Early Christians Were Afraid Of Paul

What if, Jesus appear in a cloud over the Vatican and ordered the Catholics to let Charlie Manson out of jail – and make him the Vicar of Christ so he could prepare the way for the third coming? Would you be afraid if Pope Charlie pointed you out as a trouble maker, someone who could not go along with his new improved program? Paul had armed killers at his disposal – for how long?

This is a young church that is struggling for its life! Why throw Paul into the mix, an act that no doubt drove many from this first church. If Paul tortured and killed members of my family, I would never walk into any church that had anything to do with Paul. Why would God, or Jesus, put believers to such a test?

In Timothy Paul says he is the perfect example of a great sinner, humbled and converted, thus, almost any sinner can enter his church. However, if you are a Jewish Saint, without sin, you are barred and threatened with bodily harm. Paul says HIS humbled saints are above the law, now, the law only applicable to low-life scum balls – SINNERS! Don’t let any Christian sect take over our Democracy and rule over us in the name of Jesus – and Paul!

Paul tells KINGS they got nothing to worrry about, because his threats are not aimed at them, so – RELAX – have a good time; call for your bowl and your fiddlers three!

Paul is the Anti-Christ, he undoing Jesus’ mission, which was to minister to the poor and disenfranchised – and not THE SELF-RIGHTEOUS! Paul was once a self-righteous Pharisee, whose ilk challenged Jesus’s credentials – in his face! Reformed – MY ASS!

Jon Presco

The Separation of Paul and Barnabas
By Wayne Jackson

Saul of Tarsus had been such a vicious persecutor of Christians that even
after his conversion the brethren were still afraid of him. When Paul eventually returned to Jerusalem following his conversion to Christ, Barnabas had to persuade the disciples to let the apostle fellowship with them (Acts 9:26). As a result of this intercession, a wonderful friendship between Paul and Barnabas was formed. It is, therefore, rather sad to note that they eventually had a “falling out” of sorts.

On their first missionary journey together, John Mark, the cousin of
Barnabas (Col. 4:10), accompanied them. Along the way, however, John Mark decided to return to his home in Jerusalem (Acts 13:13). The reason for his departure is not specified in the sacred text.

Later on, when a second campaign was planned, Barnabas proposed taking Mark as a helper, but Paul resisted the idea. The New Testament record indicates that a “sharp contention” developed between them (Acts 15:36-41). They could not reach an agreement, and so they split up. As far as the sacred record indicates, these two remarkable men never saw one another again.

The serious Bible student cannot read this episode and not be moved.
Nevertheless, there are some vital principles that one may learn from the dispute that developed between these Christian brothers.

Disagreements that Do Not Involve Doctrine
This dissension between Paul and Barnabas was not over a doctrinal issue. The rupture involved a personal dispute based upon a judgment call. To their credit, neither Paul nor Barnabas let the conflict distract them from their respective efforts of spreading the gospel.

Making application to Christians today, there will always be times when
good brethren will disagree in matters of opinion. The important thing is to keep focused on doing the will of Christ. That is what Paul and Barnabas both did. As a result, perhaps even more work was accomplished for the Lord because of the manner in which their disagreement was handled.

Who Was Right?
Was it Paul, or Barnabas? One simply does not know. Some, rather confidently, argue that Paul was just too stubborn to give in. Lloyd Ogilvie wrote:

“Paul had fought and won one of history’s most crucial battles over the
Gentile converts. He was not able, however, to apply the same truth to his relationship with John Mark” (Drumbeat of Love, Waco: TX: Word, 1976).

On the other hand, the church in Antioch “commended” Paul and Silas (Acts
15:40), but nothing is said about any commendation of Barnabas and Mark.
That circumstance may suggest how the matter was perceived by the saints in Antioch. Paul may have been guided by experience and cool logic, whereas Barnabas was moved perhaps by a kindred familiarity and a warm heart.

Many of us may be a bit drawn to Barnabas when we reflect upon the fact
that we too occasionally have needed a second chance. Over the long haul, the decision of Barnabas may have proved best – at least for John Mark. Years later, Paul finds the formerly useless Mark “useful,” as revealed in the apostle’s concluding epistle. “Get Mark and bring him with you, for he is useful to me for ministering” (2 Tim. 4:11). And in Colossians 4:10, one observes that the once-rejected young worker was commended, and the Colossian saints were asked to be receptive to him.

Other Observations
There are a couple of points that are worthy of consideration as our discussion is concluded.

1.The segmentation of their work did not disrupt permanently the love and respect that Paul and Barnabas entertained for one another. Paul would later affectionately mention Barnabas as being worthy of monetary support in his work of proclaiming the gospel (1 Cor. 9:6).
2.The fact that this personal conflict is openly displayed on the pages of the New Testament is evidence that the Holy Spirit guided the writer, Luke, in producing this narrative. Natural inclination would have led Paul’s friend to omit this potentially embarrassing incident!
3.There are many wonderful truths to be learned from the various experiences of the personalities portrayed in the Sacred Volume. No account, however irrelevant such may superficially appear to be, is without importance. There are lessons to be mastered.