Criminal Abuse of Presco Children

When I came out of trance at my first hypnotherapy session, my therapist had his pen poised to write the answers I gave to this question.

“What children does your father have access to. Give me their names and ages?”

By law Martin Schaefer had to make a police report. When Mark Presco told me Vic Presco raped our niece, Shannon Rosamond, I am the only one who called the police. There was no police report made because the victim has to make a complaint. Shannon does not contribute to Tom Snyder’s biography of her mother, nor do I. Who gave him the accounts of our sexual abuse? Vicki Presco gives no account of being abused, nor does Mark, who also refused to contribute to Snyder’s biography that says this on page 12;

“Precisely how much incest was visited upon the children (and grandchildren) by Vic and Rosemary Presco is not known and need not be repeated here.”

Outrageous! Why bring this subject up at all, if it is not going to comprise most of Snyder’s book, that was written to secure the movie rights for Stacey Pierrot who hired this ghost writer. There is no resolve and healing – BY THE VICTIMS! Crimes have been committed against the “grandchildren” – too! Why didn’t Pierrot and Snyder make a police report, or, beseech the police to investigate to see how much incest is taking place?

The answer is, these two parasites are conspiring to make money off crimes committed against children. Snyder tried tricking me into signing a non-disclosure agreement. If I had, I would not be able to give my firsthand account of the abuse of Presco Children.

Today, the FBI handed it’s incomplete investigation over to the Senate. The alleged perpetrator and victim, were not questioned about alleged crimes. This is not a police report. What the hell is it? Will We the People be able to read it – eventually?

Christine Ford was mocked, shamed, and humiliated by the President of the United States and several Republican Senators who was not questioned by professionally trained crime investigators to see if they conclude Christine was telling the truth.

I was mocked by my neighbor, Kim Hafner, who gleefully announced she was conversing with daughter, while I am not.

“Too bad you can’t talk to her. She agrees with me about how abusive you are.”

In the video below I went and got my camera after Hafner told two of my neighbors I was “seriously deranged”. She denies reading Snyder’s book, or, handing it over to others to read. When I handed it to Hafner, I told her there were accounts of child abused, and thus I do not want it passed around. Hefner was told I wanted her help in making a record of what did not sound right. There are REAL unsolved crimes – against children! Real accusations have been oppressed.

I asked one of the Fake Victims if I was abusive to her. Hafner stopped her.

“You don’t have to answer him!”

Kim Hafner was engaging in Character Assassination and guilt by innuendo. In a Democracy I get to know what I am accused of.  Hafner is conducting a closed Kangaroo Court – by invitation only! I ask Kathy what I did to her that was abusive, and she points to the “damned phonebook” as her evidence, while in the background Hafner is bidding her jurors not to read Snyder’s biography. Why? Did Hafner lie about not reading it, and thus does not own a collaborating account of I amd my siblings being incested. She does not want her handpicked Victims to see me as a fellow Victim, for they are enjoying depicting me as a Perpetrator.

Millions of Republican Women are bid to see Brett Kavanaugh as a Victim, and, Christine Ford, as a Perpetrator. There is talk about this turnabout giving a boost to Republicans in the up-coming elections. Are Kim and Her Court – Democrats? Are they feeling outraged? They have themselves to blame! They are False Accusers. Look in the mirror and behold how ugly you are! You have delayed Justice from arriving for several generations of my family which is utterly destroyed. Is Kim Hafner writing a book? Is she trying to exploit the terrible abuse of Children? This is why I am angry and alarmed, not about Snyder’s book being damaged, but by the betrayal of someone – who had gained my trust!

I talk about the Bad Business Reports that depict Christine Rosamond Benton as the most vile and destructive business person – born! One only look at her parents to discovered why taxes were not paid and why the IRS was conducting an investigation.

I talked about Christine’s utter dread of Big Waves. She and Vicki had nightmares about being killed by a big wave. Why then did they go to Rocky Point to look in tide-pools, when close to Christine’s house is a very famous – and safe – to do this? When I learned there was a party planned at Rocky Point, I sent a report to the Sherriff and bid him to talk to the party people, and, conduct an investigation. He did not.

I am the only one who calls the police! I called the police on Kim Hafner, who is stalking me in regards to contacting my daughter, Heather Hanson, who is Vic and Rosemary’s granddaughter. My investigation keeps running into outrageous obstacles. The truth has enemies – coming out of the woodwork! My lousy neighbors conspired to silence my voice that has been speaking out long before the MeToo Movement. Tom Snyder plagiarized my account of Rosemary pulling out hunks of Christine’s hair. I came to her rescue, and had to leave home, never to return.

I just noticed something in the photos above. My father is watching me create something in the dirt with my fingers. I am in the same pose while creating something in the sand. I was famous for carving roads in the side of a hill so my friends and I can place our cars and soldiers there. I had an unlimited imagination. Look who is by my side, watching me create something out of nothing. Christine was always by my side growing up. She credited me with being her teacher.

“You let me look over your shoulder when you painted. I learned so much from you.”

In the eleven years I have lived here, I do what I do best. I have a hundred projects I tend to. I spend so much time alone, minding my own business. I just discovered what I do to people that makes them come at me, to hurt me. They are jealous of me. Kim Hafner dragged me out of my tower, down into the dirty dog-doo she wallows in. She does nothing with her life. She wanted to make it very hard for me to – create!

That two creative siblings could rise above the extreme abuse they suffered, and do such beautiful works of art, is The Lesson millions of adults, who were abused as children, need.

John Presco

Copyright 2018

Rosamond’s Autobiography Was Disapeared

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on Wednesday night teed up a key vote to advance Kavanaugh’s nomination for Friday. Until that vote, senators will be rushing in and out of a secure facility at the Capitol to review the sensitive FBI report that the bureau has compiled, looking into allegations of sexual misconduct against Kavanaugh.

Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) and other Democrats plan to hold a news conference at 11 a.m. to speak about the FBI report, which they have characterized as rushed and too limited in scope.

In a morning tweet, Trump decried what he said was “harsh and unfair treatment” of Kavanaugh, writing that “this great life cannot be ruined by mean & despicable Democrats and totally uncorroborated allegations!”

In tweets starting around 4 a.m., Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) announced that the panel had received the report from the White House and that he and its top Democrat had “agreed to alternating EQUAL access for senators to study content from additional background info gathered by non-partisan FBI agents.”

The FBI’s report will be available at a sensitive compartmented information facility, or SCIF, in the Capitol Visitor Center, a secure room designed for senators to review sensitive or classified material, two Senate officials said. Just one physical copy of the report will be available, and only to senators and 10 committee staffers cleared to view the material.

The two parties will take turns having access to the FBI report in shifts, according to a senior Senate official. For example, Republicans will spend an hour with the report from 8 a.m. until 9 a.m. Thursday, then Democrats will have an hour with the report. It will rotate throughout the rest of the day Thursday and potentially into Friday, with staff members simultaneously briefing senators.

But even before the report was formally sent to the Senate, lawyers for Ford criticized what they viewed as an incomplete FBI probe.

“An FBI supplemental background investigation that did not include an interview of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford — nor the witnesses who corroborate her testimony — cannot be called an investigation,” her legal team said in a statement. “We are profoundly disappointed that after the tremendous sacrifice she made in coming forward, those directing the FBI investigation were not interested in seeking the truth.”

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (Calif.), the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, also took issue Wednesday with the decision not to interview Ford and Kavanaugh, both of whom testified at a high-stakes hearing last week.

“Last week’s hearing is no substitute for FBI interviews, especially when you consider the tenor of Judge Kavanaugh’s testimony,” Feinstein said in a statement. “When he wasn’t yelling and demeaning senators, he was making misleading statements that cast doubt on his overall trustworthiness. I don’t think that would happen with FBI agents seated across the table.”

The reopened FBI investigation was prompted by reservations expressed last by Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) about moving forward on a full Senate vote without further examination of the accusations of Ford and other “credible” accusers.

Even as the White House gave the FBI permission to broaden its examination, it continued to hold the bureau to a strict timeline.

Moreover, the inquiry focused mainly on the account of Ford, the research psychologist who alleges that a drunken Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her when they were high school students in the Washington suburbs.

The Washington Post reported Wednesday that the White House had restricted the FBI from scrutinizing the nominee’s drinking habits, as well as possible disparities between his alcohol consumption as a young man and his account before Congress.

Much of the focus Thursday will be on the reactions of three Republicans whose votes are considered key to Kavanaugh’s fate: Flake, Susan Collins (Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska).

On Wednesday, all three took issue with Trump’s mocking of Ford the night before at a political rally in Mississippi that drew laughs from his supporters.

Besides Flake, Collins and Murkowski, Democratic Sens. Heidi Heitkamp (N.D.) and Joe Manchin III (W.Va.) also have yet to announce how they will vote.

While trying to round up votes on his side, McConnell has also taken sharp aim at Democrats, accusing them of trying to “move the goal posts” on Kavanaugh’s confirmation fight by suggesting that Friday would be too soon for a key vote on him.

Senate Democrats opened a new front Wednesday in their objections to the investigations of Kavanaugh’s conduct, suggesting in a letter to Grassley that past FBI background checks of Kavanaugh include evidence of inappropriate behavior, without disclosing specifics.

The letter, signed by eight of the 10 Democrats on the Judiciary Committee, challenged the accuracy of a tweet from the committee’s Republican staff on Tuesday that said: “Nowhere in any of these six FBI reports, which the committee has reviewed on a bipartisan basis, was there ever a whiff of ANY issue — at all — related in any way to inappropriate sexual behavior or alcohol abuse.”

The Democrats said the information in the tweet is “not accurate,” urging the GOP to correct it.

“It is troubling that the committee majority has characterized information from Judge Kavanaugh’s confidential background investigation on Twitter, as that information is confidential and not subject to public release,” the Democrats, led by Sen. Richard J. Durbin (Ill.), wrote to Grassley. “If the committee majority is going to violate that confidentiality and characterize this background investigation publicly, you must at least be honest about it.”

The two committee Democrats who did not sign the letter were Sens. Christopher A. Coons (Del.) and Amy Klobuchar (Minn.).

Grassley’s staff responded on Twitter that “nothing in the tweet is inaccurate or misleading.”

“The committee stands by its statement, which is completely truthful,” the committee Republicans said. “More baseless innuendo and more false smears from Senate Democrats.”