernadotte’s motorcade in downtown
Jerusalem and team member Yehoshua Cohen fired into Bernadotte’s
car. Bernadotte and his aide, UN observer Colonel André Serot were
killed. The following day the United Nations Security Council
condemned the killing of Bernadotte as “a cowardly act which appears
to have been committed by a criminal group of terrorists in
Jerusalem while the United Nations representative was fulfilling his
peace-seeking mission in the Holy Land”.[1]
Fundamentalist U.S. Christians promote nuclear war in Middle East
Human Quest, Sep/Oct 2002 by Cheatum, Lynn
This summer, at a midtown park rally of the Justice Not Revenge
Network in Kansas City, I observed and photographed a young woman
heckling (see photo) the peace-oriented speakers. She accused them
of trying to circumvent God’s plan of Armageddon.
Another article (Armageddon theology a worry for the rest of us, in
The Human Quest July-August ’02) had warned of the existence of this
kind of belief. But I had never before seen and heard live evidence
of it.
The word is getting out that some of our fundamentalist Christian
brothers and sisters are trying to promote a nuclear war in the
Middle East so, in their interpretation of the Bible, they will get
a sudden trip to heaven.
But what about the majority of us who don’t believe in the
Armageddon theory? I find it hard to think kindly of folks who want
to hasten my death.
The same fundamentalist Christians are donating money to send
American Jewish immigrants to begin new lives in Israel, according
to a July 10, ’02 story in The San Francisco Chronicle, which
reported that experts believe that about 30 million Christians have
Zionist beliefs. They believe that the ingathering of Jews to the
holy land is the fulfillment of biblical apocalyptic prophecy that
will precede the second coming of the Christ.
Advertisement
‘);
}
// –>
About $60 million in donations came from the evangelical community
to the Jerusalem Friendship Fund to assist Jewish immigration over
the past eight years, Yeheil Eckstein told the Chronicle. Eckstein,
an Orthodox American rabbi who heads the International Fellowship of
Christians and Jews, said he has joined forces in the campaign with
former Christian Coalition director Ralph Reed, now a Republican
consultant.
In what would seem a provocative emphasis, the most significant
beneficiaries of the Christian funding are Jewish settlements in
Gaza and the West Bank. The director of the Israel office of the
Colorado-based Christian Friends of Israeli Communities, which runs
an “Adopt-a– Settlement” program, said income for the settlements
has doubled in the past 21 months.
The Chronicle also reported a mistrust among some Israeli Jews who
fear Christians want to convert or kill them upon the return of
Jesus.
Jewish settlements grew from 100,000 residents in 1992 to an
estimated 198,000 in 2001, according to official figures reported in
The Aspen Times July 12. The Israel government, breaking its own
laws and agreements, has an elaborate system of government
incentives.
The land variously called Israel and Palestine at different times in
history, is a small, (10,000 square miles at present) land at the
eastern end of the Mediterranean Sea. During its long history, its
area, population and ownership varied greatly.
http://tamusystem.tamu.edu/systemwide/06/01/features/kingranch.html
King Ranch sprawls across 825,000 acres of South Texas. At almost
1,300 square miles, it is larger than the entire state of Rhode
Island.
You could purchase 100 square miles of King Ranch and still have
room to fit the cities of New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Atlanta
and Boston inside the current borders.
If King Ranch declared itself a country and joined the United
Nations, it would be larger than 23 current member countries.
The county’s 1,457 square miles was home to 414 people in 2000,
according to the Census Bureau. Tijerina, who once won a Republican
primary with only two votes cast, says he manages to get elected in
an area that tilts Democratic because “there’s no other attorney in
the county.”
About two blocks past the local elementary school, Sarita’s main
street tails off into an open field. There are no stores in town.
The only place to purchase a cold drink is a vending machine: one at
the county courthouse and one at the justice of the peace office.
As for lunch, “that would be 5 miles north,” says Diana Mata, an
employee of the sheriff’s office.
In a community so small, a handful of founding families hold an
outsized influence. The likenesses of the four men whose ranches
still drive the local economy are painted into one of the colorful
murals that decorate the town’s museum. One of them is John
Armstrong III, a Texas Ranger who in the late 1800s bought the land
where Cheney was hunting with a $4,000 reward he collected for
capturing outlaw John Wesley Hardin.
Now, according to the county tax rolls, the 50,000-acre Armstrong
Ranch is worth $12.3 million. Ranch matriarch Anne Armstrong, a
major Republican donor whom President Ford appointed ambassador to
Great Britain, now serves as one of four elected Kenedy County
commissioners. She succeeded her husband, Tobin Armstrong, who died
last year. Cheney delivered a eulogy at Armstrong’s funeral.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_Ranch
Mexican War
On July 2, 1846, Kenedy signed on as captain of the steamer Corvette
and was sent to pilot the waters of the Rio Grande. At that time,
the Rio Grande was navigable from the mouth of the river to slightly
past Roma, Texas. Richard King, by this time, had arrived on the Rio
Grande and had signed on as a Second Pilot for the steamer Colonel
Cross. After the end of the war, King was able to buy the Colonel
Cross for $750 as surplus.Lea_p45
King attempted to make a living hauling merchandise on the Rio
Grande. In the meantime, Kenedy was able to make money by carrying
goods overland into Mexico. By March 1, 1850, King, Kenedy, Charles
Stillman and James O’Donnell entered into a business partnership (M.
Kenedy & Co.) to transport Stillman’s goods from the Gulf of Mexico
and up the Rio Grande. The enterprise required two types of
steamers — the Grampus and Comanche. Stillman sold his share of the
enterprise after the American Civil War; the new firm operated as
King, Kenedy & Co. until 1874.
[edit]
Santa Gertrudis Creek and the ranch’s origins
King first saw the land that would become part of the enormous King
Ranch in April 1852 as he traveled north from Brownsville to attend
the Lone Star Fair in Corpus Christi, a four day trip by horseback.
After a grueling, hot and dusty ride, King caught sight of the Santa
Gertrudis Creek, 124 miles from the Rio Grande. It was the first
stream he had seen on the Wild Horse Desert. The land, which was
shaded by large mesquite trees, so impressed him that when he
arrived at the fair, he and a friend, Texas Ranger Captain Gideon
K. “Legs” Lewis, agreed then and there to make it into a ranch.
http://www.texaswetlands.org/lowercoast.htm
http://www.mexicoranchsales.com/…/king/king_maps.htm
The Zionist movement before the 1930s met with some ambivalence
among the world’s Jewish communities. While the religious
connections with the Land of Israel were indisputable, many
disassociated themselves with the socialist ideology that dominated
early political Zionism. While the revisionist Zionist movement
emerged as an alternative over time, the Holocaust solidified
Zionism as a mainstream movement in world Jewry.
The many Jews, mainly in Europe, who supported socialist or
communist political ideas, took the view that the defeat of anti-
Semitism and the winning of civic equality for Jews required
participation in the common struggle against capitalism and
oppressive regimes, and that for Zionists to advocate emigration to
Palestine was a means of perpetuating the segregation of
the “ghetto” that they were fighting to overcome. Some Jewish
socialists rejected this view and became Socialist Zionists. The
largest Jewish socialist organisation in Europe, the General Jewish
Labor Union, also known as the Bund, opposed Zionism right up until
the German invasion of Poland in 1939.
Within the Jewish displaced persons community there eventually
emerged a strong pro-Zionist movement. Zionism became part of the
mainstream political consciousness of Arab Jewish communities and
the large communities in the Jewish diaspora, especially following
the formation of the State of Israel and the Six Day War.
[edit]
Religious opposition
Many 19th century and early 20th century Orthodox Jews objected to
Zionism because they rejected secular and atheist attempts to build
a secular and socialist Jewish state in Palestine. Orthodox Jews in
this group did not reject the right of Jews to move to Palestine and
reconstitute a Jewish nation within its borders, but instead hoped
that if any such state were to be created, it would follow to some
extent Jewish law and tradition, and that its leaders would be
religious Jews. Other Orthodox Jews of that time objected to any
creation of a Jewish state in Palestine before the arrival of the
Jewish Messiah, though they accepted the right of individual Jews to
move to Palestine.
In other words, religious opposition to the State of Israel is
different from political opposition in that it does not deny the
territorial claim of the Jewish people (Am Israel) to the Land of
Israel (Eretz Israel), but rather objects to the formation of a
secular state (Medinat Israel) that pre-empts religious requirements
that would or could lead to the format of a new religious kingdom of
Israel (Malkhut Israel).
Members of the Neturei Karta protesting against Zionism.
Zionism remained a minority view among Jewish diaspora until the
1930s. The rise to power of Adolf Hitler, and the systematic murder
of six million European Jews by the Nazi regime in the Holocaust,
persuaded the majority of the world’s surviving Jews that a Jewish
state was an urgent necessity. Ever since, the great majority of
Jews, religious and secular, have supported the State of Israel.
A minority of Jews, however, continue to oppose Zionism on either
political or religious grounds. The most radical and vocal of these
is the small Neturei Karta group, which not only opposes Zionism,
but also opposes the existence of the State of Israel. Among more
mainstream Orthodox groups the most significant anti-Zionist group
would be the Satmar Hasidism, probably one of the largest Hasidic
group in the world, with over 100,000 followers, along with other
Hasidic groups which are influenced by Satmar and revere the group’s
late leader, Rabbi Joel Teitelbaum, as an authority figure.
Teitelbaum’s book, VaYoel Moshe, is an exposition of one Orthodox
position on Zionism, based on a literal form of midrash (biblical
interpretation). According to Teitelbaum, God and the Jewish people
exchanged three oaths at the time of the Jews’ exile from ancient
Israel:
That the Jewish people would not rebel against the non-Jews that
ruled over them;
That the Jewish people would not return to Israel (although
individual Jews could do so);
That the non-Jewish world would not persecute the Jews excessively.
Another fringe[9] group claiming to profess Orthodox Judaism and
opposing the existence of the State of Israel is True Torah Jews.
This was the position of most of the Orthodox world until the
Holocaust. Even today, many Orthodox Jews, including the Agudat
Israel party, which has participated in most of Israel’s coalition
governments, accept the validity of these oaths. They argue either
that the Holocaust represented “excessive persecution,” and
therefore the Jews are released from the second oath, or, far more
commonly, that although they are opposed to Zionism, Israel exists
as a state, and it would be better to cooperate with it than to
actively oppose it. Regardless of their position, almost none of
these groups opposes the idea of Jews as individuals emigrating to
Israel, but rather oppose the notion of Jewish sovereignty over the
Land of Israel, either in its current form, or sometimes in any form
at all.
Rosamond Press 
Leave a comment