Retired federal judge J. Michael Luttig issued a searing rebuke of the Supreme Court’s unanimous decision that Colorado could not disqualify former President Trump from the ballot under the 14th Amendment’s insurrection ban, which preserved his ability to seek a second term.
I am peroposing an amendment to the Constitution that would only allow women who reside in the States that made up the confederacy, to vote. Here is my reasoning;
Confederate Women did not vote to secede from the Union, or, vote to determine if a State would abolish, or, keep slaves. Therefor, C-Women are not GUILTY of betraying our Democracy, and taking part in the KILLING of tens of thousands of LOYAL AMERICANS. This act – that betrays God – according to Christian Nationalists, should never be forgiven, accept by Chief Rabbi Yitzhak Yosef of Israel who has the final say-so on all Supreme Court rulings, because he is closer to God than any religious man or woman in America. Because We The People have no Chief Christian, or, the egual of a Pope. We ONLY HAVE Chief Justices.
I propose Chief Yitzhak Yosef be seated on the Supreme Court, immediately, so he can decide if We the People – and American Jews who are Dual Citizens – will continue supporting HIS NATION’s militarily. Also, The Chief Rabbi will cast the deciding vote on Women’s Rights, and the Civil Rights of Black People. This is important, because Our Founding fathers did not give women the right to vote – or black slaves. Did the Jews ever support slavery? A correction was attempted, but, tens of thousand of men in the South – CHOSE NOT TO BE AMERICANS ANYMORE. This choice was not forced on them. They wanted to be – SEEN AS FOREIGNERS! I say – LET THEM BE FOREIGNERS…..JUST THE MEN! We forced them to be Americans again – by gunpoint! How – WRONG!
It is clear The God of The Jews WANTED Our Founding Fathers to create a EXCLUSINE Democracy. It would be impossible to render black people slaves again. However, giving the Right to Vote to women only in certain red states, would be a Godly Privilege!
So be it!
John Presco
Former federal judge: Supreme Court ‘dangerously betrayed’ democracy with Trump disqualification decision
BY SARAH FORTINSKY – 03/14/24 9:33 PM ET
Retired federal judge J. Michael Luttig issued a searing rebuke of the Supreme Court’s unanimous decision that Colorado could not disqualify former President Trump from the ballot under the 14th Amendment’s insurrection ban, which preserved his ability to seek a second term.
In a piece published Thursday in The Atlantic, Luttig, a longtime conservative jurist on the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, said all nine justices “dangerously betrayed” democracy in making their decision.
Voters and advocacy groups had filed dozens of challenges to Trump’s ballot eligibility in states across the country, claiming his actions surrounding the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack triggered his disqualification.
The high court sided with Trump by ruling Congress has exclusive authority to enforce the 14th Amendment to disqualify federal candidates.
Luttig, who had been vocal in support of the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to bar Trump from the ballot, described Section 3 of the 14th Amendment as the Constitution’s “safety net for America’s democracy, promising to automatically disqualify from public office all oath-breaking insurrectionists against the Constitution, deeming them too dangerous to entrust with power unless supermajorities of both houses of Congress formally remove their disability.”
“Our highest court dramatically and dangerously betrayed its obligation to enforce what once was the Constitution’s safety net for America’s democracy. The Supreme Court has now rendered that safety net a dead letter, effectively rescinding it as if it had never been enacted,” Luttig wrote.
Luttig pushed back on the argument that barring Trump from the ballot would be undemocratic, writing: “Disqualification is not what is antidemocratic; rather, it is the insurrection that is antidemocratic, as the Constitution emphatically tells us.”
He continued, “That the disqualification clause has not previously been invoked to keep traitors against the Constitution from having a second opportunity to fracture the framework of our republic reflects not its declining relevance but its success at deterring the most dangerous assaults on our government until now.”
Luttig, who previously submitted an amicus brief in the case, reiterated his core arguments in favor of upholding the Colorado decision.
“What ought to have been, as a matter of the Constitution’s design and purpose, the climax of the struggle for the survival of America’s democracy and the rule of law instead turned out to be its nadir, delivered by a Court unwilling to perform its duty to interpret the Constitution as written,” Luttig wrote.
“Desperate to assuage the growing sense that it is but a political instrument, the Court instead cemented that image into history. It did so at what could be the most perilous constitutional and political moment in our country’s history, when the nation and the Constitution needed the Court most—to adjudicate not the politics of law, but the law of the politics that is poisoning the lifeblood of America.”
Rosamond Press 
Leave a comment