I suspect Lara Roozemond and Belle Burch are conspiring to steal parts of my study. Plagiarism is rampant on this topic. If my daughter and her family, along with my family, had not sabotaged my novels, I would have one on the market. I retract all offers and inferences I sent to Lara’s e-mail. All my characters will be based upon the women in my family, including Elizabeth Taylor.
I suspect Belle is telling people I blog about, that I am insane. My family are celebrities, who get stalked. Belle hangs with street anarchists and witches who have cost the citizens of Eugene a million dollars. They solved no problems. Lara acts out as an aspiring actor. She is not a good actress. Belle is a activist. She is a failure. They have to believe I am after sex, because, they are after sex. Sex is a means to survive for them. Millions of sane women voted for Trump – after they knew he was a sex pervert. They are losers! Rather than go after those sane sisters, they go after me. Not able to comprehend why they put the monster in charge, they go for the odd and eccentric dude, the artist, poet, and writer.
This blog is an experiment to show how the mind of a writer, works. I have paid a heavy penalty. I’ve spoken in riddles because the parasites hover over me. These three women, are dead. They would approve of being in my books. They can not give me grief – just for the hell of it! The Woman’s Movement is dead! I was giving it life with my study of the White Goddess, Mary Magdalene, and the Holy Grail. My grandmother is the only woman who owned this name…………..
Mary Magdalene Rosamond
Rosemary Rosamond
Christine Rosamond
What is it about these names?
Christine Mary Rosemary
It’s the claim that seers said I died and say heaven, isn’t it? It irks you, so. I am not making this up. You want it to be a lie. It is not. Women are LIARS these days, these dark days. This idea messes with women’s Money Shot, like the one Lara took of her being a black man’s baby girl. This is not about sex, it’s about this man being – very rich and successful! This is not my image of Victoria Bond. Who is that woman with Belle hiding her face from my camera? I bet she is giving SLEEPS money, and does not want to be identified. Is this why they threatened my life, if I don’t remove everything about Belle from my newspaper?
Do women like THE TRUTH? Trump hates the truth! In these Templar Priory de Sion groups, they hated it when I brought us y family names and the truth my sister – who has Christ in her name – was a world famous artist – and a woman. There were writers in these groups who claim Da Vinci ‘The Artist’ was aware of a Jesus bloodline that produced creative people and artists. I was dismissed – DISQUALIFIED! I threatened to author a Grail Romance and Mystery in a fictional format.
Since Baigent and Leigh had presented their conclusions as historical research, not as fiction, Justice Peter Smith, who presided over the trial, deemed that a novelist must be free to use these ideas in a fictional context, and ruled against Baigent and Leigh
I am ELECTED! My surviving sister, Victoria Mary, is my Judas – and Christine’s!
Jon Presco
|
Lawsuits[edit]
Author Lewis Perdue alleged that Brown plagiarized from two of his novels, The Da Vinci Legacy, originally published in 1983, and Daughter of God, originally published in 2000. He sought to block distribution of the book and film. However, Judge George Daniels of the US District Court in New York ruled against Perdue in 2005, saying that “A reasonable average lay observer would not conclude that The Da Vinci Code is substantially similar to Daughter of God” and that “Any slightly similar elements are on the level of generalized or otherwise unprotectable ideas.”[26] Perdue appealed, the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the original decision, saying Mr. Perdue’s arguments were “without merit”.[27]
In early 2006, Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh filed suit against Brown’s publishers, Random House. They alleged that significant portions of The Da Vinci Code were plagiarized from Holy Blood, Holy Grail, violating their copyright.[28] Brown confirmed during the court case that he named the principal Grail expert of his story Leigh Teabing, an anagram of “Baigent Leigh”, after the two plaintiffs. In reply to the suggestion that Henry Lincoln was also referred to in the book, since he has medical problems resulting in a severe limp, like the character of Leigh Teabing, Brown stated he was unaware of Lincoln’s illness and the correspondence was a coincidence.[29] Since Baigent and Leigh had presented their conclusions as historical research, not as fiction, Justice Peter Smith, who presided over the trial, deemed that a novelist must be free to use these ideas in a fictional context, and ruled against Baigent and Leigh. Smith also hid his own secret code in his written judgement, in the form of seemingly random italicized letters in the 71-page document, which apparently spell out a message. Smith indicated he would confirm the code if someone broke it.[30] After losing before the High Court on July 12, 2006, they then appealed, unsuccessfully, to the Court of Appeal.[29][31]
In April 2006 Mikhail Anikin, a Russian scientist and art historian working as a senior researcher at the Hermitage Museum in St Petersburg, stated the intention to bring a lawsuit against Dan Brown, maintaining that he was the one who coined the phrase used as the book’s title and one of the ideas regarding the Mona Lisa used in its plot. Anikin interprets the Mona Lisa to be a Christian allegory consisting of two images, one of Jesus Christ that comprises the image’s right half, one of the Virgin Mary that forms its left half. According to Anikin, he expressed this idea to a group of experts from the Museum of Houston during a 1988 René Magritte exhibit at the Hermitage, and when one of the Americans requested permission to pass it along to a friend Anikin granted the request on condition that he be credited in any book using his interpretation. Anikin eventually compiled his research into Leonardo da Vinci or Theology on Canvas, a book published in 2000, but The Da Vinci Code, published three years later, makes no mention of Anikin and instead asserts that the idea in question is a “well-known opinion of a number of scientists.”[32][33]
Lewis Perdue (born 1949 at Greenwood, Mississippi) is the author of 20 published books including Daughter of God, and The Da Vinci Legacy. Perdue was sued by Random House in 2003 when he charged that Dan Brown‘s The Da Vinci Code plagiarized those two books. Random House won the lawsuit but lost their demand to have Perdue pay their legal fees.
The Lost Mysteries of Leonardo
The Da Vinci Codex is a priceless collection of Leonardo’s original work– or is it? When Da Vinci scholar Vance Erikson discovers that several of the Codex’s pages are forgeries, the search is on for the genuine documents, which may hold startling secrets and revelations.
But Erikson is not the only one seeking the missing pages. He soon finds himself the target of a murderous conspiracy that dates back to the dawn of Christianity itself. For the Da Vinci Codex is more than just a precious document. It is also the key to a long-lost discovery of frightening importance. Now, not only Erikson’s life but the future itself is at stake. Ultimate power is the prize for whomever seizes …
The Da Vinci Legacy
First published in 1983, The Da Vinci Legacy is an engrossing international thriller.
Fine plotting.”–“Los Angeles Times on “The Da Vinci Legacy
”
“A very well-written, fast-paced novel of cloak and dagger operations that takes part entirely in Italy with all the local color it deserves.”–“West Coast Review of Books on “The Da Vinci Legacy “A superb thriller!”–“The Indianapolis Star on “Daughter of God “An edge-of-your seat thriller.”–“Booklist (starred review) on “Daughter of God
“A very well-written, fast-paced novel that takes part entirely in Italy with all the local color it deserves.”
“Fine plotting.”–“Los Angeles Times” on “The Da Vinci Legacy”
“”
“A very well-written, fast-paced novel of cloak and dagger operations that takes part entirely in Italy with all the local color it deserves.”–“West Coast Review of Books” on “The Da Vinci Legacy””A superb thriller!”–“The Indianapolis Star” on “Daughter of God””An edge-of-your seat thriller.”–“Booklist” (starred review) on “Daughter of God”
This book was originally released in 1983, then was tweaked for a re-release in 2004 amongst all the DaVinci Code hubbub. However, this book lacks the cultural and historical awe of Brown’s famous novel and a number of others who jumped on the religious conspiracy-theory type novel bandwagon. Purdue tries to fit in too much action and not enough character development or history, leaving DaVinci himself to take a backseat to international politics and economics. Plus, while Purdue tries to update his book for the 21st century (euros, Iraq war, 9/11) he fails to make other necessary adjustments, which leave the timeline inconsistent and half of the narrative stuck in the early 80’s.
The hero, Vance has a background in the military, while being a rogue oil locater and the most experienced amateur DaVinci scholar in the world. Um, how convenient for a guy like him to have so many obscure skills. His accomplice in the adventure is enemy reporter turned lover, Suzanne, who happens to be an ex-spy, another set of useful abilities to go along with Vance’s as they dodge bullets, make narrow escapes, and add to the body count. And though Suzanne still holds a grudge for being spurned by Lance in college, the immediacy of their professions of love seem a bit implausible.
The only moderately fascinating plot point was the mystery behind the secret organization, which wields uncanny power and has a bizarre if fanciful history. But the captivating things that should have been more elaborately portrayed fell short. There is not enough about DaVinci and the religious aspects of the plot. It tries too hard to be about international conspiracy that is so far reaching it seems ridiculous. While Purdue tried to capitalize on a hot topic that was revitalized in fiction, he would have been better off completely re-writing the book and thoroughly revising the sub-par dialogue, rethinking the poor decisions made by the characters, completely modernizing it, and developing the plot to be more engaging.
The Vatican has lost its most closely held secret—irrefutable proof of a woman Messiah named Sophia. Born in the Holy Land in 310 AD, Sophia was known for performing healing miracles. Her divinity threatened early Christian dogma and she was executed as a girl by Church authorities.
In the present, Kate Sheridan visits Switzerland with her husband, where she expects to purchase the estate of a German art collector. But before Kate can complete the transaction, they are drawn into a thousand-year-old web of conspiracy and intrigue that begins and ends with the mystery of Sophia—and all the powerful forces who share the objective of protecting their patriarchies from a divinely feminine truth.
At the publisher’s request, this title is being sold without Digital Rights Management software (DRM) applied.
Rosamond Press 
Leave a comment