Steve Schmidt and I

I watched The Great War last night and saw internment camps for pro-Germans. Woodrow Wilson was oppressing Free Speech in America. A case has been made he got us into that war because radicals were taking over White World and threatening the aristocracy – everywhere! German Americans were put in internment camps. I now see what happened to my German ancestors.

I am going to post on Steve Schmidt’s excellent assessment on the Christ Hayes show. I am not reaching enough people. Most newspapers are having this problem. Trump is having an affect. Are Democrats going to be able to get out the vote?

I am going to start publishing books, and make sure my archives are preserved. I am going to pass around my ideas for movies and sitcoms.

Jon Presco

http://www.msnbc.com/all

Steve Schmidt on Travel Ban Ruling: Trump is Responsible For the ‘Fulfillment of Osama bin Laden’s Vision’

Steve Schmidt on Travel Ban Ruling: Trump is Responsible For the ‘Fulfillment of Osama bin Laden’s Vision’

Steve Schmidt on Travel Ban Ruling: Trump is Responsible For the ‘Fulfillment of Osama bin Laden’s Vision’

Outside the Supreme Court on Tuesday, protesters and members of Congress accused the justices of adopting a double standard: one set of rules for white Christians and another for Muslims and other religious minorities. “It’s an obvious contradiction,” said Rep. André Carson of Indiana, a Democrat who’s one of two Muslims in Congress. “It’s absolutely apparent that there is a double standard.” In a sharply worded dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the high court’s decision on Trump’s travel ban sends precisely that message.

http://www.msnbc.com/transcripts/all-in/2018/6

White nationalist and Virginia GOP Senate nominee Corey Stewart has proclaimed himself to be a big fan of Confederate monuments, even though his lutefisk-loving ass was born in Minnesota.

With that in mind, it’s a little bewildering that Stewart apparently doesn’t know the first thing about the Civil War or what his Confederate heroes were fighting for.

In an interview for The Hill, Krystal Ball asked Stewart if the Confederate flag represented some of the “uglier parts of American history.”

“I don’t at all,” Stewart responded. “If you look at the history, that’s not what it meant at all, and I don’t believe that the Civil War was ultimately fought over the issue of slavery.”

“We have to put ourselves in the shoes of the people who were fighting at that time,” he added. “And from their perspective, they saw it as a federal intrusion of the state.”

This is total bullshit. Here’s a quote from Alexander Stephens, the vice president of the Confederacy, about how important slavery was to formation of the Confederacy:

Our new Government is founded upon exactly the opposite ideas; its foundations are laid, its cornerstone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery, subordination to the superior race, is his natural and moral condition. [Applause.] This, our new Government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth.

One of the most striking characteristics of insanity, in many instances, is, forming correct conclusions from fancied or erroneous premises; so with the anti-slavery fanatics: their conclusions are right if their premises are. They assume that the negro is equal, and hence conclude that he is entitled to equal privileges and rights, with the white man.

This is from Georgia’s declaration of secession:

For the last ten years we have had numerous and serious causes of complaint against our non-slave-holding confederate States with reference to the subject of African slavery. They have endeavored to weaken our security, to disturb our domestic peace and tranquility, and persistently refused to comply with their express constitutional obligations to us in reference to that property, and by the use of their power in the Federal Government have striven to deprive us of an equal enjoyment of the common Territories of the Republic. This hostile policy of our confederates has been pursued with every circumstance of aggravation which could arouse the passions and excite the hatred of our people, and has placed the two sections of the Union for many years past in the condition of virtual civil war.

A brief history of the rise, progress, and policy of anti-slavery and the political organization into whose hands the administration of the Federal Government has been committed will fully justify the pronounced verdict of the people of Georgia. The party of Lincoln, called the Republican party, under its present name and organization, is of recent origin. It is admitted to be an anti-slavery party. While it attracts to itself by its creed the scattered advocates of exploded political heresies, of condemned theories in political economy, the advocates of commercial restrictions, of protection, of special privileges, of waste and corruption in the administration of Government, anti-slavery is its mission and its purpose. By anti-slavery it is made a power in the state. The question of slavery was the great difficulty in the way of the formation of the Constitution.

This is from Virginia, where Stewart is currently running for Senate:

The people of Virginia, in their ratification of the Constitution of the United States of America, adopted by them in Convention on the twenty-fifth day of June, in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and eighty-eight, having declared that the powers granted under the said Constitution were derived from the people of the United States, and might be resumed whensoever the same should be perverted to their injury and oppression; and the Federal Government, having perverted said powers, not only to the injury of the people of Virginia, but to the oppression of the Southern Slaveholding States.

You get the idea. (And if you don’t, Ta-Nehisi Coates put together a collection of these statements and declarations a few years ago in a piece for The Atlantic.)

Stewart’s Civil War revisionism isn’t new or unique, but it is a complete myth that racists and white nationalists like Stewart believe in order to convince themselves that their love of the Lost Cause isn’t racist or white nationalist. Congressional Republicans, even if they don’t endorse Stewart and even if he doesn’t win, should be forced to reckon with the fact that Stewart is one of them and would be one of their esteemed Senate colleagues if he was somehow able to beat Tim Kaine. (Currently, he’s polling in the double-digits behind Kaine.)

It is not impolite to call attention to this fact, because the only reason we even know that Stewart exists is because one of the two major parties in this country has thrown its arms open to white supremacists. Stewart even has support from their president:

We emailed Stewart’s campaign to ask at which point in the last 150 years he believes it would have become necessary for the federal government to step in and end slavery in the southern states, and will update with any response we receive.

Within days of his visit to Tennessee to see Anthony Hodges, the former No. 2 leader in the SCV who had earlier been purged by his enemies, Dean had reached a conclusion. Hodges, he E-mailed comrades in the SCV, had told him the group was moving “towards a more politically active, secessionist and racist agenda.” “Racial groups,” Hodges added, controlled “key leadership positions.” As a result, there was an ongoing “exodus” of lifelong SCV members, including U.S. senators.

And so Eric Dean quit the SCV. Members of the unit he served as chaplain did, too. And with that, the SCV’s entire European division ceased to exist.
For Rev. Dean, the clincher was a sermon from the SCV’s chaplain in chief that attacked “racial interbreeding” as ungodly and described slavery as biblically sanctioned. But that was only the latest development in a long and ugly story. For almost four years now, the SCV has been embroiled in an increasingly nasty civil war, as racial extremists battle moderates for control of what is certainly the largest Southern heritage organization in America. In the last year and a half, under the leadership of a new national chief whose politics have become clearer as his term of office unfolded, the ascendancy of the radicals has become undeniable.

Since Denne Sweeney took over as SCV commander in chief in August 2004, the group’s executive council has been stripped of moderate former commanders. A purge of some 300 members, accused of disloyalty for criticizing racism in the SCV, was completed. An ancient alliance with the Military Order of Stars & Bars, a sister organization for descendants of Confederate officers, was scuttled, and a bitter war with another old ally, the United Daughters of the Confederacy, erupted. Sweeney suspended an entire state division of the SCV and replaced its leaders. He diverted money originally intended for the upkeep of a cemetery and building a museum to a brand-new political arm. He promoted followers with documented racist histories to key national leadership positions. Through it all, Sweeney presided over an exodus of fully 25% of the SCV’s membership, which fell from 36,000 to 27,000

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.