Gematria (Numerology) in the Arabic Alphabet
-
knooruddin@visto.comHello listmembers, I m having a very weird day today. I don t know what is happening. I am having a million split second flashes of images passing through myMessage 1 of 5 , Mar 13, 2001View SourceHello listmembers,
I’m having a very weird day today. I don’t know what is happening.
I am having a million split second flashes of images passing through
my consciousness, but I can’t grab a hold of a single one. I can’t
seem to focus any thoughts at all (maybe a storm in about to blow
in?). But I did promise to write something on this subject matter
today, so please forgive my lack of any proper introduction on these
sites that I found last night.I haven’t read too many of them thoroughly. Edip Yuksel I am
personally familiar with, having corresponded to him at length in the
past when another revert friend of mine was heavily into discussions
with him and included me in the correspondence. Also, Mukul Patel is
a friend of mine and I am including his web site just because I think
it fits into the idea that I have (and apparently Pythagoreas and
many others, too) that the universe is in a perfect order that can be
observed and measured. Mukul’s work is attempting to prove that
there is math or numerical proofs even in philosophy.The rest appears to be just a continuation of an ancient system of
belief in an ordered world, using the best modes of available
measuring equipment – our fingers. Numerology of scriptures dates
waaaaay back. I always get this confused, but either Hebrew was
first and split into Aramaic and Arabic, or it was Aramaic first that
split into Hebrew and Arabic (I think the latter). I saw references
to the effect that the Arabs were the ones that retained the
numerology and other magic secrets during certain dark ages. That
would be an explanation of why Templars and Cabalists all got
together with Muslims during certain times. Check out these sites:For a full description of Mukul’s “Principia” series of works,
including “Pricipia Philosophica” see
http://www.crosswinds.net/~principiahttp://www.yuksel.org/e/religion/prime.htm
http://fakir60.tripod.com/gematria.htm
(this is interesting and I will myself read more. It regards the
debate over whether the “Miracle 19” – the Numerical Miracle of the
Qur’an – is true or false. This site brings into the discussion the
fact that some use the “hamza” as a letter of the alphabet and seems
to prove the theory if it is included. Note that the “Alif”
pronounced like “Ah” most of the time, is always considered a
consonant in Arabic language. The “Hamza” is also a consonant that
is sometimes used in place of the “Alif”. I don’t know the rules yet
when one is used and not the Alif, but maybe if the Alif is at the
end of a word, a hamza is used instead.)http://www.mashriq.org/
(a note on the above – first time I have seen “Shi’a” and “Sufi” on
the same page. This does not seem to be a mainstream site at all –
actually none of the numerology stuff is considered mainstream
anymore, but it probably should be)http://www.mashriq.org/alchemy.html
http://users.northnet.com.au/~wanderer/boar/druidfaq.txt
http://www.uspsionics.com/pages/Numbers/Hist_num.html
(The authors acknowledge the site as less than absolutely accurate,
which is good becuase I saw a small error regarding Islam. But the
list is very intersting.)http://collection.nlc-
bnc.ca/100/201/300/ejmas/kronos/2000/NewHist0500-1349.htmKaren

Leave a comment