In the probate of Christine Rosamond Benton, who is kin to Dame Elizabeth Rosemond Taylor, are filed my claim and objections to outsiders coming to own our family history and artistic legacy. I objected to our family secrets, and the abuse we suffered at the hands of our alcoholic parents, being USED by non-professional people posing as psychologists and art experts in order to take, take, take!
In a superior court there will forever rest my the hint of my study that Dan Brown would exploit. I put the names of royalty, there. I objected to the advertisement of the novel ‘Love Match’ about a famous gay marriage, and what was titled ‘Galimony’. I claimed we are a traditional American family, and not a dumping ground for strangers who seek to exploit adults who were abused as children.
I understood my family was at the heart of Cultural Warfare. I mentioned my fight against the Christian-right who will exploit our President’s support of gay marriages in order to put more politicians in power so they can remove the social safety net founded upon the mercy of Jesus Christ.
When Bill Cornwell called me, he said he was a traditional kind of guy. Five minutes later he is calling me a parasite. One minute later he says this;
“If you were just some dude on the street, I would kick your ass!”
Traditional kind of dudes do not fuck women out of wedlock, and they respect elders! How dare this bullshitter, who gave my daughter no engagemnt ring, tell me how he is going to raise my grandson!
Bill had called me a nut, and claimed I was harassing Heather in regards to her being my Trustee. It is none of his fucking business. Show me a marriage licence, or shut the fuck up! In the good ol Celtic days, Bill’s head would be on a pole outside my lodge, reminding my peers what I think of usurpers.
Heather told me she too believed I was a parasite on society. She said;
“You avoided serving in the armed forces!”
“Did Bill serve?” asked I.
“No,but at least he wanted to.”
Bill’s father had come to stay for five days, and he met Heather and my beautiful grandson who has blondish hair and pale blue eyes like my grandfather, Royal Rosamond. Was Mr. Cornwall wanting a grandson, he eyeing Tyler Hunt in order to fulfill family traditions? Bill’s father is an ex-cop and had a military career. I bet you he is a Tea Bagger, and was not happy to hear Tyler’s grandparents were real Hippies.
I have a vision of the Cornwell men at the kitchen table, grilling my daughter about her political persuasions, they convincing her her father is a parasite on American Society, and needs to be weeded out, drummed out of the superior Cornwell family plan, before Bill will ask for my daughter’s hand. She had just moved in with Bill and had no where to retreat.
“You got it. No problem! And, Tyler is all yours!”
Many gay couples are wanting for children. For some reason my family is at the core of the Cultural Warfare that is raging in this democracy. The use of the term “parasite” suggests a neo-Nazi source. Neo-Nazis are prevalent in the Armed Forces. Is it possible, that Bill and his friends believe they are on the front line, and are saving American from foreign parasites – and all oddballs and nuts? In my opinion Bill and Heather introduced right-wing politics into personal family matters, and thus can not go running to Mommy America for supreme privacy. Before Heather would resume being my Trustee, she tried to get me to sign a notorized document forbidding me to write about those family members she loved. I didn’t make the new list, in the new order. The age of the Cornwell Men, begins!
“Mission accomplished father Sir! I have captured the beautiful blonde Aryan boy from the camp of the disloyal Hippie degenrate law breakers.
When I asked Heather why she divulged my personal monetary matters to a man she only knew for two months, she said;
“We love each other very much. We tell each other everything.”
One traditional thing the Cornwell Men love above all things is – FAMILY LOYALTY! That my daughter, and grandson show me no family loyalty is overlooked by the Cornwell Men because they are very special These are the Guardians of American values!
I asked the executor of Christine’s creative legacy for the notes Sandra Falkner took when she talked to my sister just before she died. No dice! They are the personal property of the author who divulged a famous tennis stars secrets -for money!
Consider Judas – and my Christ-complex! I am being elected by many who betray me, show me no loyalty. Everyone came away with a bag of money, but me! I was elected the Family Scapegoat. Ouch! It is remarkable how family members believe I feel no pain.
Now, that I have given our family secrets away for free in this blog, it’s my turn to cash in. My blog is ‘The Greatest Soap Opera Ever Made’ as Vic’s best friend once discribed the Prescos. I am going to apporach HBO and try to sell US to them. The Sapranos were a closed family system. The Prescos are at the epicenter of real Cultural Warfare, that is all about cpaturing Beautiful America – and then the World!
All monies I get for being a reporter for Rosamond Press Company, will be left to Tyler Hunt in my Will.
So be it! Now get the fuck out of my way! I got a big job to do!
Jon Presco
President: Royal Rosamond Press Co.
Copyright 2012
Dear Honorable Gavin Newsom;
By an incredible twist of fate it appears
our paths have crossed in regards to Lawrence Chazen and the Getty
family. There exists in the Probate of my late sister, Christine
Rosamond Benton, a overwhelming scandal that may become the focus of
much public attention in regards to Gay Marriages. In my sister’s
probate are letters I filed protesting the advertisement of the
Lesbian novel ‘Love Match’ which is about the marriage of Martina
Navratilova to a Beauty Queen. The author os this book was authoring
the biography of my sister who drowned at Rocky Point. She was a
partner of Lawrence Chazen in her Carmel Gallery.I am asking you to
champion my cause and help me be represented in this Court of Law
that has so far utterly ignored my ‘Family Values’. The two oldest
structures in San Francisco were brought around the Cape in a Clipper
in 1849 by my great grandfather , Carl Janke, who set them up in
Belmont. Janke is the co-founder of this city where he built
California’s first theme part ‘Tansforan’. These homes were later
moved to S.F.I am writing a biography of my late sister……..
Martina Navratilova, the world’s most famous female tennis player, won a record nine Wimbledon championships. Judy Nelson, born and raised in Texas and the epitome of the “Southern Belle” – tall, statuesque, and blond, beautiful and articulate – was a former National Maid of Cotton and a graduate of Texas Christian University. The two came together . . . and the result was Love Match. Judy and Martina first met when Martina was playing a doubles tournament in Fort Worth in 1982. Judy, married and the mother of two sons, was introduced to Martina by her son Eddie, then eleven, who was serving as a ball boy for one of Martina’s matches. A friendship grew. For two years the women exchanged cards and phone calls. Then, in March 1984, over a long, uninterrupted lunch, they fell in love. Judy, still married, didn’t know what to do, and neither woman was clear about what the declaration of their feelings meant to their lives. What happened thereafter is the explosive substance of Love Match, the unvarnished, objective story of a romance between two women – the choices that were made and the risks that were taken. They made a commitment in church and exchanged rings. For seven years Judy and Martina were inseparable. Then Martina broke off the relationship. Judy was devastated, as were her sons and her parents. At last she decided to act. For she and Martina had agreed, in writing, “that each would share in whatever was accumulated during their relationship.” The ensuing “palimony” case engendered headlines around the world – and intensified the heartache. As the two headed for trial, a settlement was reached. The how and why of that settlement are here – along with the details of a very rareand special romance – a love match.
Disappointment as Gay Marriage Is Left Out of Queen’s Speech
View From Europe |
By HARVEY MORRIS
| May 10, 2012, 7:22 am 4 Comments
Oli Scarff/Getty ImagesQueen Elizabeth II prepared to deliver the government’s legislative program on Wednesday.
Facebook
Twitter
Linkedin
Share
Share
Close
Reddit
Tumblr
Digg
E-mail
Print
LONDON — Call it bad timing. On the very day President Barack Obama gave his endorsement to same-sex marriage, the British government appeared to defer a promise to legalize it.
Gay rights activists were described as “bemused” by the decision not to include the issue in the legislative program outlined Wednesday in the annual speech by Queen Elizabeth II.
Although same-sex marriage is a less emotional and divisive issue in much of Europe than it has proved to be in the United States, Prime Minister David Cameron apparently opted to avoid a potential spat with the right wing of his Conservative Party after a poor showing in local elections last week.
Seven European states already allow gay marriage, and Britain, where same-sex civil partnerships have been legal since 2004, was due to follow suit by 2015. François Hollande, France’s president-elect, is also expected to push for same-sex marriage when he takes office.
At his party’s annual conference last October, Mr. Cameron said gay marriage was about equality and commitment.
“Conservatives believe in the ties that bind us; that society is stronger when we make vows to each other and support each other,” he said. “So I don’t support gay marriage despite being a Conservative. I support gay marriage because I’m a Conservative.”
Activists are now concerned that Mr. Cameron might be backing away from a commitment to change the law after right-wing MPs urged a return to “traditional values” after last week’s local election losses.
Gerald Howarth, junior defense minister, suggested the same-sex marriage issue was a contributing factor in the results. He told the BBC: “A lot of Conservatives have written to me saying ‘I am a lifelong Conservative, there is no mandate for this, why is this being proceeded with?’ ”
Others suggested gay marriage was a “distraction” when the government had much more pressing issues to confront, including the economy.
Ben Summerskill, chief executive of the British gay rights charity Stonewall said on Wednesday: “We’re disappointed that this modest measure has not been included in the Queen’s Speech.”
When Pink News, a gay news service, questioned the prime minister’s office over the weekend on reports that legislation would be dropped from the Queen’s speech, a spokeswoman said there had never been any plans to include it. That, however, “does not” mean that Mr. Cameron is “backing down” or “diluting” his policy on equal marriage, she added.
Yvette Cooper, the opposition Labour Party’s spokeswoman on home affairs, urged Mr. Cameron not to backtrack, saying, “The attempt by the Tory Right to blame equal marriage for their election results is utterly ludicrous and reveals instead their deep hostility to equality.”
Coinciding with a potential government about-face, activists this week started a new campaign — Out4Marriage — to garner support for the legalization campaign by putting online video endorsements from politicians of all parties and global A-list celebrities.
The Coalition for Equal Marriage was meanwhile offering a guide for British voters wanting to know where their elected representatives stood on the issue.
As the British government deferred the issue of legalization governing marriage law in England and Wales for at least another year, there were appeals for the Scottish Parliament to take a lead.
“The Scottish Government now has the perfect opportunity to prove that Scotland is capable of being the progressive beacon that our political leaders want it to be, by leading the way on equal marriage rights,” Tom French, policy co-ordinator for the Equality Network, said.
Rosamond Press 
Leave a comment